This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:
1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.
2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.
3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.
Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.
Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.
Thank you!
nigerianmiracle;2877873 said:Wasn't Nani supposed to be Giggs' replacement?
RockShow;2878071 said:i dont see a problem here, SAF has usually gone out and spend on one major buy 30 mill in the old days maybe one a year. but looking at the history of those transfers there have been few successes. rio, rvn keane(only 3 ill but it was a record at the time). historyically he is gotten much better mileage out of the second teir stars he had brought in, like carrick, hargreaves, Ole Gunnar, evra, vidic etc to name a few, some of which becoame world class playing for us. and his youth players.
all the people wanting to spent 40-60 mill on super stars has no idea where SAF has built uniteds success in the past.
he will only ever spend on big money stars if he thinks they are worth it. and right now, for the psoition we are after the is only one player worth the asking prices right now, and that is torres. gl getting him.
cfdemarco;2878739 said:Anyone watch the England/Japan game?
Rooney had a terrible game. Only one promising shot really, and 95% of his passes were off target and intercepted. If England play like that in the WC they are not going to go far.
cfdemarco;2878739 said:Anyone watch the England/Japan game?
Rooney had a terrible game. Only one promising shot really, and 95% of his passes were off target and intercepted. If England play like that in the WC they are not going to go far.
mnj2x;2878857 said:Rooney rarely plays well for England.