All of the Scream movies
Gigli
The Village
Almost all of the new movies that come out...they're running out of ideas

What movies do u think are the worst? List them here...

The prince and me looks shocking :(

ya i hate julia stiles and it does look dumb

Anything that is labelled a 'teen' movie.

Originally posted by rhizome17
Anything that is labelled a 'teen' movie. I second that. Also, Sister Act, The Rambo Films, anything that's adapted from a comic, anything with Leonardo DiCraprio in it, Natural Born Killers (purely cos it was such a wonderful Tarantino script butchered by that wanker Oliver Stone), that submarine film with Harvey Kietel which is so inaccurate it makes me wanna scream, Fillini's Roma, anything by Richard Curtis, Dungeons and Dragons, Air Force 1 and crappy american remakes of classic films (Italian Job, Get Carter etc)

but worst of all, cos it was such a massive let down, The Godfather Part 3

Attack of the Killer Tomatoes, Batman & Robin, all Rocky movies after the third one.

most of those movies you're naming are the 'worse' for you cause they were disappointents (in most cases). specially The godfather 3 which is the one that like less. and yes, sofia coppola cant act, but still is a great movie IMO. specially for the final scream by Pacino. thats an awesome scene (Y)

I just try to not watch the horrible ones. never seen Gigli, From Justin to Kelly or Catwoman, or house of the dead which are 4 of the most horrible movies these past 2 years people and awards say.

the movie thats said to be the WORSE OF ALL TIME is SHOWGIRLS and Id never seen it until a few weeks ago though I didnt see the ending (which is probably horrible and thats why people eneded up hating it) I thought it was just a bad movie with lots of tits and ass in it :hump:

Attack of the Killer Tomatoes is class (H)

I found Batman & Robin stupid but it was still batman. cant hate it :p

The Village is cr*p? really? i only heard positive things about that film, but i didn't see it myself altough i'm planning to see it..:rolleyes:

Village was a dissappointment, not the "worst movie." Even Hakeem admitted that iun his blog (H)

Spoiler:

You guys are just mad that the creatures arent real. For what it is, its a great movie.

what about dumb and dumberer (dumb and dumber 2)

i haven't seen it, but i heard it sucked dick.

I heard in some reviews that dumb and dumber 2 rivaled gigli in ****tyness

The third Matrix..:confused:

(N)(N)(N):kader: TOTAL DISSAPOINTMENT


FOR ME...

Was it "Reloaded"...:confused: I cant even remember :rolleyes:

How about Mallrats, that movie sure sucked.

Originally posted by ishan1990
what about dumb and dumberer (dumb and dumber 2)

I saw some parts of it and it was all really REALLY stupid.

then again, its a comedy, about stupid people. I couldnt say a comedy would be the worse movie ever.

I dont know, Id have to think about it, but for it'd probably be a bad acted, bad script drama with a really bad ending, but cant think of any right now :p

Titanic and Matrix 3! :kader:

Originally posted by Brondbyfan
How about Mallrats, that movie sure sucked.

the only thing i liked from that was Jay and Silent Bob... though for me their best movie was Clerks (Y) (H)

thought The Village was really good personaly !! great story and references.

Hands down, the worst movie I've ever seen is Garfield. :nape:

Originally posted by bjmenge
Hands down, the worst movie I've ever seen is Garfield. :nape:
i have a theory that anything with Jen. Love Hewitt in is worth seing.
Thought "I know what you did last summer" and "Tuxedo" were pretty useless but still saw them :p

yep. The Tuxedo was awful indeed. I could see hating Garfield too.
Im on a Bill-Murray-liking phase so I dont want to kill it with the fat cat :p

I think the worst movie I have seen is I, Robot. I actually found the scream movies decent.

Titanic :|

titanic was so trash and the village was the dumbest movie i have ever seen. they tried so hard and i hate than guy "Lucius" with the weird upper lip..all in all it was garbage

Rocky 5- (ruined the trilogy) Rocky was originally supposed to die, that really would have been the icing on the cake to a depressing and dull film, still a very bad film though.

Matrix 3- Two of the main characters die at the end and way too much CGI animation ruined the Matrix trilogy.

Street Fighter- Nuff said.

Driven - Probably the second worst film I've ever seen.

Batman & Robin- This gets my vote as the worst film I've ever seen, lol it was terrible. I just hope Batman 5 (Batman Beyond) is far better. Michael Cain is Alfred in the new Batman so it should be good.

Wizard Of Oz- That film gets on my nerves.

Robocop 3- He actually gets rocketpacks at the end and flies around LOL

Terminator 3- I really didn't like this one. No bone chilling soundtrack when a terminator was on screen, too much comedy in the film and a very poor storyline.

terminator 3 was ok but what the worst thing about films nowadays, is how they all kill the original movies with the sequels. Dumb and Dumberer..the saddest production ever

Dumb and Dumberer, all Matrix movies, Good Burger, Dude Where's My Car... the list goes on

the matrix movies were the most pointless and confusing movies..wow movies suck now

Originally posted by Seggie8
the matrix movies were the most pointless and confusing movies..wow movies suck now

Sorry mate but you can't diss the first Matrix movie. It was a masterpiece and is one of the best films of the 20th century.

thats true. the original was a mindblowing masterpiece.
the best sci-fi movie of its kind tied with Blade Runner which also had a similar idea

Originally posted by Spurs4Life
Sorry mate but you can't diss the first Matrix movie. It was a masterpiece and is one of the best films of the 20th century.

Thats right (:/) (Y)

along with Forest Gump :bouncy:

:Bow: Forest Gump


:rolleyes: :)

i did like forst gump (H)

Originally posted by Hakeem
thats true. the original was a mindblowing masterpiece.
the best sci-fi movie of its kind tied with Blade Runner which also had a similar idea

Blade Runner was a cool film, showing it's age now, but still an excellent film.

