"Good games always provide tons of
variety and remain appealing for quite
some time. In FIFA 2000, you get
up-to-date rosters from 15 of the world’s
top leagues, not to mention 40 more
classic teams -- a first for the franchise"

It is from IGN -PSX Review -
Two Points:
1 - UP-TO-DATE ROSTERS?!?!?!?!?!
How could you beleive the review after that?
You start to image if the guy really played the game...

2 - "40 more
classic teams -- a first for the franchise"
The guy didn´t play other games from Fifa, or he forgot about WC98 classic matches?


It is really annoying when someone post:
"The Commentary sucks, but the crowd sound is great!" Rating: 92...

All the reviews look like the same:
Positive - Great Graphics, Great crowd, Great AI (?!?!?!?), Many Teams
Negative - Stupid Rosters, Less special moves, Commentary, Speed...
And at the last line they gave it a 95!
(I could not beleive in a review, where the guy didn´t talk about the referee problem. If you play the game you know the problem...)

Congratulations for PC GamePro, to only review I saw that have the courage to count the negative at the final rating.

In response to the Classic teams in WC 98

They weren't classic teams...what they were,was classic finals.And only that.
No clubs...and no options to organise friendlies.Just set finals.
But as for the rest....yup quite right

I've only got Wc 98 anyway.So i'll buy F2K either way.

See also the topic "Crappy Reviews"