My point is it's very different to rate someone as the best of all time in what they do, rather than best in overall athletic ability. IE. Sports people are athletes, but rating a sports person isn't necessarily rating their athletic ability.jschuck12001;3630338 said:Sportman are referred to as athletes where I come from, maybe in Australia its different.
That said, if you compare their results to their peers, and they're absolutely dominant, the skill of the sport shouldn't matter. If the skill was THAT easy, more would be as good at it. You could argue that someone being absolutely dominant in a simple sport is even harder. There are loads less variables for you to gain in.