This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:
1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.
2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.
3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.
Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.
Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.
Thank you!
Mus;2609098 said:One word, Warner.
Haarithan;3174531 said:Exactly. This Australian side aren't even remotely good (take a look at your top 3!), it's India who've made them look like 'world beaters'. Heck they couldn't even manage a home series victory against NZL off all teams!
I thoroughly expect England to rip Australia into shreds in the upcoming Ashes series in 2013.
Well other than football you are generally considered better than us at those sports, so if you dont beat us I wouldnt say you lifted your game. You sound very, very bitter about the previous two ashes series, and I have to admit that makes me happyAlex;3174867 said:Australia stuffed up one innings against New Zealand and it cost them.
We just came off a drawn series against South Africa, in South Africa. Then thrashed a full strength India 4-0. That's the number 2 and 3 sides. Also against NZ we were experimenting quite a bit. It was a small blip on the radar, but since the restructure of Cricket Australia, things are definitely looking up. The bowlers have improved out of site, and batsman refound form, not to mention Warner coming into the side and Watson still to return.
Sir_Didier_Drogba, football world cups don't count, we've never played you. In 2003, you were a better Rugby side, we lifted just to get so close. In 07 we without star player and fly half, sooooo again you were just a better side. Lifting doesn't mean beating, it means playing better than you usually do.
Last Ashes in Australia we were terrible, you were good. We were a team rebuilding and deserved to lose. Series before that rain saved you in the first test and you won the series by one test. Then before that we beat you 5-0, and I still insist the DRS being around the series before that would have meant we won the series. Kasprowicz's hand wasn't on the bat when he was caught behind off the glove and you won by two runs in the second test. That changed the outcome odd not just the match, but the series.
Anyway, aside from all of this, over those four series, we've still won more matches. And what about the weight series' before that?
I'm glad I only started watching cricket about half way through those years, dont think I could have stood double the amount of time of Aussie dominance. But yeah, I used the phrase cricketing dynasty in my last post, and that is the ultimate example. That was perhaps the greatest cricketing dynasty of all. Up there with AC Milan in the 90s!Alex;3174913 said:PS. Yeah, I'm very disappointed in our sporting record in the past ten years full stop. We were up there in nearly all the sports we played in the 90s. Our Cricket side was ridiculously good. Really I'm just glad I was around to see what was possibly one of the best sporting teams in any sport, in any era. Cricinfo did a stats analysis and it has them as best cricket side ever-ahead of the Windies of the 80s and Bradman's Aussies (Greg Chappell's Aussies were fourth, but no, it wasn't an Aussie author). That era is over, but at least I was here to enjoy ever minute. Gilchrist, McGrath, Ponting, Waugh, Hayden, Gillespie all in the one side, not to mention guys like Lee, Martyn, MacGill, Langer, Hussey, who could have been greats in another era.