Chelsea will cain the hell out of Barca!

[kaycee2g]

1.) If i were stupid, i would know! I can assure you that I am not stupid

2.) Scott Parker is not half as talented as Mikel Obi, and Jose mourinho thinks so! Its like comparing Messi to Steward Downing or Jermaine Pennant! one is outrageuosly talented and the other two are quite overhyped.

- Trust me, When the best coach in the world picks u and refers to you as gold, while discarding of others [like Parker and duff], I am afrai, but you really must be special..

3.) its in ur best interest to rea my post carefully, I am not replacing chelsea players, I just said - in relation to someones request - what players I would choose, if i ha the roster of both clubs at my disposal

4.)Mancienne is a top top talent, and I look forward to his progress!

 

[d3adly]

kaycee i asked overall you whose midfield do you think is better and u still haven't answered my question.

p.s i mean current squads and no swapping players.

 

[kaycee2g]

Chelsea's mifield is better, an thats why they won the midfield Battle in both games.

 

[Callum]

Middlesborough 2
Chelsea 1

Discuss Kaycee.

 

[Bonzi]

It really must hurt to see chelsea spend 16 -26 million on young Africans while rejecting English players? huh?

Bridge, Johnson, Parker, e.t.c......

England still have got enough players to reach at least quaterfinals of every major tournament, while Nigeria cannot even qualify for the World Cup and their only "superstar" sits on the bench at Chelsea.

 

[kaycee2g]

England still have got enough players to reach at least quaterfinals of every major tournament, while Nigeria cannot even qualify for the World Cup and their only "superstar" sits on the bench at Chelsea.

Mikel, whom you refer to as a superstar, is not a starter for the Nigerian national team. He sits on the bench there too. For chelsea to spend 16 million pounds for a player not even starting for the Nigerian National team must tell a lot on that country.

 

[Bonzi]

Mikel, whom you refer to as a superstar, is not a starter for the Nigerian national team. He sits on the bench there too. For chelsea to spend 16 million pounds for a player not even starting for the Nigerian National team must tell a lot on that country.

Moreover, paying 16 millions for a player, who's not even a starter for a national team, that cannot qualify for the World Cup, is just...

 

[kaycee2g]

One must be shocked though, that even with the apparent uselessness of Nigeria, they are ranked as high as 11th in the FIFA rankings. I am astounded!!!

Moreover, the amount of money pai for the kid clearly shows the trust and belief in his talent. One wishes we could all say the same about scott parker, jenas, Shaun wright-phillips, Downing, Bridge ..e.t.c..

 

[d3adly]

ur saying nigerian talent is better than english talent?

 

[Kibe Kru]

Mikel, whom you refer to as a superstar, is not a starter for the Nigerian national team. He sits on the bench there too. For chelsea to spend 16 million pounds for a player not even starting for the Nigerian National team must tell a lot on that country.

Moreover, the amount of money pai for the kid clearly shows the trust and belief in his talent. One wishes we could all say the same about scott parker, jenas, Shaun wright-phillips, Downing, Bridge ..e.t.c

Chelsea paid 21M for Shaun Wright Phillips, so that automatically means he's better than Mikel, correct? You can't compare the price paid for Mikel with those paid by other clubs, simply because Chelsea overpays. The only comparison you can make is with SWP, and SWP cost more.

As for FIFA rankings, we all know how good it is. Mind you, they had the USA side as 5th just before the World Cup, didn't they?

 

[TOON ARMY]

Moreover, the amount of money pai for the kid clearly shows the trust and belief in his talent. One wishes we could all say the same about scott parker, jenas, Shaun wright-phillips, Downing, Bridge ..e.t.c..

I tried to ignore this thread the best i could but i just need to make a few points here.

How old is Obi Mikel, 19? As much as i dislike Jenas at the age of 19 he was a regular in a Newcastle side finishing regularly in the top 5 of the league with something like 8 goals to his name during one season alone. Hmm, what about Mikel, just the one sending off to his name...

