View Full Version : Members only?
Following the theft of several sigs by someone from another board, is there any chance that either the whole forum could be made members only or that it could be made so that only members could see images posted? I know this isn't the first time sigs have been stolen and I'm sure there must have been incidents where kits, boots etc have also been taken.
Also, another query on a completely different subject but not worth its own thread, why is Calumn allowed to keep a sig over the 300x100 px size limit?
Joe Star 22-07-2005, 10:35:AM Read what his sig says mate ;)
Stotty 22-07-2005, 11:38:AM i understand what your saying, but who's the say the guy that is stealing all our sigs isn't registered here?
Ubik Valis 22-07-2005, 12:11:PM Also, another query on a completely different subject but not worth its own thread, why is Calumn allowed to keep a sig over the 300x100 px size limit?
1) He's a mod
2) We're afraid he'll start a fascist uprising if we ask him to remove it.
Sir Calumn 22-07-2005, 05:30:PM Following the theft of several sigs by someone from another board, is there any chance that either the whole forum could be made members only or that it could be made so that only members could see images posted? I know this isn't the first time sigs have been stolen and I'm sure there must have been incidents where kits, boots etc have also been taken.
Also, another query on a completely different subject but not worth its own thread, why is Calumn allowed to keep a sig over the 300x100 px size limit? Stop being a little bitch and complaing about things that dont affect you remotely, my sig is much smaller than pretty much all the others in filesize and hence it does not affect load times anymore than anything else. Is there any point in your wingeing other than pure vindictiveness?
purely for the fact that we believe calumn is loved by so many members that a decision to destroy his thread may result in a revolt by the members of the forum. Simple really.
TROD.
Nimreitz 26-07-2005, 07:37:AM Who cares if someone takes your sig. 99% of them are just a bunch of dumb pictures of Frank Lampard or Cristiano Ronaldo together with some crappy text with a user name or something. It's not like it's significant art or anything.
On a related note I had an idea to steal a sig from a different SG member every week, but decided against it because some of you dooshes might develop a yeast infection.
Ubik Valis 26-07-2005, 07:53:AM You have my blessings Dan :D:fool: (C)
On a related note I had an idea to steal a sig from a different SG member every week, but decided against it because some of you dooshes might develop a yeast infection.
a truly WONDERFUL idea. :rockman:
TROD.
but who is calumn. Is it that guy that used to post in the CM forum? (6)
Sir Calumn 02-08-2005, 06:32:PM but who is calumn. Is it that guy that used to post in the CM forum? (6) Nah, this is a totally different Calumn (C)
Avalanche 03-08-2005, 01:19:AM On a related note I had an idea to steal a sig from a different SG member every week, but decided against it because some of you dooshes might develop a yeast infection.
I'll guard my posts with AK47-toting mercenar.......eh, whatever.
Anyway, have some popcorn Mr. Reitz. It's on the house. :corn:
hanek45 05-08-2005, 05:30:AM champ, just the fact that you checked Callums sig size makes you lame. (6)
i wonder how many users sig you've checked :hit:
he probably spent as much time looking, then thinking, then posting as you did making that post, never mind all the thought that went into it :(
TROD.
That guy won't show his face again.
champ, just the fact that you checked Callums sig size makes you lame. (6)
i wonder how many users sig you've checked :hit:
Having made a large number of sigs that are 300px by 100px I can tell just by looking at it whether it fits those dimensions or not. I didn't check the file size if that's what you mean.
ttwellman 09-08-2005, 06:18:PM You can't win :D
|