• This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:

    1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.

    2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.

    3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.

    Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.

    Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.

    Thank you!

England could lose Champions League spot

d3adly

Senior Squad
English clubs would face losing a Champions League spot if Michel Platini wins the race to become president of UEFA.


The three-times former European footballer of the year, who is challenging the present incumbent, Lennart Johansson, to become the next UEFA president, believes no country should have more than three representatives in Europe's premier club competition.


"Four clubs are too many," said Platini today at the launch of his media campaign to become the next leader of European football after years at the top table of both UEFA and FIFA.

"For everybody -- for the country itself, the fans and for the TV rights. Three should be the absolute limit.

"I am not so stupid as to want to change the current format but there are not enough national champions in the last 32 of the tournament and that cannot be right."

England, Spain and Italy all have four clubs in the Champions League under the current rules.

Platini, 51, who had a glittering playing career, is the only candidate who has so far come forward to oppose Johansson, the 76-year-old Swede who has held the post since 1990 and is bidding to stand for a fourth and final time when the election among UEFA's 52 national federations takes place in January.

Kicking off his campaign trail in London -- he will visit four other countries over the next fortnight -- Platini said he intends to become more of an executive president, with additional power to make crucial decisions, and that he already has considerable backing.

Taking a veiled swipe at Johansson's decision to run again, Platini said: "I like Lennart Johansson. He's a very courageous guy but those who are pushing him are not so courageous.

"He told me two years ago he was retiring yet he came back to fight against me. I don't know why. I believe many federations would like him to withdraw rather than see him lose because he's a decent man and that would be very sad."

Outlining his vision for the future of football, Platini said that freedom of movement had got out of hand and that UEFA was far too compliant with the European Union which, he said, was wielding too much power.

He said he would introduce a European football charter to stop the game's warring factions from squabbling and try to create fresh unity.

Platini also denounced the practise of young players being sold on for monstrously fat fees -- only then to be surplus to requirements.

"We have to fight for youth players," said Platini.

"If a club develops a player between the age of 12 and 18 and another club then buys him, he has to carry on playing. Players are developed to play, not to be sold."

Although regarded as being too much of a visionary by some of his critics, Platini has been personally responsible for several crucial innovations that are now part and parcel of the game, most importantly the backpass rule.

If elected UEFA president, he said he would try to introduce four linesmen in professional football to replace the present two.

"We have to help referees who can't see everything and I believe two more assistants on either side of the pitch would do this," he said. "It would help judging offside decisions as well as a range of off-the-ball incidents."

But he said he would never embrace video evidence -- apart from goal-line technology, that is.

"I am totally against refereeing by video,'' Platini said.

"Where would it stop? If you start with videos, you will finish with videos and there would be no more referees."

He also said he supported automatic relegation for clubs who are unable to pay their debts, no matter how powerful they are.

"It can't be right that some countries get relegated for being heavily in debt while others can go on and win the Champions League."

source: soccernet
 

ShearerM4

Fan Favourite
yes saw this on the BBC site. The title is a little misleading though. Kind of adequate for an english website, not so much an international community.

Would be a shame, Platini is always going on about how only national champs should be winning the C1, but I think the current format is the ideal counterweight to keep all the people wanting some euroleague at bay.
 

pede54

Team Captain
Platini is Sepp Blatter's bitch. If he gets in, Blatter will more or less run UEFA too. Thats something that Blatter has been trying to do for more than 10 years. Bad move if Platini suceeds.

Lennart Johansson is an old fart, but he and Blatter despise each other so that has to be a plus to Johansson.
 

yoyo913

Team Captain
I like this idea

its good for the future of football, just like we've seen countries seperate with poverty from 3rd world countries to developed ones we are seeing the same thing with football, the elite nations just keep on getting better

this will distribute money more evenly (Y)

atleast he has the ball to say this before he gets elected and not once he is in power
 

Daz

Everyone's Favourite Diabetic
what if one linesman one side says one thing and the linesman the other side says another? having two linesmen on each side is just going to double the amount of wrong calls made on offsides.
 

Drvar

Starting XI
will someone please edit the title to "CL spots to be limited at 3 per country" or something like that.
otherwise, i dont give a **** about this news, it just bothers me esthetically :D.
 

dipset

Reserve Team
I dont agree, 3 spots is too little, underdogs aklways get 4rth spot, if theirs 3 spot it'll always be the same teams , which is stupid, UEFA C.L has good format, hopefully he doesnt win. so wat does that mean 4 and 5 will go to the UEFA Cup, mmm i dunno , i think he wants to balance Uefa Cup and C.l more evenly so both are prestigous prizes, so teams like Middlesborough dont make the finals more like Arsenal and like Athletico Madrid or something

Regarding linesmen, Quality not Quantity.
 

~Cahill~

Club Supporter
I ceratinly like the idea of four Linesmen. :shades:
Compared to other major football type sports (i.e; League) the quality
of Refrees in international and major domestic Soccer leagues is rather poor.
So anything that makes it better (without using cameras) is welcome by me.

Honestly, I'm suprised at how poor the quality of Referees are in Soccer.
Union and League Referees are way ahead of them, and it should be the other
way around given how much bigger Football/Soccer is.

As for freeing up four spots for other leagues - I'm on the fence with this one.
 

Thelonious

Senior Squad
~Cahill~ said:
Honestly, I'm suprised at how poor the quality of Referees are in Soccer.
Union and League Referees are way ahead of them, and it should be the other
way around given how much bigger Football/Soccer is.

Totally disagree there , refereeing in league and union is pretty inconsistant, Melbourne were robbed in the grand final , and in Union every ref seems to have different interpretations of the rules.

I think 3 teams isn't a bad idea , one out of the four teams often struggles , so I don't think too much will be lost, hopefully the competition won't be completley dominated by teams from the big leagues.
 

d3adly

Senior Squad
Thelonious said:
hopefully the competition won't be completley dominated by teams from the big leagues.

it is more likely that CL will be dominated by teams from the big leagues.
 

Bobby

The Legend
The big leagues will still dominate, this just eliminates the weakest team from each of those nations. It also ads a good team to the UEFA cup to beat up on those little teams.
 

$teauA

Superstar
I agree, 4 spots is way too much. Why the hell is the competition even called the Champions League anymore? That doesn't even make sense. Obviously it would be dumb to go on and change the brand now but limiting each country to a maximum of 3 teams would balance the West and the East of Europe a little more and make for even better competition. Also the 4 linesmen idea is brilliant, never ever thought of that before (Y). Like someone mentioned "what if they one says offside and the other doesnt" no problem, they just discuss it for a minute and come to a conclusion which will most likely be the right one. Linesmen these days don't have a choice, if they lift the flag, it's up and there's nothing they can do about it anymore.

I hope Platini wins (Y)
 

Hendrik

Team Captain
Well the EPL is the only league represented by four teams at the moment. That could be the intention behind it.


$teauA said:
Why the hell is the competition even called the Champions League anymore? That doesn't even make sense.
It's a compromise between the interests of the G14 and Uefa. If they didn't change the system of the CL in the 90s we would have a European Superleague by now without Uefa being part of it.


Obviously it would be dumb to go on and change the brand now but limiting each country to a maximum of 3 teams would balance the West and the East of Europe a little more and make for even better competition.
It would make things more boring. From the 6 Eastern European teams 5 of them are the whooping boys of their group. CSKA were the only side that could beat a team from the West.

Like someone mentioned "what if they one says offside and the other doesnt" no problem, they just discuss it for a minute and come to a conclusion which will most likely be the right one.
What if they don't come to a conclusion? It would only be a waste of time.
 


Top