|
View Full Version : Which sig is better? X-Ter 28-09-2003, 03:44:AM In the past week i have made two sigs and i wanted everyones opinion on them, so; 1st: http://www.soccergaming.tv/attachment.php?s=&postid=821791 or: Voltaic Borusse 28-09-2003, 03:49:AM I like the second one. You should add the RVN picture into the second banner, and get rid of the faded ManU emblem in the second one, replace it with the RVN picture. I like the font as well. ;) Chelives 28-09-2003, 03:53:AM 1st one without a doubt! Although IMO the border makes it worse , maybe lose the border?? But thats just my opinion! X-Ter 28-09-2003, 03:53:AM But wouldnt the RVN pic not be seen because of the large X-Ter font :confused: ? Anyway here is a border with the second one Voltaic Borusse 28-09-2003, 03:54:AM Originally posted by X-Ter But wouldnt the RVN pic not be seen because of the large X-Ter font :confused: ? Anyway here is a border with the second one It's nicer with the boarder. And resize the font so it won't take up all of the banner space. vincenzo 28-09-2003, 04:54:AM u shud either put the border on the whole thing.. or take it out completely taking it out for the logos really takes away from it.. also the man UTD badge on the left of the second looks pretty bad.. try putting a player there or sumthing else instead... :D ::shinji:: 28-09-2003, 04:56:AM ughh...you have to ask??? the first one is better, the second one makes me wanna --> :-puke: X-Ter 28-09-2003, 05:29:AM New sig IceBlu 28-09-2003, 05:32:AM just use the first one. the other 2 blow :kader: Seb 28-09-2003, 03:44:PM i like the one with only the manu crests in the backround, i h8 the other one simply becoz it has F@G NISTELROOY lol u wanna good forward on it , hENRYS the 1!!!! Legolas 28-09-2003, 04:59:PM use the first one Budge 28-09-2003, 07:08:PM first one but it still needs some work, the border doesnt need to be 3 pixels thick...simple one pixel is best Stotty 29-09-2003, 01:57:AM the lens flare looks outta place in the 1st one |