There are many things that are really good about this game, but here are some things that really suck.

1. when playing in 3d players almost never ever head the ball. Why? this sucks. In real life players normally head the ball towards goal from corner kicks, in the game the never do it.

2. Players never get called for hand ball in 3d, but on running commentary mode they do.

3. a lot more goals are scored in 3d mode then in commentary mode. that blows.

I dont think these things will be fixed for the real version. So i'm not gonna buy it because CM 2003 will be so much better.

Originally posted by Joao Pinto
There are many things that are really good about this game, but here are some things that really suck.

1. when playing in 3d players almost never ever head the ball. Why? this sucks. In real life players normally head the ball towards goal from corner kicks, in the game the never do it.

2. Players never get called for hand ball in 3d, but on running commentary mode they do.

3. a lot more goals are scored in 3d mode then in commentary mode. that blows.

I dont think these things will be fixed for the real version. So i'm not gonna buy it because CM 2003 will be so much better.
1. Players do head the ball in 3d mode. So stop whining when u havent even really played the game.
2. yea this is true...
3. actually no there are more goals in TEXT MODE than in 3d mode. I screwed up the squad for westbrom and in text mode versus millwall I got 39-0 but in 3d mode vs Sunderland (better team right?) I only got 7-0.

39-0? What kind of a soccer game is this? Either you suck or the game sucks, cause even idoits dont loose 39-0.

Put a hung over pub team up against a premiership team and see the scoreline...
Which is pretty much what flamehawk did, playing youth kids out of position and a striker in goal etc...

Also it is CM4 not CM2003...

CM 4, CM 2003, whats the difference? And if you honestly believe a premiership side or any side could win 39-0 you've never watched soccer. 15-0, maybe... but 39-0? thats almost a goal every two minutes! If there was no goalkeeper in goal than this score could be reached, otherwise get real.

Originally posted by Joao Pinto
CM 4, CM 2003, whats the difference? And if you honestly believe a premiership side or any side could win 39-0 you've never watched soccer. 15-0, maybe... but 39-0? thats almost a goal every two minutes! If there was no goalkeeper in goal than this score could be reached, otherwise get real.
Ofcourse itz reachable. use your head. No goalie, screwed up formation. I mean imagine a youth team with each of them in wrong positions. All on the left or right of the field ofcourse u can get 39-0.

At least play the game before you criticise.

end of the story!

Originally posted by Joao Pinto
CM 4, CM 2003, whats the difference? And if you honestly believe a premiership side or any side could win 39-0 you've never watched soccer. 15-0, maybe... but 39-0? thats almost a goal every two minutes! If there was no goalkeeper in goal than this score could be reached, otherwise get real.

Yep never watched a game in my life me, have no idea what I am talking about...
Jeez people, I played for a kickabout team against some semi-pros and they beat us 28-1. And those were guys who still had to work for a living to pay the bills, not Premiership players...

Ofcourse itz reachable. use your head. No goalie, screwed up formation. I mean imagine a youth team with each of them in wrong positions. All on the left or right of the field ofcourse u can get 39-0.

the key to this is no goalie. Even with players in the wrong position 39-0 is still unrealistic. And why would u play with no goalie? My point is that there seems to be way more goals scored in 3d mode. And players rarely head that ball. it sucks. I bought Mario Jardel in this game and he scores crackers from outside the box! Jardel? he scores 99% of the time with his head. He doesn't even attempt to head the ball in on 3d mode, nor does anyone else.

I've noticed the occaisonal header in midfield (like 1 every 3 matches), this is not soccer.

Originally posted by Joao Pinto
Ofcourse itz reachable. use your head. No goalie, screwed up formation. I mean imagine a youth team with each of them in wrong positions. All on the left or right of the field ofcourse u can get 39-0.

the key to this is no goalie. Even with players in the wrong position 39-0 is still unrealistic. And why would u play with no goalie? My point is that there seems to be way more goals scored in 3d mode. And players rarely head that ball. it sucks. I bought Mario Jardel in this game and he scores crackers from outside the box! Jardel? he scores 99% of the time with his head. He doesn't even attempt to head the ball in on 3d mode, nor does anyone else.

I've noticed the occaisonal header in midfield (like 1 every 3 matches), this is not soccer.
I played with no goalie cuz I was taking screenshot for site and decided to make fun of Westbrom! And no 3d mode has way less goals.

Pinto is gay.

Look at Australia's scores in world cup qualification.

Now be quiet.

It is a game.

I just wish Australia had have kept those scores going in the real qualifier against uruguay.:mad: I am *happy* :)