-
This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:
1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.
2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.
3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.
Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.
Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.
Thank you!
Fifa XP is much better than fed2002....
- Thread starter yim87
- Start date
Fifa XP is much better than fed2002....
You can't add new players with Fed 2002...you can't see the player's look changing when editing his values...
It's a pitty that Fifa XP has so much bugs, because so you have to use the Fed2002 that has only 10% of the function that the Fifa XP Editor has...
I draw the conclusion that Fed 99 and Fed 2001 have been much much much better!
You can't add new players with Fed 2002...you can't see the player's look changing when editing his values...
It's a pitty that Fifa XP has so much bugs, because so you have to use the Fed2002 that has only 10% of the function that the Fifa XP Editor has...
I draw the conclusion that Fed 99 and Fed 2001 have been much much much better!
BolzerMike
Reserve Team
rechts unten ist ein Button, da steht EDIT, nun mach mal schnell aus dem FifaFX ein FCDB_XP sonst denkt noch jemand FifaFX hätte einen Bug 
well . . .
i might have to disagree with two of your points.
u can see the changes u make with the face, and i tryed out fifa fx, and no offence the people who spent thier time making it but i didn't like it that much, it had too many bugs and didn't work on my computer.
FEd is not a bad effort if u ask me.
i might have to disagree with two of your points.
u can see the changes u make with the face, and i tryed out fifa fx, and no offence the people who spent thier time making it but i didn't like it that much, it had too many bugs and didn't work on my computer.
FEd is not a bad effort if u ask me.
Well would u rather a program that works, or a program that would be cool if it did?
See with Fed, Chau is planning to release a heap of these features in later versions of it. He hasnt done it in this version, because he has spent all of his free time getting the program as it is, and actually working! I know as a beta tester, that right up until the last days there were still some small bugs to iron out. Chau makes sure these are gone before trying to make anything too big. What is the point of something with a huge feature list if it doesnt work.
Im betting more ppl download Fed, than FCDB XP, although Im sure Chau wouldnt mind if it was the other way around, and it quite possibly could be if all the bugs of FCDB were fixed, but this should have been done BEFORE release.
Anyway thats all
sKIp_E
See with Fed, Chau is planning to release a heap of these features in later versions of it. He hasnt done it in this version, because he has spent all of his free time getting the program as it is, and actually working! I know as a beta tester, that right up until the last days there were still some small bugs to iron out. Chau makes sure these are gone before trying to make anything too big. What is the point of something with a huge feature list if it doesnt work.
Im betting more ppl download Fed, than FCDB XP, although Im sure Chau wouldnt mind if it was the other way around, and it quite possibly could be if all the bugs of FCDB were fixed, but this should have been done BEFORE release.
Anyway thats all
sKIp_E
hmmm
To sKIp_E:
I might have to reconsider my vote, even tho i have only used FEd2002. Because FEd 2002 is littered with bugs, i find it only works when i am on the net, and also there should be system requirements cause sometimes when i open it it says out of memory.
damn, i just want something that works 
To sKIp_E:
I might have to reconsider my vote, even tho i have only used FEd2002. Because FEd 2002 is littered with bugs, i find it only works when i am on the net, and also there should be system requirements cause sometimes when i open it it says out of memory.
damn, i just want something that works
Diego colombia
Youth Team
in my point of view, FEd is much better than FCDB
FCDB takes a lot of time to load, too many bugs and the only thing I like more o fifa xp than fed 2002 in the 3d kit viewer.
That is my opinion
FCDB takes a lot of time to load, too many bugs and the only thing I like more o fifa xp than fed 2002 in the 3d kit viewer.
That is my opinion
lukas_svoboda
Senior Squad
Re: well . . .
Nonsense. Please can you specify what bugs you found in FifaFX ??? There are many great patches controled by FifaFX (FifaFX World Cup Patch, FifaMania Superpatch, Czech Super Patch, Dutch League, Argentinian League, Uruguay League, European Clubs Patch 2 (to be released soon),...). Do you think that all these great projects could be finished and released if there would be "many bugs" in FifaFX as you told ??? I have to say that FifaFX is still the best utility ever created for the FIFA series games and I love it.
If you have any probs with FifaFX, then don't hesitate and ask here. I am sure someone can help you.
Nonsense. Please can you specify what bugs you found in FifaFX ??? There are many great patches controled by FifaFX (FifaFX World Cup Patch, FifaMania Superpatch, Czech Super Patch, Dutch League, Argentinian League, Uruguay League, European Clubs Patch 2 (to be released soon),...). Do you think that all these great projects could be finished and released if there would be "many bugs" in FifaFX as you told ??? I have to say that FifaFX is still the best utility ever created for the FIFA series games and I love it.
If you have any probs with FifaFX, then don't hesitate and ask here. I am sure someone can help you.