This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:
1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.
2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.
3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.
Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.
Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.
Thank you!
::shinji::;2249446 said:Well, Americans should definitely care... pretty hard to convince Iraqis that you're bringing democracy and blind justice to their country when you're praising the result of a flawed trial where judges and lawyers are being assasinated.
Anyhow you missed my point, ofcourse he would have been found guilty regardless of the trial circumstances, that's not the issue. What I find concerning is that George W and the rest in favour of the war in Iraq are speaking of the trial/execution as if it were this "great achievment" for the new Iraq, when instead it was just another contribution to the civil war that they're claiming isn't happening either. In normal circumstances it wouldn't matter, but when so much of the American population still beleives that Saddam was involved in 911, manipulation of the truth like that is a big deal.. Trust me, I have no sympathy for the Saddams of the world. It would have saved a lot of trouble and lives if the US soldiers had just shot him in his hiding hole way back when..
The_Knight;2249440 said:Pretty stupid of the Americans to decide the best day to kill him was on the morning of a muslim feast day. Very poor psychological reading. Now everyone will have sympathy for him, hell I had sympathy for him despite the fact he practically ruined our lives one day when we were in Kuwait.
It's like broadcasting on air a controversial execution on Christmas Eve when everyone is one the streets, visiting families and having fun.
Very, very, stupid.
Run DMB;2249456 said:Just to play devil's advocate here... one could argue that the Nuremberg trials were flawed as well, and there was huge skepticism at that time about whether Germany would ever embrace democracy, but things turned out OK. I know it's apples and oranges, but it's a historical example where a shady trial of a nation's tyrannical leaders helped (or at least didn't hurt) that nation's move towards a democratic system.
Vedran-10;2249209 said:I think some of the posts here are sick.
Saddam shouldn't have been executed. It's a mistake to take a life, no matter whose life we're talking about. Watching the Iraqi people on the news celebrating his death by shooting guns in the air and dancing, I can understand it to an extent, because he made their lives miserable, they feel too much hatred towards him to remain civilised and rational. But to see some posts here celebrating an execution... wow. It's primitive to say the least.
And let's just see what has been achieved by this... nothing. Saddam was done with. He had no political power anymore, and the only thing he still could have influenced are terrorist attacks, which we'll have plenty of as a sign of retaliation. By executing him they punished one man and condemned to death many, many more people who'll get killed in the cities of Iraq and all over the world because his followers will do all they can to kill everyone they can.
So, great job.
And the saddest thing is, they never truly beat Saddam. That's a man driven by strong beliefs. Wrong, but beliefs nevertheless. He laughed moments before death, FFS.
Every death penalty is a wrongdoing, and this one even more because sh*t will escalate.
Hasn't it occured to anyone that life imprisonment can be far worse than instant death? For a man like Saddam, who had done countless crimes, death is liberation. This way, he won't have to face responsibility for many other deaths he should have answered for.
And to see all these pictures and games about the hanging shows just how primitive this toilet of a world is.
INFESTA;2249418 said:You know, I agree with 95% of what you're saying. Two years ago, before I realized it wasn't my duty to instruct anyone through an internet forum, I might have written that myself. Even the part I now disagree with.
I can't blame anyone for being happy because a mass-murderer is gone. Even though I'm sure we all had a tough time identifying that old timer with a rope around his neck with the ruthless dictator that once ruled Iraq, I urge you to run down a brief list of his crimes - preferably through a couple documentaries with 1st-person accounts (and there are many) - and then afterwards come here and tell me you aren't happy he's now gone.
Do it! For real! Youtube has plenty of footage from Saddam's era. Just type 'Saddam' + 'Crimes' and watch it, preferably without any food in your stomach.
Even though I'm firmly against death penalty I'm not sorry that man is dead now. And I'd rather be sick than be a hypocrite.
Vagegast;2249438 said:The fact that so many people are complaining about a mass murderer's death is really what's wrong with the world. For those who are opposed to the death penalty out of principality, why do I never see you complaining about the punishment when it was used by Saddam or as it's today used by regimes in Iran and other rogue countries.
The trial was a farce? Sure, but who cares. Do you think a jury of 12 jurors in a fair trial would've found Saddam to be not guilty or only guilty of lesser crimes? Bullsh*t, get over it.
Vedran-10, you're woefully misinformed about the situation in Iraq. You act as if Saddam has a massive following who are loyal to him beyond his grave. Sorry to bring this to you but Saddam's hardcore following is not stronger than a few hundred Sunnis from his hometown's s Bani al-Nasiri tribe. In addition, most of his followers are Arab nationalists. This philosophy used to be big but has been taken over the sick philosophy of Islamic extremism. When a suicide bomb occurs in Iraq, it's not because throngs of Arab nationalists are taking revenge for Saddam's death. Rather it's sectarian violence between Sunnis or Shia's or it's an act of anti-occupation violence. If you think killing Saddam is gonna increase (or reduce) violence, you're incapable of processing what's going on in Iraq.
What have we accomplished with this? Brought a mass-murderer to justice, that's what. Too bad he's actually gonna be one of the very few who'll actually be punished for his actions.
