• This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:

    1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.

    2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.

    3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.

    Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.

    Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.

    Thank you!

Coldplay's New Album "x&y", Out June 6, 2005

aftab

Youth Team
Coldplay have released the cover art for their new album, entitled X&Y, which is to be released 6th June 2005. The first single on the album, Speed of Sound, will make it's worldwide radio debut on Monday April 18th, 2005 at Radio 1.

Immediately following this, the single will be available to listen to using the new "Coldplayer" at Coldplay.com!

The announcement was made by email to members of the Coldplay websites’ In My Place member area. The announcement, which also contained the 12-track listing, continued:

Not to sure what word best describes it, but candiates are ‘interesting’ and ‘random’. The album, called X&Y will be released officially on 6th June and the tracklist is shown below. The song ‘Talk’ has been floating around the net for a few weeks, and is pretty pleasant. The press have said that the band weren’t sure whether whether or not to include it once it had been leaked, but I’m glad it’s there.


Tracklist:

1. Square One
2. What If’
3. White Shadows
4. Fix You
5. Talk
6. X&Y
7. Speed Of Sound
8. A Message
9. Low
10. The Hardest Part
11. Swallowed In The Sea
12. Twisted Logic
 
V

Virgo

Guest
aftab said:
Immediately following this, the single will be available to listen to using the new "Coldplayer" at Coldplay.com!

why oh why...?

bet they're gonna try to sell us IPods next
 

Jambo Den

Fan Favourite
Jesus, VH1 were right. With such "innovative" bands such as Athlete and Coldplay bound to be the masses' choice this summer, seems there will be a Coup d'Etat for blandness! :|:(

Looks like I'm gonnae huv tae take back this country all by myself.... *tunes guitar into woeful wail and practices best thrashes* (H)
 

INFESTA

Official
Their last album was really good, but left very few escape routes for the band to be good AND fresh at the same time. I expect this effort to be more of the same, which, in this case, means 'more is less'. A couple radio-friendly singles to annoy our summer might be on the way, though.

Nice sig, Denis. :ewan:
 

emmer

Senior Squad
The New York Times
June 5, 2005

The Case Against Coldplay
By JON PARELES


THERE'S nothing wrong with self-pity. As a spur to songwriting, it's right up there with lust, anger and greed, and probably better than the remaining deadly sins. There's nothing wrong, either, with striving for musical grandeur, using every bit of skill and studio illusion to create a sound large enough to get lost in. Male sensitivity, a quality that's under siege in a pop culture full of unrepentant bullying and machismo, shouldn't be dismissed out of hand, no matter how risible it can be in practice. And building a sound on the lessons of past bands is virtually unavoidable.

But put them all together and they add up to Coldplay, the most insufferable band of the decade.

This week Coldplay releases its painstakingly recorded third album, "X&Y" (Capitol), a virtually surefire blockbuster that has corporate fortunes riding on it. (The stock price plunged for EMI Group, Capitol's parent company, when Coldplay announced that the album's release date would be moved from February to June, as it continued to rework the songs.)

"X&Y" is the work of a band that's acutely conscious of the worldwide popularity it cemented with its 2002 album, "A Rush of Blood to the Head," which has sold three million copies in the United States alone. Along with its 2000 debut album, "Parachutes," Coldplay claims sales of 20 million albums worldwide. "X&Y" makes no secret of grand ambition.

Clearly, Coldplay is beloved: by moony high school girls and their solace-seeking parents, by hip-hop producers who sample its rich instrumental sounds and by emo rockers who admire Chris Martin's heart-on-sleeve lyrics. The band emanates good intentions, from Mr. Martin's political statements to lyrics insisting on its own benevolence. Coldplay is admired by everyone - everyone except me.

It's not for lack of skill. The band proffers melodies as imposing as Romanesque architecture, solid and symmetrical. Mr. Martin on keyboards, Jonny Buckland on guitar, Guy Berryman on bass and Will Champion on drums have mastered all the mechanics of pop songwriting, from the instrumental hook that announces nearly every song they've recorded to the reassurance of a chorus to the revitalizing contrast of a bridge. Their arrangements ascend and surge, measuring out the song's yearning and tension, cresting and easing back and then moving toward a chiming resolution. Coldplay is meticulously unified, and its songs have been rigorously cleared of anything that distracts from the musical drama.

