• This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:

    1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.

    2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.

    3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.

    Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.

    Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.

    Thank you!

FIFA 16 News

Chuny

Chairman
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Let's not start the FIFA v.s PES fight again. But...



 

bangus

Starting XI
Shifty*nim;3839882 said:
not good in 3840x2160 Resolution my pc
I see, so because this is all about you, the rest of us have to wait 30 seconds for these pages to load and then scroll east a few hundred yards in order to view your entire screenshot. Yeah, that's just great man.
 

Sami 1999

Reserve Team
bangus;3839889 said:
I see, so because this is all about you, the rest of us have to wait 30 seconds for these pages to load and then scroll east a few hundred yards in order to view your entire screenshot. Yeah, that's just great man.

There is a screen resize option and show/hide option in evo web forum which is using VBulletin too. We should rather have that feature too instead of resizing pictures.
 

bangus

Starting XI
Sami 1999;3839897 said:
There is a screen resize option and show/hide option in evo web forum which is using VBulletin too. We should rather have that feature too instead of resizing pictures.
Sure, and in the meantime do we REALLY need to see Suarez's nose hairs in "Look at me, I've got 3840x2160 resolution" in order to get the point?

 

jeetmusic

Fan Favourite
i agree with Cris, PES has few good faces while FIFA has much much more real scanned faces.so there the argument ends.
 

regularcat

Manager
Moderator
bangus;3839911 said:
Sure, and in the meantime do we REALLY need to see Suarez's nose hairs in "Look at me, I've got 3840x2160 resolution" in order to get the point?


The funniest part of this entire argument is when you play the game
you never see his face unless it is a replay.
 

Chuny

Chairman
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Bangus you are hysteric, man. Here, on Evo-Web, wherever. Chill out pal.
 

Chuny

Chairman
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
regularcat;3839949 said:
The funniest part of this entire argument is when you play the game
you never see his face unless it is a replay.

I know, but to me every detail counts. I could go the opposite way and say that on close-up cameras and cinematics, grass in FIFA looks miles ahead of PES. But from regular gameplay camera neither game has been able to get turfs spot on.
 

jeetmusic

Fan Favourite
regularcat;3839949 said:
The funniest part of this entire argument is when you play the game
you never see his face unless it is a replay.

what abt cinematics & animations?

they seem far more realistic when you have a scanned face rather than a zombie one.
 

Sami 1999

Reserve Team
For those who saying that we don't need graphics.. keep in mind that we're paying $70 for this game. Even $40 games look 10x better than Fifa. If it was $35- then the whole graphic doesn't matter would make sense.
 

Sami 1999

Reserve Team
bangus;3839911 said:
Sure, and in the meantime do we REALLY need to see Suarez's nose hairs in "Look at me, I've got 3840x2160 resolution" in order to get the point?


No, we don't need it in the meantime. It took 4 minutes to load this page with my internet.

Btw, Suarez kinda looks hot in Fifa 15. And he looka like retard in Pes 15.
 

bulkan

Senior Squad
Sami 1999;3839149 said:
I agree with you. But in my opinion:

1. Kit wrinkles:

*FIFA 14 Demo PC: The wrinkles of player in moving position looked best. But while they are standing- wrinkle looked bad.

*FIFA 14 Full version: Exactly the opposite. The wrinkles looked horrible while players are in moving position and looked good when they are standing w/o movement.

*FIFA 13/12/11: Looked great in every possible ways.

*FIFA 10/09 [Ps3/360]: Looked same as 13 but slightly different. Better in my opinion.

*FIFA 08 [Ps3/360]: Looked slightly different from FIFA 09, and nice too.

*FIFA 15: I actually liked it and its better than FIFA 14 full version kit wrinkle. But not better than FIFA 14 Demo PC. And somehow it looks bad on FIFA 16 kit models.

^Keep in mind that FIFA 14 Full version kit wrinkle is same in both Old and NG version.


2. kit models/animations:

*FIFA 14/ PES 14: Both shirt and pant models moved.

*FIFA 15/PES 15: Only pants move.


My final opinion:

I think they should have kit wrinkle a mixed version of FIFA 14 demo/ full:

Moving wrinkle textures of FIFA 14 Demo+ Standing still w/o textures of FIFA 14 full version.

Kit 3D models doesn't look that good in any versions of the game. They need to improve the FIFA 16 ones a lot. Especially the pants and hand. And they need fix in the waist-chest part [They look like barrel/cylinder]. And they need to bring back shirt animation.



Being that said, we really need a version of rx3 master that can open kit wrinkle files properly. I can easily edit FIFA 09-10, PES 10-13 kit wrinkles. Even PES 14 is possible [Even though I'm having slight problems in PES 14].

We need a new Tool for kit wrinkle.


Edit: There are some specific files which affect the grass colors/ lighting dirrectly. But unfortunately, we haven't found those files yet. Gotta check the ".big" files again, there should the the files of lighting, grass, 3d grass intensity etc.

i've tried to implement the fifa 14 old gen demo files into fifa 15. what do you think;

http://i.hizliresim.com/WZndZ8.png

http://i.hizliresim.com/pogLoa.png

http://i.hizliresim.com/N4q74X.png

http://i.hizliresim.com/YlBAlZ.png

http://i.hizliresim.com/2kgbkA.png
 


Top