Personally I was very disappointed with FIFA 2000. I think the gameplay isn't as good as FIFA 99. The opponents are too easy on world class level. I was extremely disappointed with the overall presentation of the game. There is no reason why EA couldn't have kept the opening match sequences and given us a choice of stadiums. I also thought the player graphics were a bit of insult considering the opulence of Fifa 99's players. I have a Pentium 3 with a TNT2 graphics card so I'm not running a crappy system here but as far as I am concerned the players looked half finished with the given impression that the artists half-heartedly designed the general look of them. I really feel that I bought a demo/beta version of the game before all the frills were added.

However, I liked the crowd animations, althougth it wouldn't have killed EA to put the crowd in the colours of the two teams playing. The goalkeepers have also improved and I think they are more "realisitic".

One other thing really pisses me off though. Considering there are a lot of nationalities who reside in the US, why the hell can't I buy the UK version of FIFA 2000 from EA instead of having to order it from a website based in England and then send back MLS to EA for a full refund. No offence intended her to any Americans but I can't stand those American commentators and a footie game just isn't the same without Motty.

London,
U NAILED it right on the head mate..Welcome to the hell that is FIFA2K...All the foremention reasons were enough for me to return the game, but not before copying it...However, I CAN'T stand the game even though now I have it for free...THE COMMENTARY is unbarable, NO AMERICANS should be annoucing a footy game, yes a REAL FOOTBALL GAME, you listening Americans????? Nice going U.S.A, you F%$KED FIFA for good...