This is regarding a comment you made earlier: "Really, EA are moneygrabbers who can't make a decent football game to save their lives."

Compared to the previous version of FIFA, I think FIFA 2003 is a great game. Please tell me in your opinion what is wrong with this game. Contact me via ICQ or Messenger.

i think EA are the best Graphics company out there..i mean..every year their graphics for all of their games are simply brilliant..it wouldn't surprise me if in 5-10 years they'll reach 'absolute realism' where u wouldn't be able to tell the difference between real life and the game...

the bad side to ea though...is they're habbit in making glitches and ..not so much as 'bad' gameplay..just not the best...i don't really hate them..since they've made so many sport games..and driving games and dozens of other types of games..so they do have a lot of standards to live up to..and EA trying to do a game in a country where some ppl don't even know what a soccerball is..it is a bit challenging...since that's where they expect to make the most money out of their games...

i do agree that right now...EA have fallen behind in the Gameplay department compared to other companys..but i do believe that given a few more years..EA WILL get better in that category

i know this thread was meant for JJ..but that's my opinion :)

I don't agree EA are money grabbers, if they were just in it for the money why invest so many resources into fifa 2003.

To make it they had to steal the best programmers/designers away from their other games titles.


The story in the past would be different.

the fact still remains though, fifa 2003 is a terrible game!

No, I think EA are moneygrabbers but they are damn good at what they are doing. They are the world leaders in graphics simulation. Really no other company can produce the same quality in motion graphics.