Unfortunately, all that sonic splendor orchestrates Mr. Martin's voice and lyrics. He places his melodies near the top of his range to sound more fragile, so the tunes straddle the break between his radiant tenor voice and his falsetto. As he hops between them - in what may be Coldplay's most annoying tic - he makes a sound somewhere between a yodel and a hiccup. And the lyrics can make me wish I didn't understand English. Coldplay's countless fans seem to take comfort when Mr. Martin sings lines like, "Is there anybody out there who / Is lost and hurt and lonely too," while a strummed acoustic guitar telegraphs his aching sincerity. Me, I hear a passive-aggressive blowhard, immoderately proud as he flaunts humility. "I feel low," he announces in the chorus of "Low," belied by the peak of a crescendo that couldn't be more triumphant about it.

In its early days, Coldplay could easily be summed up as Radiohead minus Radiohead's beat, dissonance or arty subterfuge. Both bands looked to the overarching melodies of 1970's British rock and to the guitar dynamics of U2, and Mr. Martin had clearly heard both Bono's delivery and the way Radiohead's Thom Yorke stretched his voice to the creaking point.

Unlike Radiohead, though, Coldplay had no interest in being oblique or barbed. From the beginning, Coldplay's songs topped majesty with moping: "We're sinking like stones," Mr. Martin proclaimed. Hardly alone among British rock bands as the 1990's ended, Coldplay could have been singing not only about private sorrows but also about the final sunset on the British empire: the old opulence meeting newly shrunken horizons. Coldplay's songs wallowed happily in their unhappiness.

"Am I a part of the cure / Or am I part of the disease," Mr. Martin pondered in "Clocks" on "A Rush of Blood to the Head." Actually, he's contagious. Particularly in its native England, Coldplay has spawned a generation of one-word bands - Athlete, Embrace, Keane, Starsailor, Travis and Aqualung among them - that are more than eager to follow through on Coldplay's tremulous, ringing anthems of insecurity. The emulation is spreading overseas to bands like the Perishers from Sweden and the American band Blue Merle, which tries to be Coldplay unplugged.

A band shouldn't necessarily be blamed for its imitators - ask the Cure or the Grateful Dead. But Coldplay follow-throughs are redundant; from the beginning, Coldplay has verged on self-parody. When he moans his verses, Mr. Martin can sound so sorry for himself that there's hardly room to sympathize for him, and when he's not mixing metaphors, he fearlessly slings clichés. "Are you lost or incomplete," Mr. Martin sings in "Talk," which won't be cited in any rhyming dictionaries. "Do you feel like a puzzle / you can't find your missing piece."

Coldplay reached its musical zenith with the widely sampled piano arpeggios that open "Clocks": a passage that rings gladly and, as it descends the scale and switches from major to minor chords, turns incipiently mournful. Of course, it's followed by plaints: "Tides that I tried to swim against / Brought me down upon my knees."

On "X&Y," Coldplay strives to carry the beauty of "Clocks" across an entire album - not least in its first single, "Speed of Sound," which isn't the only song on the album to borrow the "Clocks" drumbeat. The album is faultless to a fault, with instrumental tracks purged of any glimmer of human frailty. There is not an unconsidered or misplaced note on "X&Y," and every song (except the obligatory acoustic "hidden track" at the end, which is still by no means casual) takes place on a monumental soundstage.

As Coldplay's recording budgets have grown, so have its reverberation times. On "X&Y," it plays as if it can already hear the songs echoing across the world. "Square One," which opens the album, actually begins with guitar notes hinting at the cosmic fanfare of "Also Sprach Zarathustra" (and "2001: A Space Odyssey"). Then Mr. Martin, never someone to evade the obvious, sings about "the space in which we're traveling."

As a blockbuster band, Coldplay is now looking over its shoulder at titanic predecessors like U2, Pink Floyd and the Beatles, pilfering freely from all of them. It also looks to an older legacy; in many songs, organ chords resonate in the spaces around Mr. Martin's voice, insisting on churchly reverence.

