Search results

Yeah and we all know who won the tie...

why are chelsea releasing a kit when they've only had the current one for a year?

good lord.

its pretty obvious the kit is photoshop... i mean you didn't think that was a pic of the actual kit did you?

New England kit is a winner

its just... white. like someone said, it looks like the test cricket top the ECB wear. but then again, you can't go wrong with white, its good for me. looks like a lacoste polo, pretty casual

Etihad as far as I'm aware is owned by the same company in Abu Dhabi that own Manchester City so it seems logical.

That's bull****, we haven't killed anyone.

I bought the wrong away kit, yay for me.

The numbers look slick.

Real Madrid offer United, 30 legs of ham for Ronaldo, which is promptly rejected. Ferguson: "Ham, that's absolute bollocks that, ridiculous price for the boy, we wan't some prime steak"

98% of kits since the late 70s are made of 100% polyester

Its like when Argentina wore a brand new adidas shirt in 2001 the year before the World Cup.

I talk like ze dutch now ja.

Good to see adidas recycling all the unsold Chelsea away kits from last season. adidas - Fighting climate change is not impossible. Impossible is nothing.

Certainly unique, I like it

Every star represented a championship though, I thought that was a bit special.

I agree, the new logo is so plain and poor, the old one was almost a growing tapestry showing the club's history and success. Looks like they have the Nike kits with the mesh at the back, replicas of the European kits don't have it, it makes the fan tops rather cheap.

Upskirt far right hahaha

Hits the post every time.