::shinji::
Min
yeah these beheadings have nothing to do with Al-Sadr, in fact he's spoken against the kidnapping of foreigners and even issued threats to foreign fighters, calling them "enemies of Iraq" ...so I've read.
This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:
1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.
2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.
3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.
Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.
Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.
Thank you!
Originally posted by Virgo
that's the whole problem isn't it? You have absolutely no clue how to catch them.
Am I blaming anyone directly? I said that bcs Bush should acknowledge the direct and indirect consequences of his actions and he just doesn't.
While he was making a cute speech in the UN an innocent american was having his head chopped off with a freakin stilletto.
Originally posted by Vagegast
This is not Al-Sadr, but Al-Zarqawi. Hey Elder, check this out. NBC News; March 2nd, 2004.Would've those people be beheaded if Zarqawi was killed/hurt?
Originally posted by ::shinji::
yeah these beheadings have nothing to do with Al-Sadr, in fact he's spoken against the kidnapping of foreigners and even issued threats to foreign fighters, calling them "enemies of Iraq" ...so I've read.
Originally posted by Elder
. (there were al Queda ties in Iraq folks...)
Originally posted by Elder
(there were al Queda ties in Iraq folks...)
Originally posted by Brondbyfan
As AA says, the first step is admitting you have a problem. And that is why Bush will never, ever be able to fix the problem in Iraq: because he won't even take that first step. He continues to project a fantasy land where everything in Iraq is going well. And it's not working anymore. That's why even high ranking Republicans like McCain and Hagel and Lugar are criticizing his Iraq policy. The only possible solution now, and even this might not work because Bush has failed so miserably, is international involvement. And Bush will never get that. He's too despised around the world. No leader will cooperate with him, it's political suicide. And this is just the tip of the iceberg. Bush is also failing to admit the problems in his execution of the war on terror and the economy, so we will continue to fail to stop terrorism as Vagegast's post showed, and we will continue to have record low revenue and record high deficits as long as Bush is president.
Originally posted by Brondbyfan
Oh it's very clear they had no idea what they were getting into. Remember Cheney saying Americans would be greeted as liberators? Remember Bush's infantile publicity stunt in which he declared "Mission Accomplished?" They were clueless then, and they're clueless now. It's as if Bush expects Iraqi Security Forces to magically spring up from the ground to fix everything, and Bush won't do anything until that happens (in the mean time, Rumsfeld can simply lie like a rat about them). He doesn't understand the situation, and he's got to go not only because he cannot handle Iraq, but should a situation arise in the world, we are doomed with Bush's strategy of no strategy.
You and Fox News and Bush and Cheney can say that all you want, but the 9/11 Commission says you're all liars.
No Evidence Connection Iraq to Al Qaeda, 9/11 Panel Says (washingtonpost.com)
Originally posted by JTNY
To clarify, this is the link of Eugene Armstrong's beheading, not one clean swipe but about 45 seconds of.... followed by
Seriously, most gruesome thing I've ever seen.
As requested huge warning: This is a bad one
Click on it at your own peril.
Originally posted by Brondbyfan
Elder, I'm waiting to see how this goes, the latest news is that a likely source of the memos was Roger Stone, long time GOP operative known for pulling "dirty tricks" for Nixon. He has refused to deny it, which you would take to mean he's guilty. So we'll see what happens.
And in the meantime, stop spreading Bush-ite lies about Iraq/Al Qaeda relationships, the 9/11 Commission said you're wrong months ago.
Originally posted by Elder
Roger Stone did deny it, and called McCaullife out to produce the evidence he did it. I was searching for a link to the story, but I can't find it yet.
And otherwise, I don't care if it was a GOP or a Demoratic party person who did the forged documents. The story was still a fraud, just as the documents were. That's enough for me.
As for the al Queda links... Zarqawi had a base within the borders of Iraq. Those are the facts Carlos. But it's really not worth debating anymore, because some people will believe what they want to believe.
Originally posted by rhizome17
The base was in Kurdish controlled Northern Iraq. Saddam Hussein had no control over this area. When will you realise?
Originally posted by rhizome17
Noones defending him. That was done by your lot while he was gassing the Kurds. Like i said, he had no control over the Kurdish area after your lot had created the free zone under the guise of protecting the Kurds. So it was actually up to them or your government to do something about the base, not him. There is a major difference between defending Saddam, and pointing out what was logically impossible for him to do. It was your planes that patrolled the goddamn area ffs.