• This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:

    1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.

    2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.

    3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.

    Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.

    Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.

    Thank you!

Ranieri admits: It was my fault

henry#14

Starting XI
Claudio Ranieri shouldered the blame as Chelsea suffered a major setback to their Champions League dream in Monaco. The Chelsea boss accepted his share of responsibility for the substitutions which backfired with the semi-final first leg seemingly in his team's hands.

With Monaco reduced to 10 men, and 37 minutes left, the self-confessed 'Tinkerman' replaced right-back Mario Melchiot with a third striker in Jimmy-Floyd Hasselbaink and went for victory.

However, Monaco responded by punishing Chelsea for their adventure on the counter-attack and Fernando Morientes and substitute Shabani Nonda completed a 3-1 first-leg victory.

Ranieri admitted: 'With one player more, we wanted to win the match but we lost the plot in the last 15 minutes.

'The players all wanted to do something but in the wrong way as they ran with the ball rather than playing to our three strikers.

'But I would never fault the players. It's my fault. I accept this as I have been in football for 30 years.

'I made the changes because I was sure it was the best thing for the team.'

Ranieri admitted that Chelsea, for whom Hernan Crespo had equalised a Dado Prso first-half header, now have merely a '20 per cent' chance of reaching the final.

However, he made no comment on allegations of play-acting against Claude Makelele for his part in Andreas Zikos' dismissal.

And he was similarly unforthcoming amid television evidence that could lead to a UEFA investigation of Marcel Desailly for an apparent elbow on Morientes.

'I didn't see what happened,' insisted Ranieri.

'Of course, I don't feel good now but Monaco played well and deserved to win.'

Ranieri's opposite number, Monaco coach Didier Deschamps, described his 10-man side's victory as extraordinary.

Deschamps said his team were spurred by the apparently unfair sending off of midfielder Andreas Zicos in the 52nd minute.

'They reacted with a great effort. It was something extraordinary what they did scoring two goals. Exceptional,' said Deschamps, a former France captain and Chelsea midfielder.

Deschamps, who said Monaco won the tactical battle this time, added he felt Ranieri's 20 per cent odds were too generous.

'He's an astute coach. He knows how to put pressure on his opponents,' Deschamps said with a wry smile.

'I would say we have a 51 per cent advantage.' Deschamps said the return at Stamford Bridge on May 5 would be a completely different style of match.

'But we won't go just to defend. We will be looking for a balance.'


he's certainly a bigger man than I am:o
i would've just blamed Gronjkaer and Gudjonsen(H)

http://soccernet.espn.go.com/headlinenews?id=297786&cc=3436
 

champdave

SG Sheffield Authority
The man's got balls, you admit that. But he didn't admit that Chelsea were played off the park by a team who showed pride and passion at a fraction of the cost. The Monaco players' attitude was outstanding in the match, even after Makelele "did a rivaldo" ;)
 

henry#14

Starting XI
Originally posted by champdave
even after Makelele "did a rivaldo" ;)

what a fucking cheater. and desailly may well get a ban after the match for the elbows. talk about "throw them 'bows"(H)
 

Larry

Fan Favourite
Re: Ranieri admits: It was my fault

Originally posted by henry#14
i would've just blamed Gronjkaer and Gudjonsen(H)

Are you serious? Gronkjaer is so underrated. He is way better than the likes of Duff, Makalele, Veron etc.. He makes great runs down the wing.

Ediur is also a very good player, but i think he is alot better when playing in the premiership because in the UCL Crespo and JF have had alot more international experience
 

Alistair

Starting XI
Re: Re: Ranieri admits: It was my fault

Originally posted by Larry
Are you serious? Gronkjaer is so underrated. He is way better than the likes of Duff, Makalele, Veron etc.. He makes great runs down the wing.

Nah I dislike Gronkjaer, sure he's a good player, but I don't think he's played to his full ability for the team. He has the potential, but I don't think he's using it with the opportunities he's been given..
 

