Ahh Yes. Tevez Is Going To Man Utd!!!!

[tracertong]

Oh man, don't let Pete hear you say that.

ooooooooo scared. :chick:

 

[untouchable]

Haha ohhhhhhhhhhhh yeaaah

 

[Kulixs]

The stupidity of some people amaze me. We all know what a crock of s.h.it this story is BUT the Mancs have swallowed it whole. Get real FFS.

and I'm amazed that Man U fans have just filled up 3 pages of their thread, wanking over the idea of Tevez's arrival.

Soooooooooooo...........can we get an apology up in here Pede

 

[pede54]

ooooooooo scared. :chick:

Tracer....behave yourself:mexican:

I am amazed if this latest speculation is true. My opinion was purely based on the fact that at the very recent appeal regarding Sheffield United V West Ham, the hammers owner Mr Egghead read a statement that emphasised that Tevez's registration was owned by West Ham and that Tevez had a 3 year contract with the club.

IF todays news is true, and the supposed deal for Tevez from Man U is a 2 year loan, then obviously West ham neither own his registration or have Tevez tied to a contract. If they had possession of either of these then they would not simply "loan" out their star player to a Premiership rival. They would either be selling him to Man U or they would be keeping him at West Ham.

It is now obvious to everybody that West Ham were lying all along about the Tevez situation. Not just the previous administration at Upton Park but more importantly, the present administration.

By allowing themselves to be used this way concerning Tevez going to Man U, West Ham have proved to us all that the charges that Sheffield United levelled at West Ham seem to be true. West Ham managed to keep a lid on those lies until today. This deal, has found them out BIG TIME.

I did not think in a million years that West Ham could be so stupid. I am amazed at them really. They have virtually relegated themselves to the Championship because the Premier League will now charge them with deception and they will swap places with Sheffield United. They deserve everything that's coming IMO.

My mistake, along with millions of others was to believe that West Ham, after defending themselves twice in court, were telling the truth. They were lying and I based my opinion on their deception.

Apart from all that, my rant was not about Tevez going to man U. My rant was to point out that it is stupid and gullible to believe anything on face value that the media put out. Mikey and Slowsilver advised caution in case the story was bull, and thats how it's gotta be. OK this time the story MIGHT be true but the principle remains I believe.

OH yeah, Somebody who claims to be a Man U fan thought he would use the little kids game that SG kindly supply for all the braindead on here,i.e. the NEG/POS Rep crap.

I just had to share it with you all......

omfg's we been travelling to OLD STAFFORD for 2 years now think we know more than you

Old Stafford???? Where the fu<k is that you lifelong gloryhunting fool. :funny:

 

[pede54]

Soooooooooooo...........can we get an apology up in here Pede

If it turns out to be true.........Sorry lads

If it's crap.......I told ya so:mexican:

 

[SlowSilver]

I just had to share it with you all......


Old Stafford???? Where the fu<k is that you lifelong gloryhunting fool. :funny:

Brilliant

 

[pede54]

Brilliant

I went to my control panel and there as usual were the latest rep comments. I usually ignore this childish crap entirely but this one just jumped out and tickled me. I nearly pissed myself laughing.:funny:

 

[Keegan]

Well... my conspiracy theory just blooms and grows... why on earth would West Ham 'loan' the brilliant player that single-handedly kept them in the Prem, to the strongest team in the league that, by some strange coincidence, they managed to defeat in the last game of the season to stay in the Prem - and with goals by the same brilliant player at that?

If that deal is viewed as anything other than the culmination of an arrangement that kept West Ham in the Prem, somebody needs glasses - and I already have mine, thank you very much.

 

[Razza2k7]

yeh i dont think nani and anderson are sure starters just yet.

tevez and rooney up front, with 2 out of carrick scholes and hargreaves playing in the middle. sounds pretty good.

Nani and Andersen are replacements for Giggs and Scholes so Giggs and scholes are subed. Hargreaves will take carrick's place.

 

[Help?]

Well... my conspiracy theory just blooms and grows... why on earth would West Ham 'loan' the brilliant player that single-handedly kept them in the Prem, to the strongest team in the league that, by some strange coincidence, they managed to defeat in the last game of the season to stay in the Prem - and with goals by the same brilliant player at that?

If that deal is viewed as anything other than the culmination of an arrangement that kept West Ham in the Prem, somebody needs glasses - and I already have mine, thank you very much.

West Ham is still in the prem only due to total luck, not some staged event. The fact that Tevez scored the last goal is because he was the only real threat from West Ham in the last 2 month of the season. But nice try there

 

[Razza2k7]

I have seen this aswell might look usefull to you "Carlos Tevez's &#163;25million move to Manchester United is under severe scrutiny by the Premier League. United have taken their summer spending past the &#163;75m-mark by agreeing a deal for 23-year-old Tevez with his owner, businessman Kia Joorabchian.

Last night Tevez said: "For me, Manchester United will be a sensational destination and to be a member of Sir Alex Ferguson's squad will be absolutely spectacular."