Secondly, Parker is a typical old school English central mid-fielder. He doesn't have great technique but he more than makes up for that in other areas of his game. Surplus to requirements at Chelsea because he happened to have the Worlds greatest holding mid-fielder in front of him thus making his chances of first team football slim. He is now a captain and believe me you don't captain Newcastle United if you are a bad player, the fans wouldn't allow it.

Next, SWP. You said that the amount of money spent on a player shows the manager's belief in his talent. SWP commanded a fee of over £20 million. Surely that shows Mourinho has belief in his talent? Perhaps you have ignored the fact that Mourinho doesn't play with wingers and therefore SWP hasn't had many opportunities at Chelsea. His talent has never been in question.

Downing, well Downing is a product of Boro's youth academy so why bring him into the argument? He has been at one club his whole career so obviously hasn't had a fee spent on him.

As for Bridge ask one proper Chelsea fan which player is the most important to Chelsea's immediate succes, Bridge of Mikel? The second choice left full back or the bit part mid-fielder bottom of the pile who managed to get himself sent off before he even completed his premiership debut. Maybe, Pete can answer that? I know he mainly lingers in the Chelsea thread because you Kaycee hijack every thread about Chelsea giving his club a bad name.

Now why don't you **** off back to your hole and go masturbate over JJ Okocha and the rest of your countries mediocre footballing talent.

 

[d3adly]

Now why don't you **** off back to your hole and go masturbate over JJ Okocha and the rest of your countries mediocre footballing talent.

ouch! thats gotta hurt.

 

[Mandieta6]

Now now, Okocha is a great player, but kaycee gives Nigeria a bad name nearly as much as Hitler did to Germany.

Anyways, this guy is obviously dim and has racial issues. How can anyone compare someone who played in the Nigerian league and was great talent, to someone who made his way to the Premier and proved himself? I've no idea about where Mikel played, or why there's so much interest in him. When he proves himself, I'll praise him for it, until then, the fact that someone who thinks of himself as the next best thing to reach football since the invention of goalposts, think he's great really doesn't confort me when thinking that we sold Duff for a third of his price. It just further proves people right when saying that Chelsea are only a good team because of their money. I'd rather have seen that money invested in a new, bigger stadium, or actual proven talents.

I'm not saying Mikel is a bad player, but he's unproven, so for you to compare him to SWP, Downing, Bridge, etc. who don't even play the same position to my knowledge, is stupid. Besides, Bridge is one of the best left fullbacks England has, only reason he doesn't get play time is because A.Cole is on the team, the other grand left full-back England has. And still, Bridge has given Chelsea more than Mikel has.

I can't believe you've actually managed to stir me against a Chelsea player, you're like the Chelsea anti-christ.

P.S

I love Mourinho, but let's face it, he's an idiot.

 

[kaycee2g]

ur saying nigerian talent is better than english talent?

Yes, thats what i am saying. I am gla someone understands my point. Dont also forget that Norther Ireland took Englad to the cleaners! thats says a lot.

 

[kaycee2g]

I tried to ignore this thread the best i could but i just need to make a few points here.

How old is Obi Mikel, 19? As much as i dislike Jenas at the age of 19 he was a regular in a Newcastle side finishing regularly in the top 5 of the league with something like 8 goals to his name during one season alone. Hmm, what about Mikel, just the one sending off to his name...

Secondly, Parker is a typical old school English central mid-fielder. He doesn't have great technique but he more than makes up for that in other areas of his game. Surplus to requirements at Chelsea because he happened to have the Worlds greatest holding mid-fielder in front of him thus making his chances of first team football slim. He is now a captain and believe me you don't captain Newcastle United if you are a bad player, the fans wouldn't allow it.

Next, SWP. You said that the amount of money spent on a player shows the manager's belief in his talent. SWP commanded a fee of over £20 million. Surely that shows Mourinho has belief in his talent? Perhaps you have ignored the fact that Mourinho doesn't play with wingers and therefore SWP hasn't had many opportunities at Chelsea. His talent has never been in question.

Downing, well Downing is a product of Boro's youth academy so why bring him into the argument? He has been at one club his whole career so obviously hasn't had a fee spent on him.