I agree (Y)

maybe a bit too slow, but its great movie (Y)(Y)(Y) :)

I'm surprised nobody's mentioned Cable Guy:|, it was like the worst Jim Carrey movie
Other movie that totally sucked ass were:
Matrix 2&3
Streetfighter :kader:
Mortal Kombat
Good Burger:|:|:|
Titanic
and last but not least The Tuxedo

The worst movies on Earth are movies with Hulk Hogan in them. Mr. Nanny, Santa with Muscles, Three Ninjas, Suburban Commando, Thunder in Paradise, No Holds Barred . . . need I go on?

I guess Rocky III would be the exception because that was just kind of bad.

two words......star wars....

Originally posted by Spurs4Life
Sorry mate but you can't diss the first Matrix movie. It was a masterpiece and is one of the best films of the 20th century.

Damn right (Y)

oohh how about The Beverly Hillbillies, Anaconda, Cool As Ice (starting vanella ice) :-puke: , Last Action Hero :kader: :kader:

EDIT --- but Spice World take my vote for 1st place

but seriously, you dudes think you got it bad with these movies??


hindi moves (movies from india) blow big time. They ******* suck.

they all have **** ass songs in them and dancing. in a 3 hour movie about 1 hour is singing and dancing. And that goes for mostly all the hindi movies. save a few.

They all have the basic same **** generic story line too...

man and women fall in love. Both try to **** each other, but there is another guy , and the women is either in love with him and goes with him..... well you get it.

of course there are different kind of movies too.
i saw a movie that was a really ******* cheap ripoff of ET.

the little alien looked like ET talked and walked and was a ******* moron like ET.

except for this gay extra testicaled (ET(H) ) was surrounded by dumb **** kids who sang songs and danced every 5 minutes.

whats worse is that its an adult movie.


I kind of had to write this fast so if anyone knows what the hell i'm talking about, please continue.

Originally posted by Pontiakos
two words......star wars....

Amen to that. Not the worst movie ever, but certainly the most overrated.

Originally posted by ishan1990
but seriously, you dudes think you got it bad with these movies??


hindi moves (movies from india) blow big time. They ******* suck.

they all have **** ass songs in them and dancing. in a 3 hour movie about 1 hour is singing and dancing. And that goes for mostly all the hindi movies. save a few.

They all have the basic same **** generic story line too...

man and women fall in love. Both try to **** each other, but there is another guy , and the women is either in love with him and goes with him..... well you get it.

of course there are different kind of movies too.
i saw a movie that was a really ******* cheap ripoff of ET.

the little alien looked like ET talked and walked and was a ******* moron like ET.

except for this gay extra testicaled (ET(H) ) was surrounded by dumb **** kids who sang songs and danced every 5 minutes.

whats worse is that its an adult movie.


I kind of had to write this fast so if anyone knows what the hell i'm talking about, please continue.

i know exactly what ur talking about.

all hindi movies include the sing-along and the two packies falling in love with each other and searching for each other behind trees.

every hindi movie i've seen is gay, stupid and pointless. they are all alike, and all of them have to do with how a guy loves this other hindu girl, but his parents do not approve of it.

also, all arabic movies are stupid too. i ***in hate them with a ***in passion.

all u ever see are women crying in them...god man i wish hindu movies and arabic movies would just die

Shah Rukh Khan rules! :rockman:



























Hehe (H)

matrix sequels
new star wars films
pearl harbour

You're all a bunch of retards.

All these movies are recent big name movies... what about films from 20 years ago that aren't even popular? They definatly would be sh!t house, a lot worse than 'the third matrix' or 'titanic' that frankly, were not even that bad at all.

You all say 'this is the worst film ever because it sucked' but seriously, you haven't seen enough films to judge what is the best and what is the worst, and you don't have such long term memories to remember what fimls REALLY suck, thats why you only suggest the big films and say 'this is the worst film ever because it is BIG NAMED and the ONLY FILM I KNOW ABOUT, therefore it sucks'.

There are many bad films, but the worst film ever would not be anything any of you have suggested, there is always something that will be worse, something you have never heard of before.

worst movie ive seen recently was 'A Mighty Wind', it was nowhere near the quality of 'Best In Show'. More of a bunch of jacka*ses that think theyre funny (minus eugene levy) more than anything else.

Blackdog for me, with Meatloaf. Was a shocking movie.

All The Matrix series . . .
Any Vin Diesel action movies . . .
Any movies about street racin, fast cars, super engine, all that rich macho kid stuffs . . .
Any teen movies . . .
Titanic . . . ( IT WON OSCAR !!!! :|:|:| )
Any movies about the end of the world, but suddenly the almighty US army prevent it and the whole freakin` world listen to the US President`s speech at White House and they holdin` hands together in brotherhood . . . ( YAWN . . . )
Any war movies that put US as the good guys and the rest as the bad guys . . .

I forgot to add : any sports movies in which the MVP is an animal ( Air Bud, etc ) . . .

basically movies that chicks want to watch......... or your parents :confused:

Originally posted by hanek45
The third Matrix..:confused:

(N)(N)(N):kader: TOTAL DISSAPOINTMENT


FOR ME...

Was it "Reloaded"...:confused: I cant even remember :rolleyes:

Matrix Revolutions was a good (great?) movie... not as good as the others, so yes... it can be considered as a disapointment, but not the worst... it stills a good movie...

Whoa, lots of replies here. Big post coming up :p

Originally posted by hanek45
The third Matrix..

TOTAL DISSAPOINTMENT


FOR ME...

