Ratings(Out of 10)
Game's speed:7
Gameplay:8
Realistic scores:8
Graphics:8

Commentary:This is a big improvement compared to Fifa2000 .You can choose the game's speed from slow to fast ,something that i've asked EA to do in a long time .The scores are more realistic than in fifa 2000,in a 8 minute match that i've played ,i won 2-1 ,in fifa 2000 ,in a 8 minute match ,i would of won 7-0 ,so its a big improvement .The only thing this game needed to be an excellent game would have been a larger pitch,but overall ,this game is a good game and its a good sign .Fifa 2001 hopefully will have a larger pitch.

Games speed.....9....more realistic on slow.
Gameplay........8.5..They have tightened up the tackles and marking to certain extent..
Scores..........8.5..
Graphics........9..on D3d at 1024 x 780...3dfx is once again not up to par....
But its a game that is well worth buying, off course people will always complain about certain features, but that will apply to most games anyway..overall the game has got a good solid feel to it and its certainly enjoyable to play...it's not a perfect football game by any standards, but an improvement on some of the previous football games.

Gameplay 6,5
CPU AI 7
Speed 7,5
Grafix 8
Overall 7

as a comparison I'd rate FIFA 2000 this way:
Gameplay 4
CPU AI 6
Speed 5
Grafix 6,5
Overall 5

The game stinks to the sky ! Gameplay is a little bit better as in previous releases but graphics are disaster, players looks are ugly, AI is still not very realistic and the goalie is not looking very real, he is behaving like a robot ! The game has a lot of mistakes, worst EA product until now !

I think that's B*LLSH*T,the game looks great.The faces are diferent,but better,at least they don't look like gorilla's anymore.
The score is very realistic,because the defence is much better than previous EA games.The only thing I think is crap,is that all the stadiums look fantastic,but the best stadium:Feyenoord stadium "De Kuip"(Final Stadium)doesn't look like De Kuip at all.

Dan Cero only if you the warez version it looks crappy.

I got it from Warez and the game's graphics are great a lot better then fifa2000. I strongly disagree with your opionion on Euro2000 graphics .

One thing that definitely ruins the game is the kits. They are all fake, and kills the realism.
Why the **** did EA (or their developers) decide on fake kits for???

Anyway, as soon as it's out, I will make the real kits!

Who cares if the kits are real or not ,its the gameplay that counts.

What do you mean the kits are fake? As long as the colors are right whats the difference, I mean I assume Italy wears blue, Sweden wears yellow, etc.

Is it out already ???

Tckling.... CPU will tackle from behind and No FOUL is given most of the time. Overall the is game is improved. I like it. Tackling still drives me crayz. why this is so hard to understand for EA sports. Get the damn rules right for ones

Yeah PolishPower - fair point...
But I dunno why Northern Ireland's home kit is purple and green (when it's green with white) and Belarus kit looking like the one they wore about 5 years ago...
And as for the Welsh kit - what were EA thinking? The home and away kits clash, and look nothing similar to the real kits.

But one thing I've noticed - the kits look a lot better than those in FIFA 2000 - higher resolution (128x128) and not rough either...

Even the clouds are moving in the sky.
Cool when running at resolution 1600X1200.
Tackles and bulging are more realistic.
Players are more detail.
I like the squads of 27 players in each team.
Improvement oevr Fifa2000.
Now is my wish for Fifa2000,
Please includes linesmen like in the Uefa
Champions' League.
More cards for rough plays and injuries,
goal keepers as well.
Larger pitch size.
More animations.
With these, Fifa2001 will be unbeatable!

hows the commetary team???
do more players get announced now??