which national teams would you place in top 10?

Scotland

#1

Scotland as number 1 are you crazy!

australia #1
new zealand #2
only kidding

What about Belgium?
No, i'm not kidding,
check out these results:

Holland-Belgium 5-5
Belgium-Marocco 4-0
England-Belgium 2-1
Italy -Belgium 1-3

Aha!!!

pretty cool that Belgium, who is your best player anyway.

1-Brasil
2-Spain
3-Netherlands
4-Argentina
5-Italy
6-Czech Republic
7-Germany
8-France
9-England
10-Colombia

1.Brazil
2.Spain
3.The Netherlands
4.Czech Republic
5.Argentina
6.Italy
7.Sweden
8.France
9.Colombia
10.England

By the way Scotland were better than England in the playoffs!

[This message has been edited by Tony Trickyfinger (edited 11-19-1999).]

How does england make it into the top 10 ? Their ****in useless, unless they are at home they can't win anything and they can't even win at home anymore.

englands last competitive game at Wembley and they get stuffed by Scotland.

Su-****in-perb!!!

If Ingerlund Ingerlund are in the top ten then Scotland also have to be in the top 10.

What about Romania ? Great team (of course , my country =o))))
Really ,we are prepeared to win Euro2000.If we won't , then the Czech will.
First team in the world is Holland , no doubt.

#1-Italy

1. Brazil
2. Spain
3. Argentina
4. The Netherlands
5. Czech Rep
7. Italy
8. Sweden
9. Denmark
10. Germany

left overs: Portugal, England, Romania, Yugoslavia, Norway and Belgium.

1. Brazil
2. Spain
3. Argentina
4. France
5. The Netherlands
6. Czech Rep
7. Italy
8. Sweden
9. Denmark
10. Germany

left overs: Portugal, England, Romania, Yugoslavia, Norway and Belgium.

1. Brazil
2. Spain
3. Argentina
4. France
5. The Netherlands
6. Czech Rep
7. Italy
8. Sweden
9. Denmark
10. Germany

left overs: Portugal, England, Romania, Yugoslavia, Norway and Belgium.

Preciseley

If Ingerlund are up there

we should be too.

England with scholes - good
" without " - crap

Red_Devil ,I dont want to offend you but when Belgium beat Italy ,they deserved it ,but you gotta know for a fact many players on the italian side was missing like ,C.Vieri,P.Maldini,F.Cannavaro,A.Conte,
A.Nesta.If they would have been playing that game maybe the outcome would have been different .

Italy82, i don't want to offend you either http://www.soccergaming.com/ubb/smile.gif
but when a team plays with that much lack of spirit, the players don't matter;

eg:
All the players of the belgian team are the same as before, only their spirit has become better

Don't blaim it on the players that weren't there, we've played other good games against england, marocco and holland, so...
My advice; get rid of that italian coach!!!

Current form this is top 10:

1) BRAZIL
2) HOLLAND
3) ARGENTINA
4) FRANCE
5) SPAIN
6) ITALY
7) GERMANY
8) SWEDEN
9) PORTUGAL
10) ROMANIA

What about Slovenia ? They came to euro 2000 by beating Ukraine. By the way, did someone saw that goal from Mile Acimovic the Slovenian player. It was from half court

1- SCOTLAND
2- Holland
3- Nigeria
4- England (U must admit there good)
5- Brazil
6- Sweeden
7- France
8- Italy
9- Argentina (Batistuta sucks though)
10- Australia

I put England on the top ten 'cos i didn't want to get you comin' after me.
But actually,the yugos or the scots should have been there.
Maybe Croatia too.

FBTim, whats up with you and Scholes?
He ain't that good. The thing that i will remember about him won't be his 2 goals against the scots, it'll be his tackle against Hakan Mild of Sweden.

All of you are bunch of kids and looks like you never watched soccer and three rising or currect superstars that are big part

1. Holland (Davids, Overmars, Berkamp)
2. Italy (Vieri, Del Piero, Buffon)
3. Brasil (Juninho, Rivaldo, R.Carlos)
4. Spain (Hierro, Raul, Morientes)
5. Argentina (Batistuta, Veron, Ortega)
6. France (Zidane, Anelka, Desailly)
7. Croatia (Suker, Boksic, Jarni)
8. England (Owen, Scholes, Beckam)
9. Yugoslavia (Mihajlovic, Stankovic,Jugovic)
10. Sweden (two words: KENNET ANDERSON)
11. Germany (Bierhoff and Kahn)
12. Ireland (ROY and Robbie Keane)
13. Denmark (succeed because of teamwork)
14. Romania (Illie, PETRESCU, hagi)
15. Portugal (Figo & Rui Costa)

Butts how can you say England are 8th without putting Scotland in? The three English players you mentioned were taken care of so well when Scotland and England played it was if they weren't there. Scotland are missing just one player from becoming one of the best teams in the world but they are definitly better than England at the moment.

Italy for No. 1 of the WORLD.
And I agree with dirk diggler England are crap right so stop putting them in top 10.

Last game at twin towers
England 0-1 Scotland

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
YOU'LL NEVER HERE THE LAST OF IT

1-Brazil
2-france
3-Holland
4-england
5-Argentina
6-Croatia
7-Mexico
8-Nigeria
9-Belguim
10-Egypt

First of all, why do you think Scotland is better than England just because they won those two games. I am not saying that Scotland isnt better, but two games arent anything. It's like saying Croatia is the 3rd nation in the world because they got the 3rd in world cup, but they are not, there a about 5 nations that are realy better in quality. OR BUlgaria in 1994, THey werent 4th in OVERall quality. I know what I am talking about, and the only things you could argue with me is the order of top 3 teams. By the way guys, I think the countries that really have a shot at winning euro are italy, holland, sweden, yugoslavia, spain.
Dont tell me what about france and enlgand, i dont hate those two countries, in fact both countries have players who are one of my fav players, OH ONE THING seaman really sux, and france and england can not win, i watched them in the world cup, they played good, but the countries that played them didn't play to their fullest or didn't have luck. SO THOSE FIVE COUNTRIES are my candidates ITALY, SPAIN, YUGOSLAVIA, HOLLAND, and SWEDEN. I WISH UKRAINE WAS IN SCHEVCHENKO WILL BE EITHER 99 or 2000 fifa player of the eyar

You are the man alfiee GO OCEANIA.
We (New Zealand and Australia) are good enough to have an automatic placing in the world cup.
I'm a New Zealander and I think Australia would beat quite a few teams at the world cup when they have their best X1 they are very good.

1.- Italy
2.- Brazil
3.- Netherlands
4.- Argentina
5.- Czech Republic
6.- Spain
7.- Norway
8.- Sweden
9.- Portugal
10.- Germany

1. ARGENTINA
2. ARGENTINA
3.ARGENTINA
4.ARGENTINA
5.ARGENTINA
6.ARGENTINA
7. ARGENTINA
8.ARGENTINA
9.ARGENTINA
10.ARGENTINA

1-Brazil
2-france
3-Holland
4-england
5-Argentina
6-Croatia
7-Mexico-Italie
8-Nigeria
9-egypt

Butts,
Right we didn`t win both games, where have you been. We lost the first 2 - 0 and won the second 1 - 0. But we were all over them in both games. How can you say Seaman sucks if they didn`t have him between the sticks it would be us scots in Euro 2000.