a) as Carlos and I explained to you, the british parliamentary system involves electing a party and not an individual, whether the party then changes leader is largely irrelevant in terms of legitimacy. As Carlos explained, the only people who put a cross by the name 'David Cameron' in 2015 are the citizens of his constituency, electing him as their MP, just as the citizens in May's constituency did for her.
b) like her or not, it is clever politics on May's behalf (and also amazing that she managed to keep it such a surprise in this era of leaks). As I already said, in Britain we vote for a party, not an individual, and we give that party a mandate based on their manifesto. May must have felt that because of the debates over brexit, it was not longer tenable to govern under the old mandate and is seeking a new one FOR THE PARTY. it's amusing that like many supposed feminist men Robbie can't stand it when a woman actually gains power and has to question her legitimacy.
c) I think it was reasonable for Cameron to step down - how could he lead the negotiations for a brexit he so heavily opposed? The fact that Europe couldn't concede just the little bit more in those renegotiations you mention when it would have made all the difference is further evidence that they are complicit in the brexit decision.
d) your last point about leavers "bottling" it shows as much ignorance as the rest of your statements. what they are guilty of is ruthlessness, not cowardice. A tiny bit of research would show you that Gove DID stand for the leadership (alongside another brexiteer Leadsom) and they lost, and all evidence shows Johnson bitterly wanted to stand but stood aside so as not to divide the 'out' tory vote. the only problem was that gove was the less popular man and, but his egotism and selfishness clouded his judgement.
Robbie is what happens when someone informs himself and tskes his opinions solely via links which pop up on his europhile Facebook news feed.
Sent from my SM-J120FN using Tapatalk
