I'm tired of everybody saying this one is better or that one is better lets finally decide, here is what I say:

I have a pIII-500MHZ and 128MB RAM and have a Voodoo3 3000 AGP and I have to say it is the best, not just for FIFA but all games.

The Matrox G400 is the best on PIII and K7 processors while the Voodoo 3 is the best for PII, Celeron, K6-III, K6-2, and K6 processors.

TNT2, It beats 3Dfx hands down.

I heard something about a new Voodoo4 chipset, could be ready for january. anyone else heard news about this?

actually the Voodoo 4 and 5 are available in March.

I've got an Asus TNT 3400, Great card, runs everything still fine. Due to bad experiences with 3dfx they won't easily see one of their products in my machine again.
As for the best ? Is that fastest or prettiest or with most features or what ? Gotta admit the G400 marvel sounds like one bitching card to me.

the voodoo5 6000 will kick any cards a_ss. it will have 128 megs of ram, four processors working together to churn out 1.32 to 1.47 Gigapixels Per Second, it supports textures up to 2048x2048, assist dvd playback, supports directx glide and open gl, and has the new t-buffer cinematic effects.

no one should buy the GeForce 256 or the new dual processor Ati card because they'll be dead when the new 3dfx cards hit the shelves.

i have a voodoo3 3000 by the way. i bought the tnt2 ultra first but it sucked a_ss. all my games but quake II ran sh_itty in directx.

Yes Rob and it only costs $600

Trouble is come July the 4th generation of 3D cards are due out. Voodoo 4&5 are just a stop-gap until they get there blurring and t&l perfected and then we'll see another bunch of cards, and then everyone will be asking which is the best again. As for right now I'd go for a TNT2 because its got 32-bit colours, it has more memory then a 3dfx card, and its just as fast perform-wise.