• This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:

    1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.

    2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.

    3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.

    Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.

    Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.

    Thank you!

offside rule

adnan2850

Red Card - CØCKSUCKER [Exp.: Never...Ever!]
Life Ban
FIFA to discuss offisde law change

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/headlinenews?id=321210&cc=5901

LONDON, Jan 7 (Reuters) - A major change to football's offside law is on the agenda when FIFA's law-makers meet in Cardiff next month.
The proposal, from the Football Association of Wales, is that a player can only be offside if they are in the opponent's penalty area.


If accepted by the game's global governing body, the change would have an even bigger impact on the sport than the last major alteration to the offside law in 1925.

That change reduced from three to two the number of players from the defending team needed to be between the attacker with the ball and the goalline in the opponent's half.

It was introduced to end a lack of goals being scored in the game and had a huge impact with far more goals being scored before teams adapted their tactics to deal with it.

The law-making International Board, established in 1886, comprises eight seats; the four British associations and an equal number from FIFA. Any proposal needs at least six votes to become law.

The British have such a large representation in recognition of their role in originally codifying the laws of the game.

The busy agenda for the meeting in Cardiff on February 26 also includes a proposal to change the punishment for a 'professional foul'.

The Welsh are proposing that players be booked rather than sent off for denying an opponent an obvious scoring opportunity but that the attacking team be awarded a penalty, so having the scoring opportunity "returned" to them.

It would also stop matches being spoilt by having so many goalkeepers sent off for these type of offences.

FIFA also want to stop time-wasting and the meeting will discuss yellow cards for attacking players who pick the ball out of the net after a goal is scored and for any player who 'deliberately touches' the ball after a free-kick, corner or throw-in is awarded against his side.

The Board is also expected to look at technological equipment, designed to rule whether the ball has crossed the line for a goal, during their stay in Cardiff.

The trial will be shown to members at the Millennium Stadium where the English League Cup final is being played on February 27 but the technology will not be used in the match.

Any decisions taken by the Board become law the following July 1 but major changes are usually tested in junior and youth level matches for two or three seasons before being integrated into the game at senior or professional level.
 

italianstyle87

Starting XI
i like it as it is now

but the change could be good, in the box there are so many unlucky moments were play occurs to fast for a player to move into a legal position

it also creates another problem, judging whether players are in or out of the box when on the edge
 
V

Virgo

Guest
You misread it

"The proposal, from the Football Association of Wales, is that a player can only be offside if they are in the opponent's penalty area"
 

shez

Youth Team
honestly

man i really hope that football won't be tampered with.... its a great game because of the arguing and close calls....it may be unfair but all the teams are on the same grounds..a crap referee or a bad offside call can happen to both teams... if we try to make the game too perfect like the NFL with all their cameras then what are we gonna argue about?...too much justice isn't that good lol

if Man Utd had a decent striker up front they would have scored 3 goals then this incident won't make us think that much....ppl are afraid of not getting away with their crappy performances..a ref won't take a ball and stick it in your net 5 times every game.....
 
V

Virgo

Guest
don't be so egocentric, no one's talking about Manchester United
 

PhiLLer

Fan Favourite
Just bring the old bloody rule back. Not this whole new thing of not being involved with play, penalty area only and all that other twaddle.
 

henry#14

Starting XI
Originally posted by PhiLLer
Just bring the old bloody rule back. Not this whole new thing of not being involved with play, penalty area only and all that other twaddle.

Exactly.
 

claupastore

Fan Favourite
Re: offside rule

Originally posted by adnan2850

The Welsh are proposing that players be booked rather than sent off for denying an opponent an obvious scoring opportunity but that the attacking team be awarded a penalty, so having the scoring opportunity "returned" to them.

It would also stop matches being spoilt by having so many goalkeepers sent off for these type of offences.

thats sounds good to me, but instead of the yellow, give the bastard the red for being an asshole :)


Originally posted by adnan2850

FIFA also want to stop time-wasting and the meeting will discuss yellow cards for attacking players who pick the ball out of the net after a goal is scored and for any player who 'deliberately touches' the ball after a free-kick, corner or throw-in is awarded against his side.

its about damn time


...and about teh offside rule. its perfect as it is. just get rid of the pasive offside and sh¡t and it´ll be fine.

being offside only in the box would be stupid. a coach could leave a player just wating right there, forcing the other team to also leave the defense there which will make the game worst imo. the defense will be too far away from the midfielders to participate in the game. also, no counter attacks. thats just wrong and stupid
 

Thelonious

Senior Squad
wouldn't it mean defenders would have to stay in the penalty area or just outside it though , otherwise teams could have a striker waiting outside the penalty area and hit a long ball to him.
 

enigma

Starting XI
I think it will probably be the stupidest rule ever if it actually is implemented. It'll be good for teams that use the counter-attack tactic a lot, though.. But still, I think it's quite rubbish.
 