As Coldplay's music has grown more colossal, its lyrics have quietly made a shift on "X&Y." On previous albums, Mr. Martin sang mostly in the first person, confessing to private vulnerabilities. This time, he sings a lot about "you": a lover, a brother, a random acquaintance. He has a lot of pronouncements and advice for all of them: "You just want somebody listening to what you say," and "Every step that you take could be your biggest mistake," and "Maybe you'll get what you wanted, maybe you'll stumble upon it" and "You don't have to be alone." It's supposed to be compassionate, empathetic, magnanimous, inspirational. But when the music swells up once more with tremolo guitars and chiming keyboards, and Mr. Martin's voice breaks for the umpteenth time, it sounds like hokum to me.
 

INFESTA

Official
Even more annoying than Coldplay's music is Mr. Pareles' habbit of calling singer Chris Martin 'Mr. Martin'. Every time I read it felt like smacking his face.

I got to say the case against Coldplay is fairly weak. At least this case. Most of the stuff he complains about is purely personal and subjective.
The only real reason why Coldplay will likely suck on their new album [already have it but didn't have enough patience to go through it so far] is subject to just one paragraph in this review(is it really a review?), which says a lot about the writer's intentions and musical depth:

On "X&Y," Coldplay strives to carry the beauty of "Clocks" across an entire album - not least in its first single, "Speed of Sound," which isn't the only song on the album to borrow the "Clocks" drumbeat. The album is faultless to a fault, with instrumental tracks purged of any glimmer of human frailty. There is not an unconsidered or misplaced note on "X&Y," and every song (except the obligatory acoustic "hidden track" at the end, which is still by no means casual) takes place on a monumental soundstage.

As I mentioned in a previous post, Coldplay's new album will likely be a more-of-the-same fest. Apparently it turned out to be that way.
Having said all that, 'Speed Of Sound', their new single, is a great tune, and there are few bands in the planet with the talent to write it.


Finally, I totally dismiss this article because the author has no idea whatsoever of what he's talking about. Here's proof:

Particularly in its native England, Coldplay has spawned a generation of one-word bands - Athlete, Embrace, Keane, Starsailor, Travis and Aqualung among them - that are more than eager to follow through on Coldplay's tremulous, ringing anthems of insecurity.

How can someone write this on such a big newspaper? A simple 5-minute search would be enough to realize Travis is not only older than Coldplay, but they've also achieved success earlier. Although they play a similar genre, it is totally apocryphal to say they've been spawned by Coldplay.


A word of advice to Coldplay: next time you play New York send an invite to the NY Times. Journalists's egos - especially critics - can only be compared to those of rock and movie stars.
 

mhflierman

Starting XI
Rollingstone.com doesn't rate the album exactl brilliant. I haven't heard it, but it'll probably sound much like A Rush Of Blood To The Head. It's hard to sound new, fresh and better when you've already put out an album like AROBTTH...
 

fender

Fan Favourite
I really like the first single Speed Of Sound gets better with time. I think X&Y has the same feel as AROBTTH, they don't stray away from their distinct sound probably don't want to make too many changes since they've already got things working for them.
 

PhiLLer

Fan Favourite
It's a bit different to A Rush Of Blood To The Head, it's still Coldplay of course but it does differ. Unlike Parachutes or A Rush Of Blood To The Head, this is an album that has to grow on you, you have to heard a few times before you really appreciate and enjoy it. The songwriting is strong as ever and the band have obviously improved on their intrumental playing and vocals.
Another solid Coldplay album that varies a little from the rest but still has the recognisable Coldplay sound that won't alienate the fans.

It's funny how bashing Coldplay seems to be the flavour of the month. Everytime a band does well all of a sudden they become boring, "stupid to listen to" etc. I think they are great, one of the best current bands out there and I'm not ashamed to say it.
 

emmer

Senior Squad
well, i kind of agree with most of pareles' opinions.

INFESTA said:
Even more annoying than Coldplay's music is Mr. Pareles' habbit of calling singer Chris Martin 'Mr. Martin'. Every time I read it felt like smacking his face.

