Fulham V Manchester United [P+R]

[adnan2850]

right on.
we really should have won and we can't make any excuses for this loss.
we didn't have rvn but why the F#uck did we buy rooney saha and smith? we got em to replace rvn if needed. and they realy should have performed better and made those chances.

 

[Chelives]

Re: Re: Re: ask yourself!!

Originally posted by shez
my point is that giggs should've done better against a guy on his debut.... Man Utd should win these games because they're targeting the title while fulham have mcbride up front for an ambition...

ps: why insults lol

shez

I insulted you, because your previous message contained the biggest load of sh*t in this thread, and there is a lot of it! The players you mentioned are not Div 1 standard, they are prefectly good Premiership players. Why should Giggs have done better? When Ronaldo made his debut, should Boltons (i think) right back have done better? No, because he is class. Rosenior had Giggs and Ronaldo in his pocket, because he is a class defender.

If I offended you, sorry, but you offended me with your supirior tone of your previous post.

 

[b-ytter]

I think Rosenior was one of the best Fulham players,Played like he had been in EPL for years!

 

[Help?]

Rosenior did well, but he never had Ronaldo in his pocket. Ronaldo was running past everyone in his way, whether he played on the right or left. And like i said, the only thing Fulham defenders could do to him is make dangerous challenges that would surely get him off his feet.

 

[shez]

Re: Re: Re: Re: ask yourself!!

Originally posted by Chelives
I insulted you, because your previous message contained the biggest load of sh*t in this thread, and there is a lot of it! The players you mentioned are not Div 1 standard, they are prefectly good Premiership players. Why should Giggs have done better? When Ronaldo made his debut, should Boltons (i think) right back have done better? No, because he is class. Rosenior had Giggs and Ronaldo in his pocket, because he is a class defender.

If I offended you, sorry, but you offended me with your supirior tone of your previous post.

Im not trying to convince anyone with my opinion im just saying what i think... and i think that as good as Fulham are, Man Utd should do better than they did as individuals or as a team....thats is if they want to win the title....

also i don't think Ronaldo was in anyobdy's pocket last night...

tonight Liverpool fell in the same trap with harry Kewel not performing....

respect

Shez

 

[ryan_goal]

Am I the only one who thinks we played like Barca in the first half of this game??!!
Every single player in the team was just clicking!

The second half was so crap though that I fall asleep and missed the equalizer.

 

[Chelives]

Originally posted by Help?
Rosenior did well, but he never had Ronaldo in his pocket. Ronaldo was running past everyone in his way, whether he played on the right or left. And like i said, the only thing Fulham defenders could do to him is make dangerous challenges that would surely get him off his feet.

Don't know how much you guys see from your airchairs, but that wasnt the case at the game. Ronaldo does look class, but he had to resort from staying out wide and taking on defenders with width because that was all he could do. As for dangerous tackles, thats b*llocks. Fair enough, Bocanegra went in harder than he usually does, but not dangerously. Rosenior would let Ronaldo stay on the outside, let him do all the fancy sh*t he does till he gets to the bar line and then take the ball of him.

In all fairness though, Ronaldo is a great player, he had moments of class, but seeing it from the stands and not through Sky, I would have said the term 'in his pocket' was about right. BTW Roy Keane was superb, real class.

Funny how no one mentions Ronaldo's dive??!!

Oh to the American dude, just re-read all your messages. Fair play. Just that when I read it the first time in stunk of supiroirness. Fair play to ya.

 

[Virgo]

it wasn't a dive it was an attempt to force a penalty. He was definitely fouled, but outside the box. He just walked another step and threw himself to the ground.

 

[adj137]

You can insult Fulham's players all you want, but u crawing with us, they doesn't look to good on Man utd.

Someone please remind me how much Man utd spend on attacking players this year ?

 

[Help?]

Originally posted by Chelives
Don't know how much you guys see from your airchairs, but that wasnt the case at the game. Ronaldo does look class, but he had to resort from staying out wide and taking on defenders with width because that was all he could do. As for dangerous tackles, thats b*llocks. Fair enough, Bocanegra went in harder than he usually does, but not dangerously. Rosenior would let Ronaldo stay on the outside, let him do all the fancy sh*t he does till he gets to the bar line and then take the ball of him.

In all fairness though, Ronaldo is a great player, he had moments of class, but seeing it from the stands and not through Sky, I would have said the term 'in his pocket' was about right. BTW Roy Keane was superb, real class.

Funny how no one mentions Ronaldo's dive??!!

Oh to the American dude, just re-read all your messages. Fair play. Just that when I read it the first time in stunk of supiroirness. Fair play to ya.

If you watched other Man Utd games you would know, that all Ronaldo does is takes the ball runs down the side and crosses it, he rarely goes to the middle. It's his job to drive defenders away to the side to have more space for forwards to shoot. And if you watched from a stadium, then you probably saw it as a dive, but if you would have seen it on tv replay you would see that whoever the defender was he tripped Ronaldo. Yes Ronaldo didn't have a ball by that time, but he clearly got tripped, that was never a dive, anybody would have fallen over like that. And the reason why it looked like he went down after the challenge is because when someone actually trips you, you don't go down that instant second, you first try to stay one and then when you feet still won't hold you fall. Now Pires' fk from where Henry scored, that was a dive, but Ronaldo didn't fall without contact. So it wasn't a dive and it would have been too harsh to call it a penalty.