Was it "Reloaded"...:confused: I cant even remember :rolleyes:

Damn right, Matrix 1 was a wonderful film with so much potential, a massively original storyline and a great fanbase. Matrix Reloaded (2) was a decent sequel, relied a bit too much on speciall effects but it had some very decent moments and all in all was very enjoyable, but Matrix three was such a piece of sh!t I couldnt believe it, such butchery of a great series disgusts me, it was so disappointing it has to be one of the worst.

Originally posted by ShearerM4
thought The Village was really good personaly !! great story and references.

Interesting how different the opinions on The Village are, it's not even out yet here in England but when it is I will definately be seeing it, even if only to see who's right.

Originally posted by bjmenge
Hands down, the worst movie I've ever seen is Garfield. :nape:

I am amazed you actually went to see it in the first place :p

Originally posted by Dazmania
Titanic :|

I would agree, except for that great moment where the boat is vertical and the people are falling off, some into the propellas, some hitting the funnels. That had me laughing so hard it single handedly projects it out of the sh!te catergory. That and Kate Winslet is lovely :p

Originally posted by Spurs4Life
Terminator 3- I really didn't like this one. No bone chilling soundtrack when a terminator was on screen, too much comedy in the film and a very poor storyline.

Yup, just like the Matrix, the series was set up fantastically, infact, in the case of Terminator, 2 was even better than 1, but T3 was shockingly bad and shockingly falsely advertised. The trailers made out the post-apocalyptic flashforwards to be the actual film which was very misleading. I felt cheated.

Originally posted by Pontiakos
two words......star wars....

Dont be a dumbass, the Star Wars films are legendary, esp the originals. They may not seem to good now, but when i was a kid I loved them as do thousands of kids. Very important, groundbreaking films.

Originally posted by Callan
You're all a bunch of retards.

All these movies are recent big name movies... what about films from 20 years ago that aren't even popular? They definatly would be sh!t house, a lot worse than 'the third matrix' or 'titanic' that frankly, were not even that bad at all.

You all say 'this is the worst film ever because it sucked' but seriously, you haven't seen enough films to judge what is the best and what is the worst, and you don't have such long term memories to remember what fimls REALLY suck, thats why you only suggest the big films and say 'this is the worst film ever because it is BIG NAMED and the ONLY FILM I KNOW ABOUT, therefore it sucks'.

There are many bad films, but the worst film ever would not be anything any of you have suggested, there is always something that will be worse, something you have never heard of before.

I see your point. In my original post I tried to include a mix of big names, such as Godfather 3, and older small budget movies, such as Fillini's Roma. I think the disappointment factor in many big films is a very important one however, the let down adds enourmously to them being awful films. I am a big fan of foriegn art cinema, expecially of Fillini, so the let down when I saw Roma, unquestionably his worse film, makes it stand out for me as worse than other low-budget movies. I suppose it depends how one defines 'worst' - the worst made, least popular, biggest flop, biggest disappointment, lowest taking etc. I mean, technically, Heavans Gate should be the worst as it cost $200m and made $25m, bankrupting a studio (United Artists) along the way, but it still is good to watch. It depends on how you look at it.

EDIT: I have seen well in excess of 1000 films (I'm sad) so I think I have seen enough to judge, but I see what you mean, most films we only go out to see because we think we will like them, so the really crap ones are really the ones we know will be crap so we dont even see them, or one of the millions of Bollywood or Oriental films that no westerner has ever heard of.

Originally posted by NottsSupporter
the postman...seriously :(

absolutely !!

just like many other kevin costner movies (except dancing with wolves)


- boring hugh grant love movies
- this britney road movie
- german tv movies
- the day after tomorrow
- wild wild west
- the fly
- blair witch project
- any cheap old alien/horror/monster productions

Matrix 2 and 3 and Terminator 3. Crap movies. Only the first Matrix movie was good enough. And looool at Calumn. You have so much to say dont ya? :p ;) (H)

Dungeons and Dragans by a long long way

TROD.

Originally posted by mixafendis
Matrix 2 and 3 and Terminator 3. Crap movies. Only the first Matrix movie was good enough. And looool at Calumn. You have so much to say dont ya? :p ;) (H) Yup, dont want anyone to feel left out cos I didnt comment on their post :p;)

Notting Hill (H)

How about Diamonds are Forever, what an insult to the Connery/Bond legacy.

Originally posted by Brondbyfan
How about Diamonds are Forever, what an insult to the Connery/Bond legacy. I didnt mind Diamonds are Forever. Worst Bond film was Goldeneye - that majorly sucked.

Personally, I enjoyed Goldeneye. Xenia Onatop bas a terrific villain. Diamonds are forever had some of the worst acting ever. And it had Jimmy Dean, yes, the pure pork sausage guy.

Originally posted by Brondbyfan
Personally, I enjoyed Goldeneye. Xenia Onatop bas a terrific villain. Diamonds are forever had some of the worst acting ever. And it had Jimmy Dean, yes, the pure pork sausage guy. My fav Bond film was Goldfinger for sure, an absolute classic and a wonderful story. I really liked Tommorow Never Dies too, very original, and You Only Live Twice. Diamonds Are Forever did kinda suck, but Goldeneye jsut had nothing for me.

Romeo must die...talk about the CGI ruining something or what....JEt Li' s upcomming movie HERO promises to be the same sort of thing !:D

Oh, and any movie where 2 guys are cops.. one of 'em black, the other white. Talk about overplayed stereotypes.

i forgot "24 hour party people" it was shown on sneak preview and most people (including me) left the cinema after 20 mins...

