New Road to World Cup screens and info (X05)

[deftonesmx17]

And? So what?

It only shows that PS3 can run it too and most likely it does so without breakin a single sweat.

The Unreal 3 demo that ran on the PS3 dev kit can run with this card too. Does that mean that the card is just as good as the RSX? No.

You owned yourself.

Maybe you should read. For one, I never said a Geforce 7800 was as good as the RSX. What I did say was that the RSX is an overclocked Geforce 7800. Meaning it has the same features.

http://www.bit-tech.net/bits/2005/07/11/nvidia_rsx_interview/2.html
RSX and the PlayStation 3

For those that don't know, if you've been living under a rock for the last few months, the graphics processor in the PlayStation 3 is NVIDIA-designed and is called RSX. How does it compare next to the 7800?

"The two products share the same heritage, the same technology. But RSX is faster," said Kirk.

Once again for the $ony nut suckers, the RSX is nothing more than an overclocked Geforce 7800.

Then we can move along, the PS3's RSX doesnt even support SM 3.0, but uses Nvidias failed cg tech. http://www.theinq.com/?article=25950 That makes the Luna demo even more odd. For those of you that don't know. SM 3.0 is DirectX shading language. The PS3 does not use directx, thus why the RSXS doesnt do SM 3.0, but uses Nvidias cg tech. Since the Luna demo uses directx and SM 3.0, do you see the problem yet.

If anything you just owned yourself buddy. You say the RSX didnt break a sweat with the Luna demo, well i doubt the 7800 breaks a sweat either. Here is an example. When I owned a Radeon 9500 Pro, it could still run every Radeon 9700 Pro AND 9800 Pro tech demo with ease. Why? Because it had all the features of the higher two chipsets, it was just slower. So your point is very mute in that respect.

 

[Frostwolf]

you mean Japan and Korea stadiums? 10?

20, smartass.