-
This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:
1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.
2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.
3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.
Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.
Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.
Thank you!
Manchester United Thread [2004-2005]
- Thread starter shokz
- Start date
- Status
trying 2 sweettalk what toure didDespite the fact that there were little to no replays of the incident which was inconclusive at the best when you'd see it in full motion.
Sweettalk? No, I was just merely rebutting whatever you were trying to claim with that picture. If you want to discuss the Toure incident you should have:
A) Gotten a better picture, of him actually diving (if he did)
Not post the picture at all
C) Not say anything at all, which I believe is most appropriate for you because you seem to have the mental capacity of an ostrich.
Sweettalk? No, I was just merely rebutting whatever you were trying to claim with that picture. If you want to discuss the Toure incident you should have:
A) Gotten a better picture, of him actually diving (if he did)
Not post the picture at allC) Not say anything at all, which I believe is most appropriate for you because you seem to have the mental capacity of an ostrich.
mhflierman
Starting XI
Just let go man. I understand your anger and rants, but calling our players like Neville who did well yesterday a "bitter twat-faced ****" is just pointless.
This point I don't get. You've said: "Not really, because who says the second foul would have even OCCURED if the first foul wasn't given? If the first foul was given and the second was, then yes you could say justice was served. Not in this case."
Do you mean they exclude each other? If the first foul hadn't been given, the second one would never had occured? If so, then I completely disagree. But I may have misunderstood your quote.
This point I don't get. You've said: "Not really, because who says the second foul would have even OCCURED if the first foul wasn't given? If the first foul was given and the second was, then yes you could say justice was served. Not in this case."
Do you mean they exclude each other? If the first foul hadn't been given, the second one would never had occured? If so, then I completely disagree. But I may have misunderstood your quote.
I don't see the relation between the two fouls either (Rooney and Ronaldo). Even if the Rooney one hadnt' taken place, United were still putting on the pressure, the second incident wasn't some brilliant buildup, Ronaldo danced his way into the penalty area and got fouled. I fail to see how the outcome could have possibly been altered.
Would United be have as much confidence and be pressing as well as they did if they hadn't received that penalty? That penalty was a huge dent for Arsenal's confidence, and if that penalty was not given I believe the outcome of the game would probably have been different. That's what I was talking about - just didn't state it clearly enough. Fault on my part.
That is what I believe (it's probably wrong), you may disagree with it but yeah.
That is what I believe (it's probably wrong), you may disagree with it but yeah.
Originally posted by Frostwolf
Despite the fact that there were little to no replays of the incident which was inconclusive at the best when you'd see it in full motion.
Sweettalk? No, I was just merely rebutting whatever you were trying to claim with that picture. If you want to discuss the Toure incident you should have:
A) Gotten a better picture, of him actually diving (if he did)
C) Not say anything at all, which I believe is most appropriate for you because you seem to have the mental capacity of an ostrich.
United argue they should have had a second spot-kick when Ashley Cole up-ended Cristiano Ronaldo and maybe that Rooney was simply cuter than Kolo Toure, who performed a SWAN-DIVE in the United box late on in a desperate bid to see Riley level things up.
source: skysports >>>> http://skysports.planetfootball.com...ID=1&lid=&title=How+will+the+champions+react?
need more prove?
i think you do talking about few years ago ljunberg elbow incident?
can't you guys just accept the defeat and stop the topic? as i said, there is still long run. who will be the champion still unknown. if you asking for banned or punishment, left it to FA make decision, they do study the video now.
FA charge Ruud, summon Wenger
Manchester United striker Ruud van Nistelrooy has been charged by the FA following the explosive match at Old Trafford yesterday.
Van Nistelrooy: Fouled Ashley Cole. (MichaelSteele/GettyImages)
Holland international van Nistelrooy has been charged with serious foul play following a challenge on Arsenal full-back Ashley Cole during the match which United won 2-0.
Under the FA's new fast-track disciplinary system van Nistelrooy's case will be dealt with on Thursday.
Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger has been asked to explain post-match comments about van Nistelrooy and referee Mike Riley.
Manchester United striker Ruud van Nistelrooy has been charged by the FA following the explosive match at Old Trafford yesterday.
Van Nistelrooy: Fouled Ashley Cole. (MichaelSteele/GettyImages)
Holland international van Nistelrooy has been charged with serious foul play following a challenge on Arsenal full-back Ashley Cole during the match which United won 2-0.
Under the FA's new fast-track disciplinary system van Nistelrooy's case will be dealt with on Thursday.
Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger has been asked to explain post-match comments about van Nistelrooy and referee Mike Riley.
soccerbest
Starting XI
I hope Ruud sues the bastard Wenger for repeatedly slandering him. :s***:
Ruud will be banned for a few games, after all the FA always favour those arse err, admittedly it was a bad tackle on cole but its funny the challenge made by arse players on our players goes unpunishned.
Ruud will be banned for a few games, after all the FA always favour those arse err, admittedly it was a bad tackle on cole but its funny the challenge made by arse players on our players goes unpunishned.
soccerbest
Starting XI
I hope Ruud sues the bastard Wenger for repeatedly slandering him. :s***:
Ruud will be banned for a few games, after all the FA always favour those arse err, admittedly it was a bad tackle on cole but its funny the challenge made by arse players on our players goes unpunishned. **** you FA listening to Wenger whinge.
Ruud will be banned for a few games, after all the FA always favour those arse err, admittedly it was a bad tackle on cole but its funny the challenge made by arse players on our players goes unpunishned. **** you FA listening to Wenger whinge.
soccerbest
Starting XI
I hope Ruud sues the bastard Wenger for repeatedly slandering him. :s***:
Ruud will be banned for a few games, after all the FA always favour those arse err, admittedly it was a bad tackle on cole but its funny the challenge made by arse players on our players goes unpunishned. **** you FA listening to Wenger whinge.
Ruud will be banned for a few games, after all the FA always favour those arse err, admittedly it was a bad tackle on cole but its funny the challenge made by arse players on our players goes unpunishned. **** you FA listening to Wenger whinge.
im sorry. am i the only one who thinks cambell fouled rooney? contact was made, no doubts about it, not only that but cambell was in no way playing the ball with his leg up around rooney's waist. rooney played the contact and won a peno. you gonner fans want to ask cambell why his leg was where it was before you ask rooney why he dived.
- Status