RealMatriX
Youth Team
yeh im supposed to prove that 64 not = 65. i know it sounds kind of stupid, but if you know this one, b/c i don't, then please help, ty.
-
This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:
1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.
2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.
3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.
Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.
Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.
Thank you!
Help needed for my discrete hw (proving stuff)
- Thread starter RealMatriX
- Start date
RealMatriX
Youth Team
lol, no smart ppl in this forum (yet)
manutd4eva
Fan Favourite
That's a tough one
LOCOlombia
Starting XI
I know it has to do something with the length of the line being equal in both...Stunna that was funny...
It's the same shapes but formed differently to form a rectangle. What exact proof does this douchebag want? Just cut-out the pieces put them over the other pieces and if they say **** tell em' to **** off.
Edit-oh youre proving its NOT the same?
Edit-oh youre proving its NOT the same?
Spurs4Life
Starting XI
Originally posted by #1 Stunna
i cant help you cuz well...i'm at work...but man i hate that little guy scratching his head...he was on EVERY one of my assignments.
LMAO
Took a stab at a graphical/wordical remake.
Anyways...
The A piece remains the same and slid(sliden slided?) to the right.
The D piece is rotated COUNTER-clockwise 90 degrees and is moved to the far right.
The B piece is rotated COUNTER-clockwise 90 degrees and moved to the far left.
The C piece remains the same and is slid down.
Anyways...
The A piece remains the same and slid(sliden slided?) to the right.
The D piece is rotated COUNTER-clockwise 90 degrees and is moved to the far right.
The B piece is rotated COUNTER-clockwise 90 degrees and moved to the far left.
The C piece remains the same and is slid down.
RealMatriX
Youth Team
thanx, but you didn't really prove anything, she wants me to prove that the one that says 65 is not equal to the one that says 64...?...i kinda got lost there
What I had was a geometrical way of proving it IS...
That bitch is crazy if she's saying it ain't equal....
Edit-my guess would be that the shapes are congruent only because of perimeter, rather than area.
ok i got it, its simple:
look at the two triangles A and C. in the first figure their hypotenuses only overlap by a few squares. But in figure 2, the ENTIRE hypotenuses of the triangles are used up. As a result, it is very reasonable that figure 1 would take up more space then figure 2 because figure 2 has more overlapping areas.
Same idea with the quadraleterals B and D. the quadralaterals in figure 1 are more "indenpendent" (so to speak) than in figure 2.
Hoped I helped you out bud.
look at the two triangles A and C. in the first figure their hypotenuses only overlap by a few squares. But in figure 2, the ENTIRE hypotenuses of the triangles are used up. As a result, it is very reasonable that figure 1 would take up more space then figure 2 because figure 2 has more overlapping areas.
Same idea with the quadraleterals B and D. the quadralaterals in figure 1 are more "indenpendent" (so to speak) than in figure 2.
Hoped I helped you out bud.
RealMatriX
Youth Team
Originally posted by ButTcRacK
lol by this time in guessing you already turned in ur assignment?
lol, yup, and you know what the stupid answer was. you just have to show the the slope of the diagonal in the first one was 5/13 whilst in the other one it was 3/8. quite stupid, don't even know why im taking this course, o well, thanx everyone who helped or tried to help