-
This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:
1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.
2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.
3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.
Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.
Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.
Thank you!
Do Mandieta6 and Yoyo really annoy you?
- Thread starter Alex
- Start date
Theodorakis
Banned
sepak does not exist;3484389 said:
can I just ask, are you ok with a mod editing your nickname and signature without your knowledge, to a shape that you surely won't be pleased?
a. Yes, I was making a joke for people who I know who find this funny (unless I misconstrued him immensly, he-who-does-not-exist is one of them)
b. It is funny, even if it might not be funny to you, because I find it funny, be it an abuse of power or not. Whether others find it funny is just a bonus.
c. It's 1984 reference that sepak embarced and so we have jumped on to it
d. If you had a sense of humor you'd have smiled for a moment and let it go, had you done so, you would have had all your stats returned to normal shortly (as will happen with he-who-does-not-exist).
EDIT: he-who-does-not-exist would have had to enable his own signature, you know. If he had existed in the first place to be able to do such a thing, of course.
b. It is funny, even if it might not be funny to you, because I find it funny, be it an abuse of power or not. Whether others find it funny is just a bonus.
c. It's 1984 reference that sepak embarced and so we have jumped on to it
d. If you had a sense of humor you'd have smiled for a moment and let it go, had you done so, you would have had all your stats returned to normal shortly (as will happen with he-who-does-not-exist).
EDIT: he-who-does-not-exist would have had to enable his own signature, you know. If he had existed in the first place to be able to do such a thing, of course.
Theodorakis
Banned
Mandieta6;3484392 said:
so I wouldn't have had all my stats returned to normal shortly cos I have not let that go.
I would have surely let that go if you let me change your nickname and signature any time, for as long as I like and want..
your modshipment hasn't been given to you because you're special.. it hasn't been given to you to fool around and change people's nicknames against their will.. if you don't understand the responsibility it gives to you, leave it..
Theodorakis
Banned
sepak does not exist;3484393 said:
good. I haven't threatened to kill him.. I have no contact whatsoever with him..
and you still think it's normal, check the link below. it's treatable.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome
Theodorakis
Banned
Mandieta6;3484419 said:
I have better ways to calm myself down, if I ever need.
whatever let's leave it there. I have nothing to discuss with you. let's see the people who owns and runs this place think about this.
Theodorakis
Banned
Ha.
now he has repped me 4 times in a row, draining my rep points to something like -300 with the message "no sense of of humour".
so ineffective way to hurt someone, with such powers.
now he has repped me 4 times in a row, draining my rep points to something like -300 with the message "no sense of of humour".
so ineffective way to hurt someone, with such powers.
Theodorakis
Banned
chygry;3484468 said:
ah don't play the who cares about the rep thing card.
if he didn't care about it, he wouldn't get to do it at first place.
besides, of course I'm pissed off. my account and my nickname is not his personal playground to amuse himself. he just can't change things about myself without my permission and tell me to take it lightly and move the fuck on. and when he said people find it funny, that's just him digging himself a bigger hole.
Theodorakis
Banned
sepak does not exist;3484471 said:
we should switch our nicknames.
Assuming that was me, it wouldn't be an abuse of power. Mostly because it's not power. Seeing it as power is lame. As lame as caring about it and complaining about it (and were I to do it, I'd do it because I'd know you'd be pissed, which is lame).
I'd understand if he-who-does-not-exist were upset, I mean, were he to exist he'd be quite new, and young, and rep might mean something to such a person. But you have been for years, you have received lots of negative rep in your time. You are a grown ass man, dude. You run a business, you might be married. Get your shit together, so your name got changed on a website, who cares? Calm down, d'you know how many people have had that happen to them here? A lot (Sir_Didier_Drogba, Andrei, he-who-does-not-exist, Skip, Shifty, Nady, Xifio (who took it better than you have) and lots of others).
Besides, this all started when you got a silly user-title change as a joke and decided to challenge me. This was my reply. You're being a little pussy, grow up.
I'd understand if he-who-does-not-exist were upset, I mean, were he to exist he'd be quite new, and young, and rep might mean something to such a person. But you have been for years, you have received lots of negative rep in your time. You are a grown ass man, dude. You run a business, you might be married. Get your shit together, so your name got changed on a website, who cares? Calm down, d'you know how many people have had that happen to them here? A lot (Sir_Didier_Drogba, Andrei, he-who-does-not-exist, Skip, Shifty, Nady, Xifio (who took it better than you have) and lots of others).
Besides, this all started when you got a silly user-title change as a joke and decided to challenge me. This was my reply. You're being a little pussy, grow up.
Theodorakis
Banned
1- if a normal user tries to give reputation points repeatedly to a same person, it says "you must spread the rep before giving rep points to same user again"... not so in admins.. so yes, it's an abuse of powers.. and I'm not pissed because of being negged, it isn't the first time, but a moderator abusing his powers on me is the first time. make sure you understand this.
2- your second paragraph is arguable; you have named people that had taken it lightly. I have not witnessed how these were occured, maybe in some other circumstance I might take it lightly yes, but I'm not Sir_Didier_Drogba, not andrei, not sepak, not anyone you have written down there.. so you can't ask me to behave the way they did can you?
3- and.. you changed my title, so technically you challenged me first. I thought I took that lightly cos I didn't care, I did not insult you, not attacked you, not changed your nickname. then you infracted me in a way I did not understand. it didn't bothered me either because it meant nothing, but you changing my nickname was the thin red line for me.
if you feel being challenged offensive, you have no right telling people to take things lightly
2- your second paragraph is arguable; you have named people that had taken it lightly. I have not witnessed how these were occured, maybe in some other circumstance I might take it lightly yes, but I'm not Sir_Didier_Drogba, not andrei, not sepak, not anyone you have written down there.. so you can't ask me to behave the way they did can you?
3- and.. you changed my title, so technically you challenged me first. I thought I took that lightly cos I didn't care, I did not insult you, not attacked you, not changed your nickname. then you infracted me in a way I did not understand. it didn't bothered me either because it meant nothing, but you changing my nickname was the thin red line for me.
if you feel being challenged offensive, you have no right telling people to take things lightly
I changed your usertitle, you told me to card you, I did. Then you bumped this thread, I took it as a challenge and acted accordingly. I cannot expect you to react as other people do, you are obviously not the same as them. I mean this in the absolute worst way possible. Nevertheless, I can pass judgement on your behavior, which is what I'm doing.
You are taking this way too seriously, but that's your right.
You are taking this way too seriously, but that's your right.