• This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:

    1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.

    2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.

    3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.

    Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.

    Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.

    Thank you!

PAOK penalised for suspended player

P

Pontiakos

Starting XI
the thing that sucks is the team didn't know this. I mean come on the guy got a red card in the first 5 minutes of that game 4 years ago.

this is just dumb. imo the should take PAOK's goal away but not award it to Macabi.......on aggregate thats 4.5 goals...PAOK must perform a miracle
 
V

Voltaic Borusse

Fan Favourite
Yeah, a fine would have been more appropriate for this kind of situation. This tribulation should act as motivation for PAOK in the next leg, though.
 
B

Brondbyfan

Senior Squad
Man, if all they did was fine them Macabi would have raised such a stink. I think UEFA was on some level saving themselves a lot of grief here.
 
L

Limberopoulos21

Senior Squad
Originally posted by Lonestarr022
i agree the 3-0 is a bit extreme, a fine or something liek that is a more fair decision, or ban the guy for an additional match
Click to expand...

that makes more sense. But this had happened to the opposing team aswell awhile ago, so for now it's fair.

But in the future the best thing to do is prevent the player from playingthe next match. Because UEFA is at fault at this aswell. that is unless if there actually was a list of players who were ineligible to play that Paok didn't check.
 
A

Aveirenses

Banned
Life Ban
Originally posted by Limberopoulos21
that makes more sense. But this had happened to the opposing team aswell awhile ago, so for now it's fair.

But in the future the best thing to do is prevent the player from playingthe next match. Because UEFA is at fault at this aswell. that is unless if there actually was a list of players who were ineligible to play that Paok didn't check.
Click to expand...
How is it UEFA's fault? They aren't responsible for getting the list of suspended players to the teams, it'd take WAY too much time.
 
P

Punkt

Fan Favourite
PAOK communications director Dimitris Giannopoulos resigned after admitting to local media that no one had checked a list of suspended players sent to the club ahead of the first leg.


:rolleyes:
 
M

Mikey

Guest
cases like this, Uefa can often contradict themselves. Russia played with a player that tested possitive for drugs, against wales in a playoff for euro 2004. Only the player was punished. Bad example, if UEFA wanna be gay with all these technical rules, they shouldve made an example out of Russia/Titov and banned them from Euro 2004.
 
P

Punkt

Fan Favourite
Originally posted by Mikey
cases like this, Uefa can often contradict themselves. Russia played with a player that tested possitive for drugs, against wales in a playoff for euro 2004. Only the player was punished. Bad example, if UEFA wanna be gay with all these technical rules, they shouldve made an example out of Russia/Titov and banned them from Euro 2004.
Click to expand...

i don't agree. in a doping case the club/NT can't be punished by an error of 1 player. this case is a club error so the club must be punished.
 
P

Pontiakos

Starting XI
Originally posted by Punkt
i don't agree. in a doping case the club/NT can't be punished by an error of 1 player. this case is a club error so the club must be punished.
Click to expand...

I agree....but not by 4.5 goals on aggregate...take away PAOK's goal....3 goals for Macabi on aggregate. that is fair.
 
M

Mikey

Guest
ya, i see your point. Buts wats more serious, someone taking drugs, or a mistake with paper work?

i cant even imagine wat wouldve happend, had this occured with a big club.
 
P

Punkt

Fan Favourite
Originally posted by Mikey
ya, i see your point. Buts wats more serious, someone taking drugs, or a mistake with paper work?

i cant even imagine wat wouldve happend, had this occured with a big club.
Click to expand...

it's the drugs off course. so the player must be heavily punished, not the team.
 
S

SLB4life

Youth Team
i think it is on POAK because UEFA isnt going to go around and tell every club about that stuff... they have other things to take care of.... the club should have received records of all those things.... so what it was four years ago.... it doesnt matter even if it was 10 years ago.... they should know things like that.... but i agree in some aspect that 3-0 is a bit harsh.... 2-0 would have been enough
 
V

valioso

Fan Favourite
its the rules and is the clubs responsability to keep track of all those stats.. UEFA just applied the rules.. frankly in a big club this wouldnt happen because they keep track of this.
 
F

Fernandez

Team Captain
In my opinion, its the club's fault. Selecting a team involves checking the list of suspended players. It's their mistake and I fully agree with UEFA.
 
T

tam

Club Supporter
Originally posted by Poutsa pali oe oe...:
"Originally posted by Elder---->on why the Palestinians hate the Jews

- Israel founded, war, palestinians kicked out of their "land"...
- More war, arabs lose.
- More war, arabs lose again."

WHAT ARE YOU TRYING TO SAY?!
 
T

tam

Club Supporter
HE HAD PT IT HERE,PUBLICKY,THATS THE ONLY REASON I WENT IN: FOR AN ANSWER. IF HE WASN'T BRINGING IT UT I WOULDN'T HAVE ASKED...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.


Top