Originally posted by Bummy_JaB
Pennant and money would be a great switch but does City really need the loot ??????
60 million pounds in debt thanks to Kevs policy of buying overpriced, aging midfielders. So yes, we need the loot. ANd then some.
Originally posted by Eng4WorldCup
^ i highly, highly doubt he would actuall go to chelsea. liverpool is more likely, but surely manure and chelski are last resorts (considering ians influence)
You are right about United, he won't be ending up there ever. As for Chelsea, I don't think you can count them out of any transfer, no matter the player. If they offered the money the board would take it straight away and SWP will be playing at Stamford Bridge... especially if Sven encourages the move. Pool is possible but it would all depend on what Gerrard does... they are not exactly challenging for honours without him. Just think, Lampard, Gerrard and SWP playing together at Chelsea, Sven would love it.
Bradley Wright phillips is also looking the goods, if Anelka leaves in the summer then BWP will be proving his worth...
Originally posted by whuahu
how the hell can sven goran erikson (sp?) keep this guy out of the team?
it's absolutely ridiculous.
he's as exciting to watch as ronaldinho gaucho i tell you.
2 words - DAVID BECKHAM. But I think Sven should give SWP a go on the left if he isn't going to put Cole and Bridge on the left. SWP scores goals with both feet, roams all over the show and is comfortable on either flank and in the middle. Heck Sven could let Rooney and SWP play swapsies over the field, it would bamboozle any opposition.
Once Becks is gone though, SWP should be a regular starter, especially if he moves to Chelsea or Arsenal or something.