137 million is more than twice the 60 million.bigp said:http://www.bigsoccer.com/forum/showpost.php?p=5902301&postcount=497
An estimate of how much Wenger has spent.
This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:
1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.
2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.
3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.
Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.
Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.
Thank you!
137 million is more than twice the 60 million.bigp said:http://www.bigsoccer.com/forum/showpost.php?p=5902301&postcount=497
An estimate of how much Wenger has spent.
But you can't really look at it like that. There teams that could sell players at their peak for a high price and those that sell players after their peak for a lower price. You guys also couldn't spend the money because of the stadium.PaPaGeorGeo said:Its 137 million pounds spent and £106.5 Million made from transfers so in another words hes spend £30.85 million
Which is just over 50 million US and under 60 million US
Wrongogsimon said:its because your threatened.
...againogsimon said:Your boasting will come back to haunt you!!!
Ahh, there it is. My comment was a braindead example of smacktalking. I knew this response would surely be waiting for me eventually, but I went with that nickname anyway. I was just starting to get over Kanu, tooDreath said:"Kanu II"? Kanu was good, even only for one game... I think he scored a hattrick in... what 10 minutes? Can't remember the team it was against though...
Worst example of logic I have ever seen. So essentially transfer income magically negates what you have managed to spend? By the same token, shirt sales from a big name player have to be counted as well, as well as every bit of money pulled into a club? Its not like your revenue from selling someone like Vieira sits in a little jar in Wenger's desk drawer along with the bag of sweets and toys he brings to the park every afternoon. That money gets disseminated into the club for a multitude of purposes. It doesnt just sit there until you decide to buy someone else. Thus how can you regard transfer finances as an entity all on their own?PaPaGeorGeo said:Its 137 million pounds spent and £106.5 Million made from transfers so in another words hes spend £30.85 million
Which is just over 50 million US and under 60 million US
TheBlueBalla said:Worst example of logic I have ever seen. So essentially transfer income magically negates what you have managed to spend? By the same token, shirt sales from a big name player have to be counted as well, as well as every bit of money pulled into a club? Its not like your revenue from selling someone like Vieira sits in a little jar in Wenger's desk drawer along with the bag of sweets and toys he brings to the park every afternoon. That money gets disseminated into the club for a multitude of purposes. It doesnt just sit there until you decide to buy someone else. Thus how can you regard transfer finances as an entity all on their own?
The amount of money you have spent, or that you spend, is completely independent of the amount of money you intake. On anything.
josephd18 said:Judging by your post, nird, I believe you are officially a "Mourinhoist" since you have the same concept of Money=Football.
nird said:how on earth can you make that conclusion by me saying that Chelsea is the best team in england right now?
I think the way Chelsea throws money around is ridiculous, but they do. There is not much I can do about it. And their excellent finances + maurinhoasdiuy has made them the best team in england, and one of the top three teams in the world, wether you like it or not.
Dreath said:You'd have to braindead not to see that Chelsea are the best team in England.
Dreath said:You'd have to braindead not to see that Chelsea are the best team in England.
Frostwolf said:You play too much Championship Manager.
What generally determines a club's transfer budget? The club's overall financal balance.
When you purchase a player, where does the money come from? The club's overall finances.
When you sell a player, where does the money go into? The club's overall finances.
In Wenger's case, he's spent 120M or something of the club's money, and recovered the vast majority of it through selling players (Anelka, Overmars, Petit ). George's wording was a bit off but overall that's what he meant.
But then again, the financial workings of football have no application whatsoever to Chelsea so I forgive your ignorance.