View Full Version : Fulham part with Coleman


Help?
11-04-2007, 04:15:AM
Wow, i'm pretty surprised with this to be honest. Sure Fulham haven't been having the greatest of years, but i thought they were just unlucky. Some people don't like Coleman, but i always thought that he adds something different to the premiership and also a nice professional as well. They can't buy new players and the new manager won't be very familiar with the new team. If they were gonna sack him, they should have done it in January, but so late in the season it can actually back fire.
























Truthfully, i don't know why i actually care after CL

Thelonious
11-04-2007, 04:21:AM
This is a stupid move, sacking the manager at this time is almost a certain sign of relegation, a new manager can't achieve anything in this time. Though I'm picking Wigan, Sheffield and Watford to go down.

shadowofanubis6
11-04-2007, 04:22:AM
It's a shame, I liked coleman

Bobby
11-04-2007, 04:22:AM
Strange move, I thought he'd done alright considering what he's working with.

Hopeunited
11-04-2007, 04:25:AM
I agree with Bobby. Fulham is a small team with a tight budget, but Coleman has managed quite well I think. It's a pretty stupid move by Fulham. And I liked Chris Coleman as a manager.

Seán D
11-04-2007, 02:28:PM
I think they are looking for the few wins bringing in a new manager usually brings. The players have to prove themselves to a new manager, but their remaining games are tough, and the only reason I'd like them to stay up is Brian McBride now :(

Avalanche
11-04-2007, 02:57:PM
Cookie's sacking is yet another reason why Clint Dempsey made a mistake when he moved to the Cottage in January. It wouldn't surprise me that by this time next year, Deuce returns to MLS with his tail between his legs.

TheBizkit03
11-04-2007, 09:37:PM
I remember about 5/6 years ago when their owner said they would be the Man Utd of the south, Ha.

dipset
11-04-2007, 09:49:PM
so gay, the stupid owner Faisal of Saudi Arabia or something doesnt even give them money to spend and hes FREAAAKKINNN LOADED . Very stupid especially at this point of the season, Coleman was doign a good job with the budget he had . The owner is just thier for the quick bucks, hes gonna sell the team triple its value in a few yrs. The GUy is loaded and cant even invest in players the dude is selfish. pffff

Seán D
11-04-2007, 10:05:PM
Al Fayed spends a lot of his money investigating what happened to his son and Princess Diana.

Jedi Mind Trick
11-04-2007, 10:09:PM
sad to see coleman go because i thought he was one of the more underrated managers. he made the most of the situation he had.

hope the americans will still be in the rotation.

rony31
11-04-2007, 10:28:PM
yet another manager bites the dust right after a City loss (H)

Bonzi
12-04-2007, 06:51:PM
Bad move. Fulham used to have one of the weakest squads of the league during past years, but they always managed to perform as solid as they could. And there were much of Coleman's services.

fender
13-04-2007, 07:32:AM
I they should have at least stuck with him till the end of the season, right now its just a sinking ship without a captain.

Zlatan
14-04-2007, 01:20:PM
What happened to the times when Fulham was shouting they were going to attack the top of the premiership?

Voltaic Borusse
15-04-2007, 05:00:AM
Sad to see one of the more likeable managers gone.

bjmenge
15-04-2007, 05:21:AM
I liked Coleman, but if this means McBride returns to Columbus sooner, than I'm all for it.