Re: offside rule

The proposal, from the Football Association of Wales, is that a player can only be offside if they are in the opponent's penalty area.

Absolute idiocy. It will lead to players being put around the box and longballs played forward. In essense we'll have half the players in one half and half in the other.

Brilliant wah to butcher the game :rolleyes:

The Welsh are proposing that players be booked rather than sent off for denying an opponent an obvious scoring opportunity but that the attacking team be awarded a penalty, so having the scoring opportunity "returned" to them.

It would also stop matches being spoilt by having so many goalkeepers sent off for these type of offences.

A freekick is taken from where the foul occured. A foul in the penalty area is taken within the penalty area, on the penalty spot. A foul outside the penalty area should take place outside the penalty area.

As much as i can understand the reason this was made, i can't agree with it. Who's going to decide whether it was a clear goalscoring decision? if a goalkeeper runs out and deliberately takes out a player, that is definately a red card offense, and it makes no sense allowing that player to continue. the match is not spoiled any more than with any other red card offense. maybe we should get rid of them too :rolleyes:


FIFA also want to stop time-wasting and the meeting will discuss yellow cards for attacking players who pick the ball out of the net after a goal is scored and for any player who 'deliberately touches' the ball after a free-kick, corner or throw-in is awarded against his side.

In a situation where a team needs two goals, and they score one of these goals late in the game, i see no reason why the striker should be punished if they pick the ball up and sprint back with it to take the kickoff faster. i've seen this happen often, and i cannot see a reason to punish it. how will that stop time-wasting. if anything it will allow a team with a lead to waste MORE time after they concede.

as for the 'deliberate touches' after a freekick/corner/throw in is awarded, i definately agree with that. though it should be worded so that the player is only punished if their touch delays the re-start of play. if a player is going to get it and legitimately retrieve the ball for the player taking the freekick/corner/throw in because it is nearer to him/her, then that player should not be fouled :confused:

The Board is also expected to look at technological equipment, designed to rule whether the ball has crossed the line for a goal, during their stay in Cardiff.
i assume they are talking about the idea of having microchips in the ball like they do in tenis to know when the ball is in.... i can't say i disagree with it, because it won't really intefere with the game :confused:
 

claupastore

Fan Favourite
Re: Re: offside rule

Originally posted by Parra Power
A freekick is taken from where the foul occured. A foul in the penalty area is taken within the penalty area, on the penalty spot. A foul outside the penalty area should take place outside the penalty area.

As much as i can understand the reason this was made, i can't agree with it. Who's going to decide whether it was a clear goalscoring decision? if a goalkeeper runs out and deliberately takes out a player, that is definately a red card offense, and it makes no sense allowing that player to continue. the match is not spoiled any more than with any other red card offense. maybe we should get rid of them too :rolleyes:

well if its a one on one and a defender comes form behind and tackles the attacker (when he was going to have a clear chance to score) then i think its fair to award that player a penalty.

Originally posted by Parra Power
In a situation where a team needs two goals, and they score one of these goals late in the game, i see no reason why the striker should be punished if they pick the ball up and sprint back with it to take the kickoff faster. i've seen this happen often, and i cannot see a reason to punish it. how will that stop time-wasting. if anything it will allow a team with a lead to waste MORE time after they concede.
[/B]

i think they ment to write "if a denfender of the team that recieved the goal" :confused: ...maybe, if not, it makes no sense
 

WilliamFAlmeida

Starting XI
dont mess with the rule....
it got confusing as it is. Leave it like this. Its not like the game is boring or anything. Its not like in the past few years the offsides has really hindered a championship.

I say just call based on the rules. When the pass is made. That is often screwed up by refs, at least once every game I watch, but other than that its not big deal.
 

RonaldinhoBR10

Red Card - Multiple Accounts
Life Ban
ok they better not make this STUPID RULE

if they make it, then it will ruin football

common...can only be offsides inside the area?????wtf????

NO
 


Top