Yossarian;2433722 said:
So, is the BIG EAST the best conference again this year just by it's sheer size? The PAC is making a strong case for having 5-7 legit bids for the tourney this year, but the Big East is stacked one through fourteen (USF, Rugrats...they should be the doormats), man.
Yeah, I assumed it was the Pac 10 just because I've been asked if it's better than the ACC this year and I thought it was. However I didn't even consider the Big East. Okay, let's compare...
Pac 10: UCLA, USC, Wazzou, Arizona, Oregon, Stanford, Washington, and Cal have a shot at bids.
UCLA and USC are elite. Wazzou, and probably Arizona and Oregon are in the next group (like 8-18ish), and Stanford, Washington, and Cal all have shots at bids. I'd take Washington over the others just because of coach Romar, and Stanford is going to lose some easier non-conference games because I think they're missing a Lopez brother until the second semester.
Big East: Georgetown, Louisville, Marquette, Syracuse, UConn, Villanova, West Virginia, Pitt, and Notre Dame are all potential NCAA teams, and I would be shocked to see any of them miss out (well, I don't like Nova, but a lot of people seem to). Georgetown is the only elite team in my opinion. Louisville, Marquette, and Syracuse are in that 8-18 range for me. Cuse is unranked in the preseason, and that's a total crime, they return a great team and add Donte Green. Let's just say a backcourt of Devendorf, Harris, and Green should be pretty unstoppable and I can't see how their front court would be much worse than Marquette's. UConn is coming off a terrible year, but they were all sophomores and freshman last season and they'll have a year of experience, plus Jim Calhoun is one of the best coaches out there. There's no way they miss the Tournament, and they should probably be ranked somewhere in the top 25. West Virginia won 25 games last year, returned just about everybody, and they arguably got a coaching upgrade in Bob Huggins over Jim Beilein. Not ranked. I don't like Pitt, don't like Nova, but ND is probably underrated.
So I think they're probably just about even, but the Pac 10 will play more exciting basketball. The Big East also has more bad teams, so the 9 teams above can pad their conference records to get into the Tournament.
EDIT: Here's how I see it right now (yes, this does take into account MSU and OSU's preseason losses, and Kentucky's loss to Garner-Webb last night)
1.Memphis
2.North Carolina
3.Kansas
4.UCLA
5.Georgetown
6.USC
7.Indiana
8.Tennessee
9.Washington State
10.Kansas State
11.Louisville
12.Marquette
13.Arizona
14.Gonzaga
15.Duke
16.Syracuse
17.Oregon
18.Michigan State
19.Ohio State
20.Texas A&M
21.Texas
22.Mississippi State
23.Virginia
24.UConn
25.Southern Illinois
Hey Alex, I had forgotten that Michael Beasley initially committed to Charlotte. Thoughts?