John_Arne_Riise

Senior Squad
Re: Re: Ranieri admits: It was my fault

Originally posted by Larry
Are you serious? Gronkjaer is so underrated. He is way better than the likes of Duff, Makalele, Veron etc.. He makes great runs down the wing.

Gronkjaer gets into good crossing positions but sometimes his deliveries are shocking, i'd much rather Duff in my team who is a greater scoring threat than Gronkjaer.
 

henry#14

Starting XI
Re: Re: Ranieri admits: It was my fault

Originally posted by Larry
Are you serious? Gronkjaer is so underrated. He is way better than the likes of Duff, Makalele, Veron etc.. He makes great runs down the wing.

Ediur is also a very good player, but i think he is alot better when playing in the premiership because in the UCL Crespo and JF have had alot more international experience

i'm talking about the game. these 2 were shocking for most of it:|
i know Gronkjaer is usually a good player, and Gudjonsen, but i meant for THIS match ;)

EDIT: and no way in hell Gronkjaer is better than Duff:o
 

shadowofanubis6

Reserve Team
I dont like ranieri and think he should be gone, BUT... the man showed killer instinct just like deschamps did. The only difference is that it worked for deschamps in the best way. It's not ranieri's fault that ambrosini didn't make that save for the 3rd goal.
 

henry#14

Starting XI
Originally posted by shadowofanubis6
I dont like ranieri and think he should be gone, BUT... the man showed killer instinct just like deschamps did. The only difference is that it worked for deschamps in the best way. It's not ranieri's fault that ambrosini didn't make that save for the 3rd goal.

it was ambrosio ;)

also, wtf was he thinking on the Nonda goal:| he should've used his foot to save it, or at least should've touched it out. taking nothing away from Shabani though great run and goal
 

adj137

Senior Squad
his subs let him down, and he really should have kept Gronkjaer on as he was chelsea most dangerous player imo.
Hassalbaink was annonymous for most of his short spell AND why did he put Veron on whos only played a couple of minutes beforehand, he should have used joe cole
 

garlei

Senior Squad
I think ranieri is trying to take the blame away from the players so they will believe themselves and perform in the next match.
 

SB9Dragon

Fan Favourite
I personally think that Ambrosio isn't that great a GK and I wouldn't be surprised to see him leave this summer. If he stays he will probably be the 3rd GK after Cudicini and Cech....
 

Solo Inter

Reserve Team
I would almost call the 3rd goal a goalkeeping error, but not quite.

He played it slack cause (along with everyone else who was watching and on the pitch) he didn't think Nonda would get to the ball.

If you watch the replay he holds his hands out to let the ball roll in to them, Nonda gets a tough and redirects the ball, keeper should have made him self bigger, put his chest in front if it or got a boot to it.
 

-William-

Starting XI
atleast he accepts his fault, some coach of a team from another galaxy should try to do the same and not have so much pride
 

adj137

Senior Squad
either way it pretty much summed up chelsea day, slack.
especially in the second half, they were letting the ten amn monaco dominate them
 

$teauA

Superstar
Ranieri made the substitution at halftime (Veron for Gronkjaer) that ruined the whole game for Chelsea, there was no need for that move to be made, Chelsea was playing pretty well and at least they were getting some action on the left with Gronkjaer but once Veron came in nothing happened because he cannot play on the left. Just horrible managing from Ranieri :kader:
 

henry#14

Starting XI
Originally posted by adj137
his subs let him down, and he really should have kept Gronkjaer on as he was chelsea most dangerous player imo.
Hassalbaink was annonymous for most of his short spell AND why did he put Veron on whos only played a couple of minutes beforehand, he should have used joe cole

joe cole would've been better. anywayz i reckon Gronkjaer was nowhere near as dangerous as Lampard. Evra did a great job shutting him and Bridge down
 


Top