Most concise and easy to read 9-11 debunking I've seen

[LaBrujita]

You may be tired of this, or have seen this, or know all of this, but I recommend at least reading a few paragraphs to give the article a chance:
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/holmgren01.htm

I apologize if you are all 9-11ed out; refueling the fires is important, though, considering the election.


If you follow the links around the site, there is much more about what really happened.

http://serendipity.911review.org/wt...ally_happened_2
http://serendipity.911review.org/wot/aa11.html

and so on: http://serendipity.911review.org/wtc.htm

 

[Glorious]

i am sick of it especially here in Australia, our election is being dominated by what America does. we should be worrying about taxes, social security, health education and transport etc not Bush and his texan crusade.

don't get me wrong 3000 odd people dead in one moment is criminal

 

[Elder]

Hey the Jews weren't baked in ovens either. That's one that is being taught all over the Arab world.

We should start a conspiracy theory thread.

 

[Elder]

hahahah, i couldn't help but read a bit.


Little did we all know that a Boeing jet carrying civilian passengers can fire missles!!!

Yes, you heard it here... the first place ot hit the WTC fired a missle at the building before crashing into it. It all makes sense now... really...


hahahahahah.. wait... we are supposed to take this thing seriously with chapters entitled "The USA - Terrorist State" and "Wars for Oil." Yeah, this is an "honest" critique...


Man, why did you post this bull****?

 

[Gerrard 17]

Originally posted by Elder
Little did we all know that a Boeing jet carrying civilian passengers can fire missles!!!

Why don't you read it again.

 

[Gerrard 17]

Originally posted by Elder
Little did we all know that a Boeing jet carrying civilian passengers can fire missles!!!

Yes, you heard it here... the first place ot hit the WTC fired a missle at the building before crashing into it. It all makes sense now... really...

The plane that hit the North Tower was not American Airlines Flight 11. It was not a Boeing 767. It was a custom-built military plane carrying three missiles that created the impression of a plane crash without leaving any wreckage.

Nice try.

 

[rhizome17]

Originally posted by Gerrard 17
Why don't you read it again.

Haha yeah, I can't find the bit about airliners firing missiles COS IT AINT THERE!

 

[xxxFLYERxxx]

Theres a video of the crash though, and it looks like a normal plane to me.

 

[rhizome17]

Originally posted by xxxFLYERxxx
Theres a video of the crash though, and it looks like a normal plane to me.

http://serendipity.911review.org/wot/aa11.html

 

[Rob]

Ask the wifes, husbands who's love ones were on that plane if it was a Boeing when they saw them take off from Boston airport.

Then ask them have they even seen their loved ones again?

The plane that hit the North Tower was not American Airlines Flight 11. It was not a Boeing 767. It was a custom-built military plane carrying three missiles that created the impression of a plane crash without leaving any wreckage. In order for it precisely to strike the correct part of the tower (in line with the bomb already planted in the east wall) it must have been flown remotely using cruise navigation. I believe a similar plane was used to strike the Pentagon.

But awell.

 

[xxxFLYERxxx]

ummm......i cant see anything here.


http://webfairy.911review.org/video/ghostplane2.wmv

this is interesting. you can see something shoot out just before it makes contact with the building. still could be doctored though.

And Rob makes a good point. What happened to all those people? They just boarded some secret military plane without noticing.

 

[Rob]

They are in Argentina. Like when Hitler "killed" himself, no he just spent the last 30years of his life down south.

Think its non sense? It was in the Simpsons.

 

[Rob]

Sorry, one last point. What about the phone calls made to family members on board one of the planes? Oh sorry, they worked for the Bush Admin.

 

[Elder]

Originally posted by rhizome17
Haha yeah, I can't find the bit about airliners firing missiles COS IT AINT THERE!

hahahah, okay.. right. the plane was actually a military plane that could fire missles. NOW I GET IT!!!



Some of you never cease to amaze me. Just admit that Muslim terrorist bastards flew the planes into the buildings for Allah. There was no damn plot. Just stupid people who couldn't put 1 and 1 together to stop the thing.

 

[Elder]

Originally posted by xxxFLYERxxx

ummm......i cant see anything here.


http://webfairy.911review.org/video/ghostplane2.wmv

this is interesting. you can see something shoot out just before it makes contact with the building. still could be doctored though.

And Rob makes a good point. What happened to all those people? They just boarded some secret military plane without noticing.

The thing that "shoots" out is just the contact that planes makes with the outside of the building. In fact, if you look closely enough, you will notice the thing doesn't "shoot" out until after the plane has already entered the building.

There is nothing there.

 

[Elder]

Originally posted by Rob
Sorry, one last point. What about the phone calls made to family members on board one of the planes? Oh sorry, they worked for the Bush Admin.

Don't get them started because one of the victims was married to the Solicitor General of the United States. Ted Olsen... who also argued for Bush in the Supreme Court during the election fiasco. A friend of the Bush Adminstration no doubt... but we all know she was willing to be sacrficed for the greater good don't we?

Oh, she also wrote a book about how evil Hillary Clinton was... I say Hitlary organized the whole thing!!

 

[rhizome17]

Originally posted by Elder
Just admit that Muslim terrorist bastards flew the planes into the buildings for Allah.

What, the ones who weren't on the passenger lists?

 

[Elder]

Originally posted by rhizome17
What, the ones who weren't on the passenger lists?

Oh, does that come from the "study" as well. How you can take that page seriously just baffles me.

 

[rhizome17]

Originally posted by Elder
Oh, does that come from the "study" as well.

Hell no, this info has been around for ages. I am surprised you haven't come across it in your own travels around the web. Believe me, this isn't new information. Even the bbc carried a story about conflicting information regarding the flight attendants phonecall of the seats where they were sitting, and that privided by the FBI.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1556096.stm

Rense has had it for ages

http://www.rense.com/general15/perplexingpuzzle.htm

What Really Happened also has had it for ages

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hijackers.html

More skeptics here

http://home.pacbell.net/skeptica/9-11list.html

Say whatever you like about the sites themselves, I don't really care. But the point is, questions over the 'official' passenger list provided by the FBI and conflicting information has been around for a couple of years now.

 

[Elder]

Originally posted by rhizome17
Hell no, this info has been around for ages. I am surprised you haven't come across it in your own travels around the web. Believe me, this isn't new information. Even the bbc carried a story about conflicting information regarding the flight attendants phonecall of the seats where they were sitting, and that privided by the FBI.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/1556096.stm

Rense has had it for ages

http://www.rense.com/general15/perplexingpuzzle.htm

What Really Happened also has had it for ages

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/hijackers.html

More skeptics here

http://home.pacbell.net/skeptica/9-11list.html

Say whatever you like about the sites themselves, I don't really care. But the point is, questions over the 'official' passenger list provided by the FBI and conflicting information has been around for a couple of years now.

Hmmm.. I never did run across it. So thanks for the links. I just read the BBC link because that is one I could take truthfully. But at the very end of the article it says that the hijiackers weren't in the right seats or something...

The plane wasn't full, so could they have just switched seats? It's not hard, I do it all the time on empty planes.

Anyway, I will have to read through these later. I am writing a paper on Management... boring. This is more fu.