What are you talkig about? You say you ddn't say Chelsea was liable and now you do. You argue one thing, then abandon it and go back after two posts (also still haven't addressed my Kev Hart questions). If Fiore transfered the money and started making plans without tying Salah down, that is their fault. Chelsea have nothing to do with it. You are yet to explain what Chelsea did wrong. Yku're just vaguely repeating the same stupid, meaningless point over and over.Xifio;3835322 said:oh, no, buddy, this is Mandieta6 in da house -- creating conflict where there is absolutely no need for it ...
Fiorentina have planned their financial and human resource decisions for the coming season with Salah included ... so it's not a simple situation when a contractor suddenly changes his demands ... Chelsea giving the money back isn't going to fix that ...
the suit would be against the contractor; it's an ugly route to go down ...
If Fiore have an issue wit Salah they can take it uo with him, not make demands to Chelsea (I'd love to see your explanation fir why Chelsea need to pay them extra for driving up Salah's value). That said, the clause was there in the contract they signed. Everything after that is mostly down to their stupidity.
And no, whatever I post does not change the fwct that you're the overpriced version of Xaviesta. Like 5 dollar water from Norway.