Originally posted by Vagegast
Oh, and any movie where 2 guys are cops.. one of 'em black, the other white. Talk about overplayed stereotypes.

hahah



:Showtime: :nape:

National Security

http://maddox.xmission.com/cop_movie.html

(H)

you guys are right on the money

Originally posted by TROD
yah Notting Hill was pretty bad

TROD.

what was lame about it??? :confused:
one of my favorite romantic comedies all time. one of the few movies I watched when Im depressed :( which I was Hugh Grant there :p

Originally posted by RuiCosta_10
Matrix Revolutions was a good (great?) movie... not as good as the others, so yes... it can be considered as a disapointment, but not the worst... it stills a good movie...

agree. I thought Revolutions was great, but Reloaded really ****ed up the trilogy so nobody could come out of Revolutions liking it.

the final showdown between humans and machines is awesome, the machine city is magical, and the final neo vs agent smith scene is excellent (Y)(Y)(Y)

damn. I actually thought about a movie that could be my worst but I forgot now :( :p

and now that I read national security up there, Black Knight was trully one of the worst Ive ever seen. even for a comedy it was a disaster :| (N)

that movie The 25th Hour sucks ass too

the Spike Lee movie with Edward Norton? :confused: really liked it too (Y)

it's a nice story ... but doesn't have much of a point

I liked that it had a 'real' feel.


Phillip Seymour Hoffman was great btw (Y)

Originally posted by Hakeem
what was lame about it??? :confused:
one of my favorite romantic comedies all time. one of the few movies I watched when Im depressed :( which I was Hugh Grant there :p Notting Hill is about the only Hugh Grant RomCom I like, Rhys Ifans kicks arse and the storyline is pleasant and uplifting without being rediculous. It's not great, but defiantely not one of the worst.

Shazam or something like that wtih Shaq o neal :sb9:
and Van Helsing, it really sucks!!!

Originally posted by Payukgcn
Shazam or something like that wtih Shaq o neal :sb9:
and Van Helsing, it really sucks!!! Van Helsing does not suck - a very decent film I thought. Definately my fav supernatural film since Sleepy Hollow, my only serious critisism was it's reliance on the luck/coincedence element, otherwise I thought it was very accomplished, pulling off a plot which should have been absurd relatively well and with some good acting performances.

The Sweetest Thing saw it cause it was on TV. This was just painfully bad, and i lost interest in Cameron Diaz because of it.

Serpico, because i had huge expectations. Mightve been a good move 20 years ago, but seeing it for first time recently, it was painfully boring.

The Medallion Me and my friends walked outta this one in theatre after 15 minutes, only time ive ever done that, and i snuck in too.

Pluto Nash Remember when Eddie Murphy was funny?

LXG This was one of the funniest movies of last year, too bad it wasnt a comedy and wasnt supposed to make me laugh.

Daredevil :-puke:
Queen of the Damned :sb9:

For me, I know I'm going to cop it, but Gladiator.

However, the only one worse than that was Anacoda.

Originally posted by Mikey

[b]Serpico, because i had huge expectations. Mightve been a good move 20 years ago, but seeing it for first time recently, it was painfully boring.
Strange, I didnt expect much from Serpico at all but it beat my expectations, it was brilliant but I thought it was pretty good and certainly raised some interesting questions.

Originally posted by Gareth

[b]For me, I know I'm going to cop it, but Gladiator.

However, the only one worse than that was Anacoda
You certainly are gonna cop it, while I did not enjoy Gladiator that much I can see what a good film it was - worst film of all time? - I think not.

Also, my brother informs me that Anaconda is hillarious :p

Gladiator was bad. It didn't deserve to be the best picture, but then agian, nolthing that year was good.

Gladiator certainly is not the best film ever, but it is not the worst, there are worse films, but it is certainly pretty sh!t.

I think.

Originally posted by Callan
Gladiator was bad. It didn't deserve to be the best picture, but then agian, nolthing that year was good. That was 2001 I believe? If so, it was a sh!t year, but no way did Gladiator deserve to pick up five - there's nothing really special about it. I would have given the Best Picture award to Traffic, myself, but I have long ago lost my trust in the oscars. Lord of the Rings was just a typical examply of how crap and conformist it is these days, it getting 11 when Kill Bill was also out that year, I think not.

Lord of the Rings is just an epic trilogy. One of the best trilogies out there ever imo. Godfather may be better, but LoTR is just too damn classy. About the guy who said Star Wars was one of the worst movies ever, you cant be serious. Star Wars is legendary (the first trilogy, i'm liking the newer movies but i reckon the earlier ones are just too damn good), very important movie, and for the time they've been made, the special effects are brilliant.

I liked Gladiator aswell. About the Matrix, i reckon the first one was the best of the lot, i liked Reloaded a bit more than Revolutions. The 3rd movie was just not what i was expecting, i mean, i'm not too fond of happy endings, but Neo dying spoilt the fun for me. Still, i enjoyed it a bit, especially the city of machines part.

For me the worst movies i've ever see are definitely Wild Wild West, Batman & Robin and Daredevil.

Originally posted by CalumnCFC
That was 2001 I believe? If so, it was a sh!t year, but no way did Gladiator deserve to pick up five - there's nothing really special about it. I would have given the Best Picture award to Traffic, myself, but I have long ago lost my trust in the oscars. Lord of the Rings was just a typical examply of how crap and conformist it is these days, it getting 11 when Kill Bill was also out that year, I think not.

I loved Gladiator. I thought it was ok for it to win Best Picture. Traffic was also great that year but you cant compare it to an epic film.
both films had great directors, great acting performances, but it came down to the epic aspect of Gladiator.


that year though, I would've given Best Actor to Tom Hanks for Cast Away (Y)

i really dont understand why everyone made a big deal out of Lord of the Rings.

and the fanatics with the whole movie series drive me crazzzy..get over it man

all in all i didnt really like any of them

the lord of the rings is so overated particularly here in Nz where the media portrays them as the greatest films ever made. I found them incredibly boring .

same here...and they're all like 3 hours long..:f***:

I don't like LOTR, but then again a couple of my friends love it to bits :confused:

stop ya bitchin.