I got to say the case against Coldplay is fairly weak. At least this case. Most of the stuff he complains about is purely personal and subjective.
a review is personal and subjective, there's no way to make it different. i usually like that kind of review. lester bangs, for an example, used to write awesome reviews being very personal.

pareles says: "Coldplay is admired by everyone - everyone except me." he explicitly writes he doesn't like the band. that's way better than those lots of reviewers who try to sound objective, even it being impossible!

it's a matter of opinion, that's it. i just think there's no reason to attack the reviewer the way you did. subjectivity is far from being a deficiency or something. would you say your words about coldplay are objective? come on, hugo, you know objectivity is a myth.

and pareles' opinions are so close to mine. i love what he wrote about chris' lyrics and voice (in that point i agree with shindig as well).

INFESTA said:
How can someone write this on such a big newspaper? A simple 5-minute search would be enough to realize Travis is not only older than Coldplay, but they've also achieved success earlier. Although they play a similar genre, it is totally apocryphal to say they've been spawned by Coldplay.

aye, i thought the same when i read travis there. i remember how coldplay was compared to travis when they appeared. i agree he shouldn't have a place on the new york times. but i like the article overall, for the simple reason i agree with most of his opinions. and you probably would like it if he wrote a favourable review, or am i wrong? that's what your words insinuates anyway...

oh, and i agree about the journalists' egos also. i'm one of them afterall... ;)


PhiLLer said:
It's funny how bashing Coldplay seems to be the flavour of the month. Everytime a band does well all of a sudden they become boring, "stupid to listen to" etc. I think they are great, one of the best current bands out there and I'm not ashamed to say it.
well, i bash coldplay (and travis and other bands like them) since their early singles. but i admit i do it mostly for "fun" nowadays. (6)
 

INFESTA

Official
emmer said:
a review is personal and subjective, there's no way to make it different. i usually like that kind of review. lester bangs, for an example, used to write awesome reviews being very personal.

Point n.1) Here's where I'm coming from: someone who's been in a band who always looked at their music as art. I've dealt with my fair share of critics, reviews, journalists and audience in general, either through my own experiences or by other bands who I happen to be friends with.


Point n.2) Every REM fan has heard the name Lester Bangs at least 100 times. Those who are curious found out about him. I'm an REM fan and curious by nature. :)


Point n.3) A review is personal and subjective, we agree on that, but if we are to look upon music or cinema or books as art and not as a commercial product, then the reviewer better focus on a couple subjects, namely:
a) author's honesty;
b) freshness or, to use a more appropriate word, originality (or the intention to come up with something new);
c) Does the author secceed in what he set out to accomplish?
d) Finally, the reviewer's personal liking of the author's work.

With the exception of one lost paragraph in the middle of the hatred spilled by Pareles, he only focused on d).
Example: what do I care if Pareles finds Martin's falsettos irritating? I'm sure many will agree with him, but many won't. So what is the point? You can never please everybody, so a good artist lives with this notion and moves on. So should critics.


Point n.4) As an art consumer, the ultimate Graal for me is being given the chance to like someone's work by what it is. In another words, I don't want to find some copycat material but rather something new and fresh; faced with it, my choice will be either to like it or not, and that's the most honest choice an artist can give you!

My point as an artist was always to look for new solutions, a new sound - or at least one that wouldn't remind you of another band you've heard before. Honestly, whenever someone told me they didn't like my band bcs it was too different, I felt as if my job was done.
I'm just stating my personal experience to further explain my point of view on art - music more specifically - and reviews in general.


Point n.5) Reviewers, especially Music Critics (and, like I said, I've known my fair share), are frustrated musicians. You have to admit it. :p


Point n.6) I am still to give my take on Coldplay's new album and their relevance to the musical scene. Already have the album, promise to write something after listening to it carefully.
 

mhflierman

Starting XI
INFESTA said:
Point n.6) I am still to give my take on Coldplay's new album and their relevance to the musical scene. Already have the album, promise to write something after listening to it carefully.

That should be interesting (H).

Their relevance to the musical scene is abvious: Keane, Snow Patrol and 100s of other of those whining-ish bands. :(
 
V

Virgo

Guest
You know what bugs me more about Coldplay is that they're hardly original, and when I saw their debut album I thought they were a breat of fresh air, but I was wrong. It has became one of the most boring bands out there and most of their songs sound the same. Of course if you like that sound you're probably happy.
There are LOTS of relatively similar bands out there with MUCH more talent that get much less recognition (if you take MTV airtime as recognition). dEUS for example is one of them but there are so much more.
 


Top