Brondbyfan
Senior Squad
I think most would agree that the transfer system was one of the major weak points in 2005. The "points" system, versus a monetary system, was unrealistic and unsatisfying. So that is something that needs to be fixed. Relatedly, the pay-off for performance must be solidified. You should get a bucketload of prize money depending on where you finish in the league (and what league you play in), and if you qualify for the CL, you should get the cash.
Loans need to be included. It's ridiculous that Richardson will be on West Brom forever in 2005. Bolton just signed keeper Ali Al-Habsi from Norway, but he won't be arriving until January, and I have a sneaking suspicion EA will forget about this. So they need to mark who is on loan, how long that will last, when they return and who they return to. There should be a system for negotiating loans of young, developing players, and for signing them permanently after a loan.
The CPU must be smarter about transfers. They should not be willing to sell all of their top players and not replace them. In my career I have poached Reyes and Bergkamp's replacement from Arsenal, consequently they got relegated. Teams like Manchester United and Real Madrid will offer to buy the players who are ranked in the 60's that I want to get rid of. Now that's just unrealistic.
Competition between teams should be present, driving up the transfer price. If I'm coaching Portsmouth and am competing with Milan for a player, he should prefer Milan unless I can offer him a hell of a deal.
Relegation and promotion need to be factored into the transfer market. In my career Tottenham got relegated, yet Keane, Defoe, Robinson etc. all stayed on. Preposterous. Furthermore, newly promoted teams don't go on spending sprees to try and stay up.
Even if none of the other suggestions are adopted, there is one thing that simply MUST be implemented: contracts. Players are not slaves to their clubs anymore, and the fact that you get players indefinitely in 2005 makes it incredibly easy to create an unstoppable juggernaut that even Roman Abramovich would envy. My Monaco team is so good after just three years that even Saviola is coming off the bench. Realistically, a player of that caliber would be incredibly unhappy with that role and would demand a transfer. You should have to deal with unhappiness over playing time, homesickness, relegation, and salary in keeping your players on the team.
All of this is a bit complex and will require a lot of work. But frankly, for me the wheeling and dealing in the transfer market is what makes career mode worth playing. 2005 was a big disappointment in this area, and these suggestions would make the career mode much more enjoyable and enduring.
Loans need to be included. It's ridiculous that Richardson will be on West Brom forever in 2005. Bolton just signed keeper Ali Al-Habsi from Norway, but he won't be arriving until January, and I have a sneaking suspicion EA will forget about this. So they need to mark who is on loan, how long that will last, when they return and who they return to. There should be a system for negotiating loans of young, developing players, and for signing them permanently after a loan.
The CPU must be smarter about transfers. They should not be willing to sell all of their top players and not replace them. In my career I have poached Reyes and Bergkamp's replacement from Arsenal, consequently they got relegated. Teams like Manchester United and Real Madrid will offer to buy the players who are ranked in the 60's that I want to get rid of. Now that's just unrealistic.
Competition between teams should be present, driving up the transfer price. If I'm coaching Portsmouth and am competing with Milan for a player, he should prefer Milan unless I can offer him a hell of a deal.
Relegation and promotion need to be factored into the transfer market. In my career Tottenham got relegated, yet Keane, Defoe, Robinson etc. all stayed on. Preposterous. Furthermore, newly promoted teams don't go on spending sprees to try and stay up.
Even if none of the other suggestions are adopted, there is one thing that simply MUST be implemented: contracts. Players are not slaves to their clubs anymore, and the fact that you get players indefinitely in 2005 makes it incredibly easy to create an unstoppable juggernaut that even Roman Abramovich would envy. My Monaco team is so good after just three years that even Saviola is coming off the bench. Realistically, a player of that caliber would be incredibly unhappy with that role and would demand a transfer. You should have to deal with unhappiness over playing time, homesickness, relegation, and salary in keeping your players on the team.
All of this is a bit complex and will require a lot of work. But frankly, for me the wheeling and dealing in the transfer market is what makes career mode worth playing. 2005 was a big disappointment in this area, and these suggestions would make the career mode much more enjoyable and enduring.