Lord of the Rings has some great war scenes and has it's boring bits, but thats like a lot of movies, you guys might not like them but don't treat them like they are the worst films ever made, by far they aren't and you all know that as well as I do.

As I said before, none of you would know what the worst film ever made is, you will all just have opinions on what you have seen - obviously a lot of you don't watch films at all considering you say "STAR WARS" and "MATRIX" are the worst films ever... get f**ked mate, the first matrix was fantastic and the old star wars films are unreal.

Originally posted by Callan
stop ya bitchin.

Lord of the Rings has some great war scenes and has it's boring bits, but thats like a lot of movies, you guys might not like them but don't treat them like they are the worst films ever made, by far they aren't and you all know that as well as I do.

As I said before, none of you would know what the worst film ever made is, you will all just have opinions on what you have seen - obviously a lot of you don't watch films at all considering you say "STAR WARS" and "MATRIX" are the worst films ever... get f**ked mate, the first matrix was fantastic and the old star wars films are unreal. You obviously havent read my posts in this thread? :p

Also, Callan, have you read the Lord of the Rings books? The films are an AWFUL adaptation of the books, puts me to shame, and some aspects are just so pathetic. I know they are good films with good acting, good sets, good special effects, good scenes etc but being the fan I am of the books, I just cant watch them without seeing the millions of inaccuracies and rediculousness's of them - hence I hate the LOTR films.

the first one is crap compared to the book

TROD.

Originally posted by TROD
the first one is crap compared to the book

TROD. They all are

well like i said before, i havent read the other two books, lol

TROD.

Originally posted by CalumnCFC
They all are

Thats what everybody says, but I dont give a F*CK cuz the movies were great :bob: and I aint reading 1200 pages to prove that Im wrong..(N)

Originally posted by hanek45
Thats what everybody says, but I dont give a F*CK cuz the movies were great :bob: and I aint reading 1200 pages to prove that Im wrong..(N) It's worth reading

The movies were great, but no comparisson to the books. It would take 24 hours of movie to come close, I think.

any film that is set in about before 1950, dramas before bout 1950, and romantic 1s.

along came polly is the worst film i have ever seen, and its supposed to be a comedy ?:crazyboy:

Any film that stars Jennifer Lopez, or any recent Ben Affleck film for that matter.
Gigli anyone?

Originally posted by PhiLLer
Any film that stars Jennifer Lopez, or any recent Ben Affleck film for that matter.
Gigli anyone?

....
look back a few pages back..

of course Gigli is here man!! what.!! you think we are stupid..!:confused: :rolleyes: :(

Originally posted by Seggie8
All of the Scream movies
Gigli
The Village
Almost all of the new movies that come out...they're running out of ideas

What movies do u think are the worst? List them here...

I dunno i think somewhere in that list i put Gigli..maybe u never saw it the first time

Originally posted by rpvankasteren
The movies were great, but no comparisson to the books. It would take 24 hours of movie to come close, I think.

I read the books of course and yes, they have LOTS more. but as you said it would take a 20 hour movie to make it complete (instead of the 10 it took) and I think that the 10 Peter Jackson made was perfectly adapted putting in all the necessary to make the story work. you couldnt ask for more IMO.

and just so you know, the mayority of the real fans are happy about the movie.



oh, and Seggie8, complaining about a movie being 3 hours long is one of the stupidiest things Ive ever read :nape: (N)

All the harry pothead films - worst acting i ever saw

Underworld - Fell asleep in the cinema

Spiderman - Most overrated film of all time, loved tha cartoons, tobey maguire is a ****e actor and the to much concentration on graphics than storyline

Daredevil - Much the same as spiderman really

and as for tha people who say godfather 3, they need a cat scan, it was a diasappointing end to the trilogy, but the last sequences where they show the corleone family's life is an amazing ending to a film probably the best ever.

Originally posted by Hakeem
I read the books of course and yes, they have LOTS more. but as you said it would take a 20 hour movie to make it complete (instead of the 10 it took) and I think that the 10 Peter Jackson made was perfectly adapted putting in all the necessary to make the story work. you couldnt ask for more IMO.
(N) Sorry I've gotta disagree with you there, I thought the amount of time he had was adequate, but his actual adaptation very poor. The only reason I watch them is to pick out the inaccuracies.

Originally posted by hanek45
....
look back a few pages back..

of course Gigli is here man!! what.!! you think we are stupid..!:confused: :rolleyes: :(

I never said it wasn't mentioned...:confused:

Originally posted by CalumnCFC
Sorry I've gotta disagree with you there, I thought the amount of time he had was adequate, but his actual adaptation very poor. The only reason I watch them is to pick out the inaccuracies.

ok, but think about it this way: do you think that somebody could possibly make a movie out of the books BETTER than what Peter Jackson did?

Im a fan of the movie first, then the books, but Ive talked to some of the huge tolkien fans, and they've been waiting for a movie for years and years (studios first started talking about making the movie in the late 80s) and they all agree that what PJ did is more than what they've dreamt it was going to be.

then again, he had to leave out lots of stuff so I understand when fans of the books like you didnt like the final product.


btw, I guess you did watch the extended versions of the movies right? cause for me the extended versions add all the stuff that he had to cut from the theatrical cuts, and its all stuff for fans of the books.

I can't watch a movie that's 3 hours and I wish hollywood would become original. There are too many remakes and movies based on books and also more recently video games.

What goes through their mind when they're making a movie based on such things.

BOOKS

Director- Ok let's make a movie about, get this... waldo. A bunch of killer chimps with laser guns look for waldo while he's off travelling the world in 80 days, with guess who... Jackie Chan.

Producer- I like it. Here's some money.

VGs

Let's make a movie about, the sims. A bunch of idiots doing normal boring things! Starring Rob Schneider who thinks he is a... souvlaki.

Producer-I like it. Here's some money.

