-
This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:
1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.
2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.
3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.
Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.
Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.
Thank you!
- Status
thetrooper37
Senior Squad
MikeyM;2741251 said:
hahah that's pretty old. Still a good read though.
As far as the Sun interview, I kinda think it's fake. I'm pretty sure Berbatov doesn't say "man".
WTFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
Phace = 0 & Energy = 0 & Passing =0 & Scholes = $hit & Welback=-100000 => Sunderland 1 - United 0
why no Valencia, why no Giggs on the bench and why not Macheda?
we will be lucky if we get a point if we play like the first half (Burnley Dejavu).
I precict 3-1 for United.
Phace = 0 & Energy = 0 & Passing =0 & Scholes = $hit & Welback=-100000 => Sunderland 1 - United 0
why no Valencia, why no Giggs on the bench and why not Macheda?
we will be lucky if we get a point if we play like the first half (Burnley Dejavu).
I precict 3-1 for United.
Jaboldinho
Fan Favourite
So, how about that Berbatov kid?
Pogba4Now
Team Captain
Final score 2-2. We should've won this one. I think we played well in the second half but our finishing was poor. That Berbatov goal was a pure class. And Foster should've dealt better with Sunderland's second goal. He was very shaky throughout the whole game. I hope the Chelsea Vs Liverpool game ends as a draw. So that both can drop points.
We were so lucky to come up with one point at the end and to be honest, we didn't deserve it at all.
well, I don't know why Fergie underestimates opponents sometimes. No Rio, using Scholes again, whyyyyyyyyyyyyyy wellback, whyyyyyyyyyyyy?, and no giggs on the bench, three defenders there and no striker.
He said after Burnley game that he should have used Valencia and he did that mistake again.
well, I don't know why Fergie underestimates opponents sometimes. No Rio, using Scholes again, whyyyyyyyyyyyyyy wellback, whyyyyyyyyyyyy?, and no giggs on the bench, three defenders there and no striker.
He said after Burnley game that he should have used Valencia and he did that mistake again.
cattermole is always up for the united matches, and he will run all day. i dont know why fergie feels the need to play a weak midfield against him all the time, he burnt us a couple of times when he played for middlesboro too. that was SAF's fault today, he played a midfield that was too weak to compete in most EPL games.
scholes isnt looking good, nani is too far advanced up the field to chip in with openeing up channels to pass, welbeck isnt a winger and fletcher didnt have a great game powerful players can still knock his skinny ass around the place if they wanna.
weak MF = no service for rooney = angry rooney.
at least we improved once ando came on. we got lucky today, that is for sure. sund looked like a wel oil organized team capable of playing anyone in europe today.
scholes isnt looking good, nani is too far advanced up the field to chip in with openeing up channels to pass, welbeck isnt a winger and fletcher didnt have a great game powerful players can still knock his skinny ass around the place if they wanna.
weak MF = no service for rooney = angry rooney.
at least we improved once ando came on. we got lucky today, that is for sure. sund looked like a wel oil organized team capable of playing anyone in europe today.
4ndr3i;2741637 said:
As nady pointed out it was just humour, quoted from a thread on another forum we were were all talking about and how it had me laughing. You should take a look at this thread at how pro ronaldo I am. anyway....What was wrong with the team today, very odd. I think rockshow has nailed it on the head though. Anderson again looked very good though. Really starting to like that boy, fingers crossed for him. Things will hopefully start converting for him.
AidanNelson2009
Club Supporter
Manchester United 2-2 Sunderland ( Match review )
Ratings:
Man Utd-
Foster: 5/10 - Was shocking, needs to go, get Kuszack on, Foster isn't upto it.
O'Shea: 6/10 - Didn't do much at all, too slow and poor crosses.
Vidic: 6/10 - Tried, but Jones was to big and good for him, had trouble with Bent and Jones.
Evra: 7/10 - Probably our best player for the game, defended well and attacked with great pace, got the vital equaliser.
Nani: 4/10 - Don't know what to say anymore, so dissapointed, his last year for sure.
Scholes: 5/10 - Didn't control the ball, poor passing, a very average game.
Fletcher: 4/10 - Same as Scholes, poor passing, never controlled the midfield, too many mistakes.
Welbeck: 5/10 - Tired his best, couldn't do too much with the way the whole team was playing.
Berbatov: 7/10 - Great goal to make it 1-1, but had a poor game apart from that goal, gave the ball away far too often and slows the game down all the time.
Rooney: 3/10 - An absolute disgrace, worst game i have ever seen him play, something is wrong, is in really bad form.
Ratings:
Man Utd-
Foster: 5/10 - Was shocking, needs to go, get Kuszack on, Foster isn't upto it.
O'Shea: 6/10 - Didn't do much at all, too slow and poor crosses.
Vidic: 6/10 - Tried, but Jones was to big and good for him, had trouble with Bent and Jones.
Evra: 7/10 - Probably our best player for the game, defended well and attacked with great pace, got the vital equaliser.
Nani: 4/10 - Don't know what to say anymore, so dissapointed, his last year for sure.
Scholes: 5/10 - Didn't control the ball, poor passing, a very average game.
Fletcher: 4/10 - Same as Scholes, poor passing, never controlled the midfield, too many mistakes.
Welbeck: 5/10 - Tired his best, couldn't do too much with the way the whole team was playing.
Berbatov: 7/10 - Great goal to make it 1-1, but had a poor game apart from that goal, gave the ball away far too often and slows the game down all the time.
Rooney: 3/10 - An absolute disgrace, worst game i have ever seen him play, something is wrong, is in really bad form.
- Status