 

[Keegan]

West Ham is still in the prem only due to total luck, not some staged event. The fact that Tevez scored the last goal is because he was the only real threat from West Ham in the last 2 month of the season. But nice try there

As Paul McCartney said:

You keep dreaming - I don't believe it!

from "The Girl Is Mine"

I notice you didn't try to touch my other point - why the loan?

 

[Kulixs]

I agree fully with Pede on this one, after coming home from work and reading about Man Utd agreeing terms with Tevez, while West Ham are denying they've had contact from Man Utd, it leads to only one conclusion. West Ham have broken premiership rules big time, the third party ownership is so blatant in this case its beyond a joke. I had previously thought third party ownership wasn't that bad, but after looking at all the confusion and bother this is causing, the Premier League need to hand out the highest punishment to team's like West Ham. I don't have the slightest clue who own's Tevez, or how you would ever go about buying him.

Imagine something like this happening in Football Manager, I wouldn't play it

 

[Thelonious]

I think Fifa should step in and ban third party contracts, have a 6 month period in which the third party owners can sell their contracts and the problem will be solved. It stops messy transfers like this, and would any player trafficking the could occur. It could get to point where masses of young African or South American kids are signed up by businessmen and forced to move to Europe and are pretty much under the control of their owner with regards to who they sign for, when they play, how much they earn. I think it has potential to be incredibly damaging for the game.
With the Tevez situation it will be decided by Lawyers, any deal with MSI will be useless as a far as the Premier League is concerned Tevez is fully owned by West Ham.

 

[Help?]

As Paul McCartney said:


from "The Girl Is Mine"

I notice you didn't try to touch my other point - why the loan?

Hmm let's see:

Man Utd - West Ham Utd
Goal Attempts
28 - 6
On Target
20 - 4
Off Target
8 - 2
Corners
14 - 3


So imma quote Scissor Sisters
"Better luck next time"




Why the loan? Cause its too risky to buy him right now? I don't know, does it matter? Its probably because of all the problems with MSI, why else? But to think that the game with West Ham was staged and that it was predetermined that Tevez will be the one to score the winner, you gotta either really have no life or be crazy to believe that. How about you go watch the game first, because staging that kind of game would definietly deserve an award. That must be some nice practiced saves from Green and Benayoun.



Next time, please do look at the facts before pointing out something stupid, thanks.

 

[Keegan]

Where did I suggest that

...it was predetermined that Tevez will be the one to score the winner

? Read my comments before you talk out of your a**. All I am saying is that it seems really dumb to 'loan' your best player to the strongest team in the league. If that makes perfect sense to you, then more power to you. You obviously wouldn't know stupid if you fell face-down in it.

 

[Help?]

Where did I suggest that ?

by some strange coincidence, they managed to defeat in the last game of the season to stay in the Prem - and with goals by the same brilliant player at that?

Oh, will ya look at that, I wonder where it came from?

Read my comments before you talk out of your a**. All I am saying is that it seems really dumb to 'loan' your best player to the strongest team in the league. If that makes perfect sense to you, then more power to you. You obviously wouldn't know stupid if you fell face-down in it.

If that deal is viewed as anything other than the culmination of an arrangement that kept West Ham in the Prem, somebody needs glasses - and I already have mine, thank you very much.

Or is it? To me it looks like you clearly claimed that Manchester vs West Ham game was fixed

I notice you didn't try to touch my other point - why the loan?

You said it yourself, that you had more than one thing to say.



I don't care why loan Tevez instead of sell, i don't have a problem with you claiming anything about the loan, but i do have a problem with the match fixing claim. As i said, if anyone thinks that game was staged, they must be retarded, my point stands. End of discussion.

 

[pede54]

Taking Tevez on loan is the only "safe" way that Man U can aquire him. Obviously he is still owned by his agent and not West Ham because it is his agent who has been hawking Tevez to any potential takers and West Ham obviously have no say in where Tevez goes. Proof indeed that West Ham have no say whatsoever in the life of Tevez.

Man U are legally in the clear of course, (if not morally), as long as any money handed over goes directly to West Ham and NOT Tevez's agent. Although thats easy to get around if needed.

I think its obvious also that this deal could never have been done without Man U talking to Joorabchain, and that in itself is a little immoral to say the least considering the baggage and the complications that we all know surrounds Tevez. West Ham are insisting that they have NOT spoken to Man U at all over this, which suggests, if true, that Man U have been sneaky and gone to Joorabchain behind West Ham's back. That is just not an acceptable way to do things.

It's a messy business indeed and the Premier League, the FA, UEFA and FIFA, need to stop this questionable behaviour regarding 3rd party ownership before football in England is soiled forever by these wheeler dealers.

Unfortunately the sport is already corrupt from Blatter downwards and as long as certain palms are being greased, nothing will ever change.

West Hams statement this morning
http://www.sportinglife.com/footbal...STORY_NAME=soccer/07/07/06/manual_233018.html

This is gonna be messy indeed.

 

[Kulixs]

I can imagine this dragging on forever.

 

[Keegan]

Chappie, you assume too much, and you protest too much. Cheers.