• This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:

    1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.

    2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.

    3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.

    Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.

    Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.

    Thank you!

FFA Rejects Time Change

Fernandez

Team Captain
Uruguay may have got its way in changing the match officials - from an all-Belgium quartet to a Spanish foursome - for the Sydney game but it now appears as though Australia will have the upper-hand before game two with an extra day to prepare.

it's on the front page
 

Rob

Mourinho’s Assistant
Ruben Sosa said:
The original time was 4:20pm, five hours earlier.



Arguement? I want us to play at 9pm. Read the whole posts, not only the bits you don't like.
Do you read at all? They now want a compromise at 7pm instead of 9pm because the first change was used so we couldn’t get a flight out of South America, however we arranged one with the worlds no1 airline in QANTAS. Uruguay however have been unable to arrange a flight out themselves and have to fly commercially, the first flight being the morning after the game, while Australia flies an hour after. These are the reasons for the change, and I will sum it all up.

- Uruguay change time to 9pm to ruin Australia’s flight plans
- Australia manage to get a chartered flight 1 hour after the end of the game
- Uruguay unable to get a flight themselves, have to fly commercial the morning after, massive advantage to Australia and Uruguay’s first request backfires
- Uruguay ask FIFA, who give FFA the right to accept or deny request
- FFA, being the “dirty” organization they are, NOW are going to give Uruguay a compromise for a 7pm kick off to allow them to catch a flight.

Ruben Sosa said:
Yes, it was a disgrace. We apologized immediately. There's really nothing else we can do about it now. Should we stereotype the whole country for the action of approximately two dozen people?

I find it sad that what happened is constantly brought up, even when it has nothing to do with what anyone is discussing.
No one is stereotyping anything. A stereotype thing to say would be that all Uruguayans spit at Australians, but that hasn’t been said anywhere. Not in our media, not by myself or others. Everyone realises their are idiots, god I got hit by a coin at a game a few nights ago, doesn’t mean the entire terrace throw coins does it?

Ruben Sosa said:
We play at night. If any of you would actually bother to check you'd find that's how we've been playing for the past year.
If you would bother read, you would know that the time was 5pm at the start, Uruguay wanted to change that to 9pm to screw up our plans we had its believed. It was changed to 9pm and now Uruguay want it back to 5pm, despite Australia making arrangements.

It is now believed that in our good natured ways, and not our dirty ways described by Raikkonen where he said we are trying to do everything to annoy Uruguay. However when we ask for a time switch to throw off our opponents plans, and then gets that and that particular switch to be removed because it backfired, and when we ask for a change of refs, then we can be considered to be doing everything to annoy our opponents.

Ruben Sosa said:
Did we actually ask for a ref change? I've found nothing in our websites about it...

I know Fossati didn't like that one of the refs was from a neighboring country to Hiddink. I'm fairly certain Australia wouldn't have liked an Argentinean ref either.
Yea, it has gone from 4 Belgium refs which Uruguay thought was unfair because Guus Hiddink was dutch. :rolleyes: Now its 4 Spanish refs :rolleyes: Complaining now?
 

kangle4

Reserve Team
uruguay deserves this as they changed the first time so australia couldnt get their flight back and now it has backfired on them.

i think we will lose to uruguay but a country that especially comes out just to spit on another countries players doesnt deserve anything as it is filthy and bad sportsmanship.

also why say **** australians we have only done what you did to us in the first place u racist prick.
 

Ruben Sosa

El Jovato
I was well aware of all the time changes, Rob. If you want to believe the reason the time was changed was a scheme to screw you over that backfired then you're welcome to it.

The shift to 9pm was done because we like to play our home game at night (4/5pm is not night, at least not here) and had arranged a charter to take us to Australia directly after the game.

If pushing back the kick-off actually interfered with your flight arrangements it was probably considered a bonus to the AUF due to you not accepting the date change of the first game.

But our flight arrangements fell through, so the AUF wants the game back at the originally scheduled time. I still want it at 9pm, regardless of having to wait until the next morning to get a flight.

I don't see anything complicated about what I've written that could have led you to brief me on what's been happening.

I was unaware of the 7pm compromise you mentioned though. I can't find anything on any of our news websites about it. Do you have a link?

Rob said:
No one is stereotyping anything. A stereotype thing to say would be that all Uruguayans spit at Australians, but that hasn’t been said anywhere. Not in our media, not by myself or others. Everyone realises their are idiots, god I got hit by a coin at a game a few nights ago, doesn’t mean the entire terrace throw coins does it??

Do you read what other Australians write?

I'm not saying you, or every Australian does it, but several here in SG do. There hasn't been a single thread for the past four years about the World Cup mentioning Uruguay that doesn't have an Australian raving about what happened in 2001.

It happened. It was bad. Worse things have happened, both here and elsewhere. Those who continually speak of it should just get over it and move on.

Rob said:
Yea, it has gone from 4 Belgium refs which Uruguay thought was unfair because Guus Hiddink was dutch. :rolleyes: Now its 4 Spanish refs :rolleyes: Complaining now?

Yes. I'd of preferred English and Italian refs. :rolleyes:

#1 Stunna said:
Rob... remember the name of Vicente Sanchez. (H) (6)

Why should he? You know he's not even going to play.
 