Reamke

D- I liked Spider-man 2 and it made tons of money, so let's remake it.

P- I like it. Here's some money.

Well it's little different than that, but you get the idea. Frankly this fad is getting tiresome, I'd rather wtach something that's new and original then something old and unoriginal.

The same goes with crappy teen comedies/romances/nothings and those stupid that aren't funny ! SCREAM 1,2,3, HOT SHOTS ! I've never bothered seeing these whole movies, I went back to blockbuster to get my money back (I never got a refund, but I was able to tell them you just lost your #1 customer, after that they took my picture of customer of the year off the wall, those mangie bastards.:f***: ). BUT there have been good films that are funny but stupid, Kung Pow, Airplane, Liam Nielsen films. All great comedies.

you are just putting down everything.
ok, I understand the remakes, and your feellings towards adaptations, but there are lots of original movies too.

and again, your problem with a 3 hour movie is stupid, is for people like you, that dont like long movies, that they make all the videogames and comic adaptations, cause they have less to explai cause you already know about it, and so they make the movies short.
if you cant watch a long movie then just watch TV (N)

Hakeem > Limberopoulos21

:rockman:

nah, I just think he's not even looking for those original movies he wants. they're out there and they're a lot.

Originally posted by Hakeem
ok, but think about it this way: do you think that somebody could possibly make a movie out of the books BETTER than what Peter Jackson did?

Im a fan of the movie first, then the books, but Ive talked to some of the huge tolkien fans, and they've been waiting for a movie for years and years (studios first started talking about making the movie in the late 80s) and they all agree that what PJ did is more than what they've dreamt it was going to be.

then again, he had to leave out lots of stuff so I understand when fans of the books like you didnt like the final product.


btw, I guess you did watch the extended versions of the movies right? cause for me the extended versions add all the stuff that he had to cut from the theatrical cuts, and its all stuff for fans of the books. Ahh, I bet that's the problem. I've only seen the cinema versions. I guess I should see the extended versions before I pass judgement.

Originally posted by dannyeli
Hakeem > Limberopoulos21

:rockman: Stupid comment, everyone has different opinions on films, I think it's great that we have these threads we're everyone gives such good opinions.

I have to agree with Limberopoulos on remakes, some are good but the vast majority, esp the American remakes of foriegn films, butcher them totally and leave people with totally the wrong impression. Get Carter and The Italian Job are examples I always used. People see the remakes, think 'this sucks' and dont see the brilliant originals. If it aint broke dont fix it. The 3 hour comment was dumb though, some of the very best films are 3hrs+. Probably about half my top 20 (see other thread) were that sort of length. If you cant watch a 3 hr film, you should stick with the 'cool' crap aimed at low level audiences.

long movies are cool. some i wish never ended :>

Originally posted by CalumnCFC
I have to agree with Limberopoulos on remakes, some are good but the vast majority, esp the American remakes of foriegn films, butcher them totally and leave people with totally the wrong impression. Get Carter and The Italian Job are examples I always used. People see the remakes, think 'this sucks' and dont see the brilliant originals. If it aint broke dont fix it.

here's my take on the remakes:

if you're going to remake a film, be it foreign or american, that was made 30 year ago or before, then I dont mind that much.
After all, times change, and the stories can be adapted to our times and technology, and that can make the remake a good movie too. even a better one though it hasnt happened much and no movie comes to mind right now.

what I really hate, is this whole stupid idea of remaking asian movies that came out a few yeas ago, or even this year. its totally stupid and they only make it to make money.
just release the movies here in the states instead of making the same movie but with Sarah Michelle Gellar. so stupid :nape:

Santa Claus 2, Dick, and Jason X, and Hollow Man(N)

Hollow Man was certainly ****e aswell.

Evita or what ever its called, thats absolute bollocks!

yeah, Hollow Man (N)

I forgot to mention Dare Devil :nape:

3 hour movie are too long for me, I end up watching them anyways but I need a brake now and then. I just can't sit through a movie for that long. They tend to get boring at times aswell, but for the most part are fun to watch or are atleast interesting.

Too many movies have been based on comicbook characters and books, it has become fad recently. The same goes with "based on a true story" movies, we've got documentaries for that. Yes, indeed some of these movies in these categories are actually pretty good, but I'd rather see more original movies. Fictional movies, something new, not something I've seen before or already know of.


another bad, absolutely terrible, DO NOT WATCH!!!! HIGHLANDER 2! It's a joke that's not funny, like mine. Opera, Sean Connery, the white bros from matrix 2 only crappier and crappiest special effects= CRAP!

Originally posted by CalumnCFC
You obviously havent read my posts in this thread? :p

Also, Callan, have you read the Lord of the Rings books? The films are an AWFUL adaptation of the books, puts me to shame, and some aspects are just so pathetic. I know they are good films with good acting, good sets, good special effects, good scenes etc but being the fan I am of the books, I just cant watch them without seeing the millions of inaccuracies and rediculousness's of them - hence I hate the LOTR films.

So?

Why don't you see it as I do and not a 'remake' of the books but merely 'just a film' ?

That's all it is to me a film, not a book. Imagine if there were no book at all, then would the film be good, of course it would. To many people compare, so the books might be better, so they might have more detail but that doesn't make the movie bad, and everyone is bashing it in here, treating it like it is the 'worst movie' - it's far from it, but it is far from the best - but they are still excellent films: all of them, A LOT better than A LOT of films, even if the book is better.

Titanic... i watched it in 1997 and still can't believe how did that movie earned as much money?

Any horror/action movies which casts were dead or killed one by one and the only survivors are a hot stud with a hot chick . . .

Any Rambo movies after Rambo 1 . . .