I hope 2007 brings more common sense to SG's population.
meh, apples and oranges. Germany has a democratic tradition dating back to the unfortunately failed Revolution of 1848 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Revolutions_of_1848_in_the_German_states). After WWI when the US didn't give a f*ck about the consequences of the Treaty of Versailles the country was close to a civil war but the Weimar Republic, a democratic system, managed to overcomes those problems for more than a decade. After WWII they just had to reestablish the old parties. Why it worked out better than the first time? They could set up the following equation: democracy=economic wealth.Run DMB;2249456 said:Just to play devil's advocate here... one could argue that the Nuremberg trials were flawed as well, and there was huge skepticism at that time about whether Germany would ever embrace democracy, but things turned out OK. I know it's apples and oranges, but it's a historical example where a shady trial of a nation's tyrannical leaders helped (or at least didn't hurt) that nation's move towards a democratic system.
Vedran-10;2249536 said:I'm opposed to the death penalty.
Wasn't the Weimar Republic ultimately seen as a failure though? That's what I mean when I say that people were skeptical about whether Germany could sustain a democratic system. Up to that point it seemed that Germany made progress whenever they had a strong authoritarian leader (Bismarck, Hitler) and struggled when power was spread out. It seemed like the people needed a strong leader to inspire them to pull themselves out of their misery. Of course, that turned out to be false.Hendrik;2249547 said:meh, apples and oranges. Germany has a democratic tradition dating back to the unfortunately failed Revolution of 1848 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Revolutions_of_1848_in_the_German_states). After WWI when the US didn't give a f*ck about the consequences of the Treaty of Versailles the country was close to a civil war but the Weimar Republic, a democratic system, managed to overcomes those problems for more than a decade. After WWII they just had to reestablish the old parties. Why it worked out better than the first time? They could set up the following equation: democracy=economic wealth.
Virgo;2249533 said:In my opinion the lesser of the two evils would be dividing the country into ethnic zones.
Bobby;2249576 said:North Carolina 4-0 PR China
Azulblanco stuns giants
Minnows North Carolina stunned league giants China 4-0 in 2006 after the Reds were heavily favored by a Fox News poll of experts when the draw was made in Dec. 2005.
Not many would have tipped the azulblanco to make four solid executions, let alone to do so in a year dominated by it's first celebrity trial. The Carolinians caught China early by seeing off Perrie Dyon Simpson. China seemed to be confused by the pace of the former Confederate States of America side as they soon added another, Patrick Lane Moody. China and neutrals alike were incandescent and thought it to be surely offside citing Moody's marginal intelligence but Tar Heel skipper Mike Easley didn't seem to care.
The Old North State's whirlwind first half continued when they added a third goal, this time Willie Brown, Jr. felt an injection of pace. The whistle for half time went soon after, China left the pitch looking completely bamboozled by what had just happened.
North Carolina started the second half as the had ended the first, seeing off Samuel Flippen. China would soon solve it's defense issues but found itself unable to breakdown the stalworth defense which had already ruined the lives of three Americans from the northeast with a false trial.
This victory may mark a turn around for North Carolina who were languishing in the 4th division with no goals between 1962 and 1983.
"We're back up there where we belong" said Momo Gardner, a Greensboro man, "We're as big as Texas or Saudi Arabia."
--- Mecklenburg (NC) Record, 1.1.2007.
INFESTA;2249418 said:Do it! For real! Youtube has plenty of footage from Saddam's era.
Vedran-10;2249536 said:I'm not blaming anyone for being happy, but I am blaming people (non-Iraqi people, some geniuses of these boards) for celebrating it. It's one thing to feel satisfaction, which is normal for any death penalty supporter, but I don't think it should be celebrated, nor do I think people should post drawings of a hanged person.
Vedran-10;2249536 said:It doesn't matter how much death he has caused, because the death penalty should never be used. I guess you missed a question in my first post - didn't it occur to anyone that life imprisonment can be worse than death. He should have been forced to face as many crimes as possible, he should have been forced to stare into the eyes of people whose families he slaughtered. He should have lived through all of that. Not to mention that he should have spent the rest of his natural life locked up in a small cell. Imagine walking into a small room knowing you won't be allowed out for the rest of your life. Now THAT would have been justice.
Vedran-10;2249536 said:In that last paragraph, are you calling me a hypocrite?
The Don't;2249758 said:You just instructed me!
Vedran-10;2249701 said:More like
North Carolina 4 : 10000+ PR China.
That's how many people the Chinese execute per year. Every tenth execution in the world is outside of China. Carolina? Pffft...
Not sure if you've been following the thread from the beginning, because I did say that I'd favour a life imprisonment over executing him any day. But lets try to be a little realistic here, you're free to come and criticize his death sentence and call me a hypocrite all you like, but if he was given a jail sentence instead how long do you think it would be before he 'accidentally' winds up dead one day, after he gets roughed up and tortured by any of those Shia militias running the country. Ever since the Americans dragged his ass out of the spider hole he lived in they did not let him out of their sight or out of their custody for even a single day, because they simply did not have enough confidence in the Iraqi police to not do anything stupid before his trial was over. And anyone who saw what a farce his execution turned out to be, with Muqtada Sadr's goons taunting him while he had the noose tied around his neck, would probably agree that the Americans were justified in feeling that way.smoove said:Bull**** of course. What taste did he get? Death? Good Experience. I guess he's learned his Lesson,now.
And If your'e against the Death Penalty then it has to apply on anyone...otherwise i'd call it double standards.