View Full Version : CM5 is pathetic
Magic_Mushrooms 21-03-2005, 10:41:AM Damn, did Eidos killed the name Championship Manager!!
The game is awful, it fells like an alpha with minimal data base, and 95% of players got wrong stats, most of the teams got ****ed up colors/themes, and the whole game feels just very very pathetic, something even Activision Value wouldnt release.
Only a true fool would buy this when you have a masterpiece like FM2005.
1/10 score.
Rocky 21-03-2005, 01:31:PM how did you get it you live in the US. i still didnt get from play.com yet:confused:
Zlatan 21-03-2005, 07:36:PM <Deleted content for semi-infringement of rule #3. Don't do that, Max>
Zlatan 21-03-2005, 11:06:PM Sorry Ruud couldn't resist
:p
Originally posted by Zlatan
Sorry Ruud couldn't resist
:p
dont do it again or ill get Rony to eat you :)
TROD.
Sir Calumn 21-03-2005, 11:31:PM Originally posted by Magic_Mushrooms
Damn, did Eidos killed the name Championship Manager!!
The game is awful, it fells like an alpha with minimal data base, and 95% of players got wrong stats, most of the teams got ****ed up colors/themes, and the whole game feels just very very pathetic, something even Activision Value wouldnt release.
Only a true fool would buy this when you have a masterpiece like FM2005.
1/10 score. I totally disagree with you :p I hope you haven't got the patch yet.
There is no way FM2005 can be considered a masterpiece either.
Magic_Mushrooms 22-03-2005, 01:05:AM Originally posted by CalumnCFC
There is no way FM2005 can be considered a masterpiece either.
Next to this, it is a master piece.
But hey, if you like it good for you, to me its nothing like CM series, and to be honest, even I can make a better game then CM5.
Magic_Mushrooms 22-03-2005, 01:07:AM Originally posted by italianstallion
how did you get it you live in the US. i still didnt get from play.com yet:confused:
I got it somehow, but then when a realized what kind a peice of **** it is I deleted it, waste of hard disk space.
And buy this ?? are you out of your mind, I wouldnt buy this for a penny, and if YOU bought/ordered it ..... you got owned man, you wasted money on one of the worst managment games in the history of human kind.
<NO warez, warning>
PSVFOREVER 22-03-2005, 03:00:AM there are worse things to spend your money on
*cough* tcm *cough*
Magic_Mushrooms 22-03-2005, 03:17:AM TCM is miles better then CM 5, even tho TCM is also huge pile of crap.
Sir Calumn 22-03-2005, 03:26:AM No way, CM5 is better than TCM in every respect.
This is how I would rate the CM and FMs to date:
CM01/02 "The Great CM" - 9/10
CM4 - 6/10
CM03/04 - 7/10
FM2005 - 8/10
CM5 - 7/10
Where as TCM would be about 4/10.
rpvankasteren 22-03-2005, 03:35:AM The tactics engine surprises me a bit, it's better than I expected, but the reaction of the players to the ball seems to be off. It feels as if they only respond when the ball stops moving after the ball deflects off a gk or other player.
I wouldn't go as far as giving this game a 7, though. But a 6 does seem deserved. The research behind this game is way too flawed for a football sim that is meant to be realistic.
Sir Calumn 22-03-2005, 03:43:AM Yeah, I noticed that with the players too, sometimes I couldnt even tell who's move it was because they reacted so slow. The goalkeepers are hillarious too, they move really slow til the last minute when they suddenly teleport to the right place to stop the goal.
But as I said in my review, the tactics and speed being possibly the best yet is what merits the game getting a 7.
rpvankasteren 22-03-2005, 03:47:AM I take 3 full points off for the data alone. Even the EA data is way better.
Sir Calumn 22-03-2005, 03:54:AM Yeah, looks to me like the data research hasnt extended beyond looking at the squadlists on the club websites.
rpvankasteren 22-03-2005, 03:57:AM Only for (English) top teams. For other teams, they only have the names correct for the 1st team players.
Even the top teams have loads of generic contractable players.
Magic_Mushrooms 22-03-2005, 04:22:AM Originally posted by rpvankasteren
I take 3 full points off for the data alone. Even the EA data is way better.
Exactly!
It seems like they randomized the data 98% of the time, and half of the players in the data base are wrong position.
Not to mention even some of the NATIONAL teams have squads from the 90's, with players who no longer play.
The only thing I do give credit to Eidos for is for having balls to release this.
Sir Calumn 22-03-2005, 06:08:AM Yeah, but while the match engine and databases are major let downs, even you must admit that the speed and tactics engines are major good points, with everything else in between. Alright, maybe a 7 is a little generous, but definately a 6.
willem 29-03-2005, 11:30:AM When I signed up with Club Brugge, the board said I had to battle bravely against relegation. :S
da_gunners_14 03-04-2005, 06:14:AM lol....the game is fu_cked up
good thing i didn't buy it
da_gunners_14 03-04-2005, 06:18:AM How can cm5 be worse than cm03/04,
cm5 is it is the latest shouldn't it be the improved version
wat has happened :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
rpvankasteren 03-04-2005, 08:44:AM FM 2005 is the improved version of CM 03/04. CM5 is a completely new game.
Zlatan 03-04-2005, 11:34:AM Maybe we should make a forum wide announcement that CM 5 IS NOT THE SUCCESSOR OF CM 03/04
:kader:
Maybe we should make a forum wide announcement that CM 5 IS NOT THE SUCCESSOR OF CM 03/04
:kader:
ive done it about 30 times
TROD.
|
|