And yeah, Highlander 2 was ****in` awful. Immortal men from outer space . . . WTF ??? :|:|:|

ok, yesterday I watched something so horrible is hard to describe: RAPTOR ISLAND :|

it was a made for cable (Sci-Fi channel) movie with Lorenzo Lamas as a NAVY Seal going in a rescue mission to an island full of dinosaurs :p

the freaking velociraptors looked like taken out of a Turok game and the rest of the effects were totally awful :p (N)(N)(N)

Last night there was a film on TV here which starred Chuck Norris it was called "The President's Man". The plot is a typical stupid plot where Chuck Norris is an ex-SEAL who has to train some younger guy to become a fighting machine (which features all the typical exercises). Then the first lady is kidnapped by some absolutely pathetic group of terrorists and of course Chuck Norris now has to re-enter the game and save her bla bla bla...TERRIBLE!:crazyboy:

Originally posted by Hakeem
ok, yesterday I watched something so horrible is hard to describe: RAPTOR ISLAND :|

it was a made for cable (Sci-Fi channel) movie with Lorenzo Lamas as a NAVY Seal going in a rescue mission to an island full of dinosaurs :p

the freaking velociraptors looked like taken out of a Turok game and the rest of the effects were totally awful :p (N)(N)(N)

lol, ever seen carnosaur? Terrorist steal Uranium find out they actually stole dinos.(H)

hollow man wasnt that bad i mean the first 30 min was ok, but jason x and tuxedo are soo bad probably 2 of the worst

what I don't understand about LOTR and HarryPotter is that studios go to all this trouble to replicate Norse, Greek and Egyptian mythological creatures in these sh*tty scripted stories...


why don't they just make movies about Norse Greek and Egyptian mythology........those stories are 10x better than these crappy adaptations....

armageddon
i hate that movie
the end of the world is near and what do they??
they send some guys from a oil platform into space... yeah right :rolleyes: :|

not to forget to mention aero smith, bruce willis being an astronaught. On the plus side Steve Bushemie. He deserves more credit as an actor, odd but enjoyable to watch.

Ohh and most movies starring singers. Lopez and mandy are decent and not bad either.:hump: But snoop dogg, the american idols, that guy with the mole- Inglesias, Ice cube (decent in babershop and next friday, but terrible most of the other times), should give up. Snoop dogg would be good only for a cameo or a not very important role.

That's my two cents on terrible movies.

just saw barbershop 2 (liked first) and it was pretty bad. Not worst ever, but still bad.

Originally posted by Callan
So?

Why don't you see it as I do and not a 'remake' of the books but merely 'just a film' ?

That's all it is to me a film, not a book. Imagine if there were no book at all, then would the film be good, of course it would. To many people compare, so the books might be better, so they might have more detail but that doesn't make the movie bad, and everyone is bashing it in here, treating it like it is the 'worst movie' - it's far from it, but it is far from the best - but they are still excellent films: all of them, A LOT better than A LOT of films, even if the book is better. Perhaps, I still feel there would be flaws in it even if the book was taken out of the equation, but they certainly are very watchable with some momentous scenes and sets, and it's really unfair of me to comment without seeing the full, uncut versions, so I take it back :p

Originally posted by Hakeem
here's my take on the remakes:

if you're going to remake a film, be it foreign or american, that was made 30 year ago or before, then I dont mind that much.
After all, times change, and the stories can be adapted to our times and technology, and that can make the remake a good movie too. even a better one though it hasnt happened much and no movie comes to mind right now.

what I really hate, is this whole stupid idea of remaking asian movies that came out a few yeas ago, or even this year. its totally stupid and they only make it to make money.
just release the movies here in the states instead of making the same movie but with Sarah Michelle Gellar. so stupid :nape: The thing is though, lots of the old films they remake are brilliant, with absolutely no need of remaking. In my opinion they would be better off just re-releasing the old ones - not enough old films in cinemas anyway. I am not opposed to remakes, I personally have written a screenplay for a remake of Catch 22, a fantastic book but sh!te film, but I hate the way all the remakes these days seem to remake brilliant old films into crappy new ones, when it should be the otherway round. Another good example is Nikita, remade into The Assassin. They didnt even credit Nikita or anything, yet it was such a blatant and inferior copy to the original. True the original was French, but there was a brilliantly dubbed edition which seemed English, who those who dont like subtitles, so even that's not really an excuse.

Originally posted by Sepp2in1
armageddon
i hate that movie
the end of the world is near and what do they??
they send some guys from a oil platform into space... yeah right :rolleyes: :|

come on. I agree that the whole idea is stupid, but the movie was very entertaining, great special effects, lots of comedy, Steve Buscemi AND Liv Tyler. you cant go wrong with that :hump:

Originally posted by CalumnCFC
The thing is though, lots of the old films they remake are brilliant, with absolutely no need of remaking. In my opinion they would be better off just re-releasing the old ones - not enough old films in cinemas anyway. I am not opposed to remakes, I personally have written a screenplay for a remake of Catch 22, a fantastic book but sh!te film, but I hate the way all the remakes these days seem to remake brilliant old films into crappy new ones, when it should be the otherway round. Another good example is Nikita, remade into The Assassin. They didnt even credit Nikita or anything, yet it was such a blatant and inferior copy to the original. True the original was French, but there was a brilliantly dubbed edition which seemed English, who those who dont like subtitles, so even that's not really an excuse.

you're right, complaining about subtitles is almost as stupid as complaining for a movie being long (N)

Originally posted by Hakeem
you're right, complaining about subtitles is almost as stupid as complaining for a movie being long (N) I prefer watching a film subtitled than dubbed personally. Same with people who complain about black and white films, just stupid.

