doublem_59
Club Supporter
Among the largest number of complaints I see throughout the forums are those about missing players, hidden players, missing sponsors on kits, as well as generic team names and badges. The usual speculation is that EA Sports simply did a poor job in creating the game, but the explanation seems to be one of a more legal nature. In that, I mean that the reason is one of either a matter of licensing, or a matter of of avoiding procecution.
The missing or hidden players, and the generic team names and/or badges are most likely due to EA not being able to aquire licensing rights to display certain players, teams and/or team identification in the game. How many of you remember Oliver Kahn suing EA over his name and likeness being in previous editions of the FIFA game, and winning? I don't offhand remember the amount he was awarded, but it seemed to be in the neighborhood of US$ 10 million. If there's any question whatsoever about EA having licensing rights, do you think they would risk another judgement against them like that? The truth is that none of us know what the actual situation is regarding the licensing rights of players like Adrian Mutu, or the various Italian clubs that always seem to be included only some generic way. And don't forget that the KNVD, the Dutch Football Association, never agrees to anything EA apparently offers.
As far as the missing sponsors on kits go, that falls under the matter of avoiding prosecution here in the United States. Middlesborough's main sponsor is 888.com, a gambling website; as is Globet.com, the main sponsor of Spanish club Real Betis, who is also missing from the Real Betis kits in the game. Scottish side Hibernian is also missing their main sponson, the whisky distillery Whyte & Mackay. In the United States, where EA's headquarters are, it is illegal for gambling concerns, hard liquor or cigarette manufacturers to appear in any video games. Even if the FIFA games were marketed only outside the United States, the U.S. Department of Justice, as well as several Attorney Generals from the 50 U.S. States, would gleefully procecute EA for including them in the game, and probably put the company out of business permantly. This is to "protect" children under 18, the main players of video games, if not the main purchacers.
I hope this posting may answer the questions many have on the subjects mentioned in it's title. I'm not stating those are the only reasons, but probably the most likely, especially in light of EA never apparently offering any themselves.
The missing or hidden players, and the generic team names and/or badges are most likely due to EA not being able to aquire licensing rights to display certain players, teams and/or team identification in the game. How many of you remember Oliver Kahn suing EA over his name and likeness being in previous editions of the FIFA game, and winning? I don't offhand remember the amount he was awarded, but it seemed to be in the neighborhood of US$ 10 million. If there's any question whatsoever about EA having licensing rights, do you think they would risk another judgement against them like that? The truth is that none of us know what the actual situation is regarding the licensing rights of players like Adrian Mutu, or the various Italian clubs that always seem to be included only some generic way. And don't forget that the KNVD, the Dutch Football Association, never agrees to anything EA apparently offers.
As far as the missing sponsors on kits go, that falls under the matter of avoiding prosecution here in the United States. Middlesborough's main sponsor is 888.com, a gambling website; as is Globet.com, the main sponsor of Spanish club Real Betis, who is also missing from the Real Betis kits in the game. Scottish side Hibernian is also missing their main sponson, the whisky distillery Whyte & Mackay. In the United States, where EA's headquarters are, it is illegal for gambling concerns, hard liquor or cigarette manufacturers to appear in any video games. Even if the FIFA games were marketed only outside the United States, the U.S. Department of Justice, as well as several Attorney Generals from the 50 U.S. States, would gleefully procecute EA for including them in the game, and probably put the company out of business permantly. This is to "protect" children under 18, the main players of video games, if not the main purchacers.
I hope this posting may answer the questions many have on the subjects mentioned in it's title. I'm not stating those are the only reasons, but probably the most likely, especially in light of EA never apparently offering any themselves.