-
This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:
1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.
2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.
3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.
Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.
Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.
Thank you!
US Presidential Debates 2004
- Thread starter Hakeem
- Start date
Originally posted by rhizome17
Haha - thats right, Elders great 'libertarian' principle of legislating on people's thoughts and beliefs
Haha. No wonder you are voting for Bush this election.
Maybe you forget that its' the left that likes to legislate what people can and cannot think...
Three words: "Hate Crime Laws"
Brondbyfan
Senior Squad
V
Virgo
Guest
that is a total contradiction with the politics of the people you defend in this forum dailly.
Oh yeah, I forgot to add that the US is now going to have to go to war with itself. Since one of the justifications for the war in Iraq was that nuclear marterials might get into the hands of 'terrorists', and this has actually now happened only once Iraq was under US control, it makes sense you know.
I reckon divide the troops between those north of Baghdad and those South.
I reckon divide the troops between those north of Baghdad and those South.
Brondbyfan
Senior Squad
Wait wait, are you saying one of the justifications for Bush invading Iraq was hypocritical BS?
I refuse to believe that.
I refuse to believe that.
Originally posted by Brondbyfan
Wait wait, are you saying one of the justifications for Bush invading Iraq was hypocritical BS?
I refuse to believe that.
You guys are silly... you are saying that one of the arugments for war was that nuclear materials might get into the hands of terrorists... but over and over you state that the reasons for going to war were all lies... yet now we find out that nuclear materials WERE in Iraq. But ALL of the justifications for war were lies...
So what gives?
silly boys...
Originally posted by Elder
Oh, but you fall into the trap of arguing there never was any nuclear materials or WMD... so how did they disapear if they were never there?!?!?! Seems one of your arguments falls flat on it's face...
Haha you show your ignorance again. There never were any nuclear materials, only things available in every country on the planet that has any form of industry, but can be used if a nuclear programme was to be started at some point. These same things can be found everywhere, and their use is not restricted to nuclear programmes. Industrial equipment that can be found in your home town no doubt.
The whole point is that these 'sites of interest' were not even considered by your glorious country to be worth safeguarding (hence: NO nuclear materials) in the event someone decided to dismantle them and remove the equipment.
Fact remains, there is still no justification for the war that remains intact.
You're dreaming. Bush had Kerry in the crosshairs tonight and pulled the trigger. He even had Kerry praising Bush more than a couple of times at the end.
The only thing I saw Bush look silly on was the minumun wage question where he completely ignored it and started talking about "No Child Left Behind"... just answer the question.
USA Supporter
Reserve Team
Bush didn't answer the question because he knew that people wouldn't like the answer. Bush seemed to avoid a lot of questions tonight.