As for Bridge ask one proper Chelsea fan which player is the most important to Chelsea's immediate succes, Bridge of Mikel? The second choice left full back or the bit part mid-fielder bottom of the pile who managed to get himself sent off before he even completed his premiership debut. Maybe, Pete can answer that? I know he mainly lingers in the Chelsea thread because you Kaycee hijack every thread about Chelsea giving his club a bad name.

Now why don't you **** off back to your hole and go masturbate over JJ Okocha and the rest of your countries mediocre footballing talent.

jenas was a regular in a mediocre Newcastle team. U must atleast concede that Jenas -- even at his current age - cannot make the chelsea reserve team. U wil be having a laugh to think otherwise.

 

[kaycee2g]

Now now, Okocha is a great player, but kaycee gives Nigeria a bad name nearly as much as Hitler did to Germany.

Anyways, this guy is obviously dim and has racial issues. How can anyone compare someone who played in the Nigerian league and was great talent, to someone who made his way to the Premier and proved himself? I've no idea about where Mikel played, or why there's so much interest in him. When he proves himself, I'll praise him for it, until then, the fact that someone who thinks of himself as the next best thing to reach football since the invention of goalposts, think he's great really doesn't confort me when thinking that we sold Duff for a third of his price. It just further proves people right when saying that Chelsea are only a good team because of their money. I'd rather have seen that money invested in a new, bigger stadium, or actual proven talents.

I'm not saying Mikel is a bad player, but he's unproven, so for you to compare him to SWP, Downing, Bridge, etc. who don't even play the same position to my knowledge, is stupid. Besides, Bridge is one of the best left fullbacks England has, only reason he doesn't get play time is because A.Cole is on the team, the other grand left full-back England has. And still, Bridge has given Chelsea more than Mikel has.

I can't believe you've actually managed to stir me against a Chelsea player, you're like the Chelsea anti-christ.

P.S

I love Mourinho, but let's face it, he's an idiot.

You may see Mourinho as an idiot, but this is his record 4 years- -

Portuguese title - 2
English title - 2
Charity shield - 1
Portuguese Cup - 1
Portuguese super cup - 1
UEFA Cup - 1
Champions league - 1
Carling Cup - 1

Surely, this idiot must know a thing about football? well he does an he confirms that Parker, Duff, Johnson, Bridge are not goo enough to play for a club like chelsea, while he refers to Mikel as gold!

 

[ShearerM4]

You do know He signed some of those players too... just like he forked out millions for SWP, yet they failed at Chelsea or didnt get enough play time.

So the fact that you are relying on something Mourinho has "SAID" here means nothing, surely you who is so quick at criticising other players can realise that... or maybe your love-bias is just too strong.

Do you see the similarity here? Mikel just hasn't gone through the cycle yet.

 

[kaycee2g]

ShearerM4,

Mourinho id not sign Parker, Johnson, Bridge and Duff. those were all Ranieri signings. Its pretty shallow to tell lies here.

The only English Player Jose has signed in his career is Ashley Cole. Clearly, he does not think highly of English talent.

By the way, let me add Carlton Cole to that. As u can see he threw carlton cole out an replaced him with Kalou.

 

[ShearerM4]

ShearerM4,

Mourinho id not sign Parker, Johnson, Bridge and Duff. those were all Ranieri signings. Its pretty shallow to tell lies here.

The only English Player Jose has signed in his career is Ashley Cole. Clearly, he does not think highly of English talent.

By the way, let me add Carlton Cole to that. As u can see he threw carlton cole out an replaced him with Kalou.

kaycee2g,

please use your brain instead of taking everything literaly ALL THE TIME. He did play all those players for his first season at Chelsea, but I'm realising you probably didn't know that since you probably didn't know what Chelsea was back then. You can take one or two examples to say anything.

 

[kaycee2g]

SM4,

He rarely played Parker, because he was not good enough
He sent Carlton Cole on loan because he was not good enough
He Played a central back - Gallas - at right back even when Bridge was fit
He Played Ferreira ahea of Johnson
Duff is not English

As u can see, my friend, u are the one making things up. Jose never trusted these players and has bought only one English player since he started coaching!