So what do you prefer?

TROD.

Stilton cheese! (H)
id settle for cheddar (Y)

I vote for the good 'ol 1-20, but I wouldn't mind 0-100 in the same game, it would work.

1-20's good, but 1-100 will be much more precise, so it'll let you find much more players with stats that you want

one vote people. lol

TROD.

me... im a old fashioned 1 to 20 kinda guy
dont fix it if it aint broken

1-100... u can get much more player quality variations from it.... for example, beckhams crossing. can be 95 and someone like john beswetherick can hav 25..... world class and second division quality at a glance........

i voted for the good ol' 1-20, but i wouldnt be fussed about 1-100 either

1-20 is the way, plain and simple.

hmm u really should just have the option to change between them

1-20 is fine

i wouldn't mind 1-50 or 1-100 tho

I'd take 1-100, but 1-20 is fine as well.

its better if they give usthe option to change it to as we want, like the currency with which u pay your players

1-100 is impossible. A scout can not ever say that one player, who has great passing, deserves 85 points, when another, who also has great passing, should get 84. :S

It's too much. It won't interfere with gameplay, but it's over-accurate.

completly agree ruud, theres too much incosnsitency

TROD.

1-20

1-00 would make the game more complex and more problems could arise

I still feel that 1-100 is better. It just gives people a better idea of the player there buying.

i know aiden picked cheese, but who were the other two?

TROD.

Originally posted by TROD
i know aiden picked cheese, but who were the other two?

TROD.

Don't you mean four? :p

1-20 :)