cus said:
actually I don't understand..
do you mean to say "you should have not resisted all the invasions and insurgencies" ???..... I know some of you will hate me bringing America into this but, year 2004 and even America couldn't avoid civilian casualties with all these high-tech equipment in a war (just to you know, it's about 300.000 total) ... so why the fcuk do you accuse Turks for not being able to prevent civilian casualties in a war in 1915.....
when I say there was no evidence found by the Court formed by British Army in Turkish Archives, one man, who surely is completely out of his mind, makes a claim like "They should have searched French and American Archives"... just this proves how unreasonable he is... <-------- THAT'S YOU PONTIAKOS
I really feel sick..
Ok so one by one
True turk
apparently you don't know were;
1)The tzarist russians invaded during WWI
2)Were the Armenians, Assyrians, and Pontian Greeks were killed
So here is a map of Karadeniz-Pontos
Many villages were burned if you want I can list them all. The most serious event took place in Harput and Kerasus. Where are these? .......hmmm let me seee......oh wait they're in the map above.
Cus
How it is unreasonable to include more than one source in a trial investigation?
That trial was b*llsh*t it was set up to ease the mind of the West. The only sources used were Turkish....so .....the result was obviously false. Because your Neo-Turks burned all records previous to the war.
As far as who won or lost on "paper" it was Turkey that lost. IN REALITY
1,500,000 Armenians
350,000 Pontian Greeks
260,000 Assyrians
All dead, all due to the systematic and premeditated genocide that Mustafa "Ataturk" Kemal carried out.
In addition Greece, who represented the Allies in this front, was driven out of Anatolia by the Turkish offensive. In other words they lost the war, the allies lost the war. The Treaty that both sides had to sign was not favorable for either side. Based on the out come of the Allies LOSING Smyrna there had to be a compomise.