What do you think?

After reading info from these two sites I don't know anymore I used to think most of his stuff was true, but now. Ehh.

http://www.hardylaw.net/Truth_About_Bowling.html
http://larryelder.com/michael.html

Look at the sites before posting!

On this link; http://larryelder.com/michael.html you have him called a racist liar. While on the same page, he is called a stupid white man. Yes he is white, but if he was black, and I said stupid black man, I would be considered racist. Hypocrites.

I'm not going to debate this seeing as I know nothing about him. I'll let Zul-Aid make up for my absence. :)

The articles are one-sided. If the stuff were lies, why don't they report on the stuff that was true.

bugger off I am reading all that, I'll take your word :mrpimp:

Whose? (Interested....:confused: )

what is it with people posting the same **** twice - first perles does the same two articles "talk about ficitious" thread and now this one.

I read the first part of the first article: about how it was illegal not to hold the annual NRA metting in Denver 10 days after columbine; so what NRA still has the ultimate authority to stop it, this illegal excuse is exactly what it is: an excuse, Moore is a comedian which makes him an entertainer: I bet everyone who voted for Columbine would have been aware of the facts

Have we (the coalition population) if you or anyone like to call ourselves been aware of the true facts of this war?

Is anyone aware of the true facts of the other documentaries that were nominated for that Oscar? I know one was about a re-uniting of a vietnamese family after their war....

What surprising is FOX news or any other news angencies have not picked up on these, Michael Moores worse enermy and the ones who could do more damage.... Yet have not reported on it or done nothing about it because they know they report it, Michael moore would see it and rebute it for what its worth

Who is David T. Hardy or the other bloke? what have they done? where is there oscar? where is there world popularity? there heroism?

I rest my case

http://www.lisarein.com/michaelmoore/michaelmoorecompare.html
http://asyo.com/michaelmooresspeech/
http://onlisareinsradar.com/

Michael Moore is a genius.

No point in stating the obvious ;)

Yes there is ;)

He is a very excellent entertainer to put it mildly with his political wit however there are some good points sslazio121087 made, however Michael Moore proods himself on referencing and making sure his information is correct - he has put his gaurd down and let entertainment get in the way of facts - but he isnt a bad guy for fight the good fight

I'd like to see him run for the US presidential elections. (Y)

1) He has no political experience
2) America voting left? :rolleyes: We're not gonna get any president that's more liberal than Clinton for a while now. People don't care about government corruption and the economy, they care about homeland security (can you blame 'em? :rolleyes: )

Originally posted by Vagegast
1) He has no political experience


Well besides campaigning for Ralph Nader and being involved in previous elections before that + most of his stuff (bulk of it) is covering political issues - just check his website.

Political experience he has.

I mean, he never had a political position (lawmaker). Not sure about it. Can you find his resume?

i can't say I can.......