Originally posted by Hakeem
come on. I agree that the whole idea is stupid, but the movie was very entertaining, great special effects, lots of comedy, Steve Buscemi AND Liv Tyler. you cant go wrong with that :hump: I saw it on an aeroplane, best thing I ever saw on a plane, anyway I was a bit jetlagged so I didnt enjoy it much, but I seem to remember it being quite good. Buscemi is a legend anyway (Y)

Originally posted by CalumnCFC
I prefer watching a film subtitled than dubbed personally. Same with people who complain about black and white films, just stupid.

dubbed films suck completely.
watch Pinoccio (2003) with Roberto Benigni (in italian) and the movie is horrible, but watch it dubbed to english you'll want to kill yourself :nape:

Originally posted by Hakeem
dubbed films suck completely.
watch Pinoccio (2003) with Roberto Benigni (in italian) and the movie is horrible, but watch it dubbed to english you'll want to kill yourself :nape: Cant be all bad if it has Roberto Begnini in it. He is a great actor, brilliant performances in Night on Earth and Down By Law. He is who I would most like to play the protagonist in the screenplay I'm writing at the moment.

watch Pinoccio then.
though being a big fan as you say, maybe you wont dislike it as much as I did (:/)

Originally posted by Hakeem
watch Pinoccio then.
though being a big fan as you say, maybe you wont dislike it as much as I did (:/) Maybe not, but it doesnt sound worth watching to me. Anyway, I'm off for the night. Stick me on your MSN if you want, it' been cool talking with ya.

Anything dubbed is terrible, I even rather watched the Chinese kung-fu movies in Chinese and have English subtitles than have it dubbed.

Anyone ever watched Friends or Fraiser ever dubbed in German or French, terrible.
I watched a bit of James Bond dubbed in German, it's terrible, James Bond speaking German c'mon!:kader:

Originally posted by PhiLLer
Anything dubbed is terrible, I even rather watched the Chinese kung-fu movies in Chinese and have English subtitles than have it dubbed.

Anyone ever watched Friends or Fraiser ever dubbed in German or French, terrible.
I watched a bit of James Bond dubbed in German, it's terrible, James Bond speaking German c'mon!:kader: Especially when it's an actor you know. In Nikita, Jean Reno (an actor I know well and like alot) is dubbed over with a voice nothing like his, it's really awful because you know it's wrong and would sound so much better with his real voice, now I dont even bother even trying the dubbed version.

'Kung-Pao: Enter the Fist' its dubbed and its excellent (H)

I remeber that many said this movie was terrible (media), but I think it was funny. Freedy got fingered. It was so stupid, so random, I loved it. Just great.

Tom- I'm gunna make you proud, dad.
[starts driving away, brakes and honks at a senior citizen who is about to cross]
Tom- GET THE F*CK OUT OF THE WAY.
[continues driving]

Tom- [Dressed in his dad's suit, backwards] I'm the backwards man, the backwards man, I can run back as fast as you can.

Dad- If this was Pakistan, you'd be sewing soccer balls.
:rofl:

That film made me cry because I laughed so much.:rockman:

Longshot.

Oh my god. That movie is so terrible it's actually funny. You MUST see it. The movie is absolutely terrible, it must be the worst movie ever. I watched it on TMC coz I had nothing better to do :(

The movie has everything...

- 1995 style long hair
- random basketball game
- slow motion moments
- Karaoke competition
- cameos from NSync
- cameo from The Rock
- everything else that makes a bad movie

No really, this movie is so bad it's actually worth seeing.

This is probably the best review I could find:

Why, oh why did they make this movie?!? That is what you'll be asking yourself throughout the entire flick (and yes, you may just sit through the whole thing out of sheer "can't help but stare at the car wreck" amazement). From misplaced cameos, HORRIBLE writing and no-talent acting to having to actually look at Lou Pearlman in more than one scene (the man behind it all), you may just find yourself in a pool of your own vomit after 20 minutes. Put it this way, it's supposed to be a comedy, but fails so miserably that even my digital TV guide lists it as a Drama. But hey, everything is worth something, right? *For some real fun, try watching this one with a bunch of friends - ON MUTE - and make up the dialog yourself! (Who needs Pictionary, anyway?)

See this movie :hump: If you have not seen this movie, you do not know what a bad movie is.

http://www.alphamusic-shop.com/cover/5990353.jpg

This is our protagonist :D:

Originally posted by Hakeem
'Kung-Pao: Enter the Fist' its dubbed and its excellent (H)

One of the funniest and actually successful dubbed movie..not counting Rumble in the Bronx with Jacky Chan.

...wow this thread is still alive :rockman: niiice

A N C H O R M A N ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

:kader: :kader: :kader:

who is it who does the reviews???


worst movie ever...didn't laugh once and walked out half way through

couldn't smoke enough dope to make this piece of sh*t funny

oh yeah...Hakeem


never will listen to your movie advice again


not that you care



:ewan:

i heard it was really funny, i never watched it myself but im sure will farell did some funny **** in it

Anchorman wasn't bad, but it was wayyyyyyyyyyy overrated

what about Buble Boy??



I HATED that movie..I HATE that guy..

I HATE the bubble.. I HATE the ending..


:-puke:

:nape: bubble boy..:nape:

ya movies with wierd titles like that are ones that i dont go near

Originally posted by hanek45
what about Buble Boy??



I HATED that movie..I HATE that guy..

I HATE the bubble.. I HATE the ending..


:-puke:

:nape: bubble boy..:nape:

oh yes that was real :sb9:

Originally posted by Solo Inter
oh yeah...Hakeem


never will listen to your movie advice again


not that you care



:ewan: I'm sure that will keep him up at night :rolleyes:

Originally posted by Solo Inter
oh yeah...Hakeem

never will listen to your movie advice again

not that you care

:ewan:

I loved it, some people didnt. who cares :ewan:



also, I did like BubbleBoy.
it was pretty stupid yeah, but I found it funny anyway :p

the ending of BubbleBoy was a joke on another movie. cant remember which one though