Please give a better scale for the team ratings ( shooting, speed, defence,... )because in FIFA 99, we can only compare the stronger teams. The weaker teams and the not-so-weak teams will all have the same ratings ( 1 out of 10 in all ratings ) no matter how big the diffrence of the players' skills are.

About the simulated results in FIFA 99, I rarely saw a team scoring more than 4 goals in 1 game and the score between a weak team and a stronger team are often very close ( eg. 1-2, 2-3, 3-4 ). FIFA 2000 should improve on these. For example, sometimes a strong team should beat a weak team with a 10-0 score.

When watching a computer vs computer game, I found that the computer rarely scores in a 6 minute game ( the match often ends at 0-0 ).

Yeah! I agree with you, but there is one more bug...

Away team usually wins! Is it real?

It's really interesting what you say.


[This message has been edited by MANU (edited 08-20-1999).]

I agree 1000 time with you,FS FAN.About the difference beetween teams,we can see a good team like Totthenam in England in last positions of the League!!!!! with very good players like David Ginola(best player of the league during the last league),Anderton,Les Ferdinand,Iversen,Saul Campbell,Stefan Freund or Alan Nielsen.It the same thing with Herta berlin whereas this team is qualifying for the Champions' League this year!!!!!So,I agree with you on the problem of the score in the computer matches.The score is too often 0-0 during a league or 1-0 and I always finish with the best attack and the worst defense comparating with poor teams as Lorient or Toulouse in the french league.WE'd like Manchester Utd crushes Bradford or Sunderland 5 or 6-0 in fifa 2000!!!!!Excuse me for my grammar and the language but I'm french and I don't speak very well english.Bye.