Gareth

Starting XI
The whole referee argument makes me laugh, whether or not it was requested, the Uru coach did mention he didn't like the fact that there was a Belgian referee for the 2nd leg, and felt it was a country too close to Holland, Hiddink's home country. That said the coach musn't be up on current world events, the ref for the 1st leg is Danish, forgetting the future queen of Denmark is Australian.
 

Gareth

Starting XI
Ruben, by the way, the pitch against Argentina was water-logged, yet it hadn't rained in over 2-weeks... poor drainage? No chance...

Dirty. Cheating. Bastards.
 

pasion1

Senior Squad
Well after reading all these arguments I've realized 1 thing.

1) PG, it's no secret that Rob is a moron. (How many posts did it take for him to finally understand your argument...like 6?). Just ignore him. He'll go to sleep under his own hate.

2) It's funny how some aussies come out here to mention about the "Spitting" incident (which was apologyzed for like 4 years ago and is old news) but then some come (after saying that they wont mention it anymore) to say "A nation that spits at another's doesn't deserve to go to the WC"

Funny thing is that Hiddink (who wasnt even aware of most of the FFA's insults towards Uruguay) said on the Argentina press 2 days ago "Well They're (Australia) not really used to this stuff in football. The rough stadiums, spitting.......it's normal all over the world for a few people to lose control *laughs* (actually laughs)....completely normal. As long as they have respect as we will do, everything will be fine. It's a football game, not a war"

And it's funny that Hiddink called us cheaters last week.......a man being investigated for Tax Fraud! (before taking it back this morning)

Good call on that one guys.

And Rob is so delusional its not even funny anymore.
This is what happened with the plane story.
1) Uruguay changed time to late
2) Aussies agree
3) Uruguay cant get flight as they thought and want to change back
4) Assies say "screw you" and laugh cause they think it's ironic or something.
5) Uruguay simply goes to FIFA who easily changes the time again
6) Australia bitch and cry about it saying it's not fair.
7) Australia say "How bout 7PM then?"

(Thing is 7PM suits Uruguay fine <they can still catch the plane which lifts like at night). Meaning Uruguay got what they wanted.

Listen we all know that you blame the "spitting guys" for losing 3-0 last year (in a game where the first have could have ended 5 or 6-0 and no one would have said anything about it). But why dont you actually concentrate on the game......rather than trying to justify your hate that you lost the last time.

You wanna know the difference between Uruguay and Australia? I'd still think Uruguay would win if the game was 1 deciding game held at Sydney. Even if something were to go wrong (a failed rebound shot that caused Aussies to score and defend 11 back for the win).......Id be calm that we still have a good chance of actually winning (let alone tieing) over there.

(And I hope Vicente Sanchez plays :p )

Rob please respond I want to see what you write (Ill bring pop corn....I cant wait) :D :)
 

italianstyle87

Starting XI
pasion1 said:
1) PG, it's no secret that Rob is a moron. (How many posts did it take for him to finally understand your argument...like 6?). Just ignore him. He'll go to sleep under his own hate.
if you're referring to his (ruben sosas's) argument, "we play at night" now the game might be played at 5pm, the exact time he was complaining about, saying it was not "night"
http://www2.sbs.com.au/home/index.php3?id=65194

pasion1 said:
2) It's funny how some aussies come out here to mention about the "Spitting" incident (which was apologyzed for like 4 years ago and is old news) but then some come (after saying that they wont mention it anymore) to say "A nation that spits at another's doesn't deserve to go to the WC"

Funny thing is that Hiddink (who wasnt even aware of most of the FFA's insults towards Uruguay) said on the Argentina press 2 days ago "Well They're (Australia) not really used to this stuff in football. The rough stadiums, spitting.......it's normal all over the world for a few people to lose control *laughs* (actually laughs)....completely normal. As long as they have respect as we will do, everything will be fine. It's a football game, not a war"

And it's funny that Hiddink called us cheaters last week.......a man being investigated for Tax Fraud! (before taking it back this morning)
Good call on that one guys.
there is not evidence to suggest hiddink is even linked to the investigation into the tax firm he uses, it's all speculation at the moment

pasion1 said:
And Rob is so delusional its not even funny anymore.
This is what happened with the plane story.
1) Uruguay changed time to late
2) Aussies agree
3) Uruguay cant get flight as they thought and want to change back
4) Assies say "screw you" and laugh cause they think it's ironic or something.
5) Uruguay simply goes to FIFA who easily changes the time again
6) Australia bitch and cry about it saying it's not fair.
7) Australia say "How bout 7PM then?"

(Thing is 7PM suits Uruguay fine <they can still catch the plane which lifts like at night). Meaning Uruguay got what they wanted.
YOU GUYS SUCK, read this article, then please stop believing that uruguay are the victims in all this
http://www4.sbs.com.au/home/index.php3?id=65199
i'll even pick out important sections for you

"After a week of political and logistical posturing by Uruguay featuring complaints over referees, battles over kick-off times and one-upmanship over charter flights"

Already the Uruguayans had shifted the kickoff time for the first leg in Montevideo from 4pm on Saturday local time to 9pm local time after booking a charter flight convinced the Socceroos would not be able to do so themselves.

That backfiredwhen the Socceroos organised a charter plane and Uruguay's fell through, with Uruguay then trying to shift the kickoff forward again to 5pm to service their own needs and football's world governing body FIFA being hauled in to arrange a compromise.


pasion1 said:
Listen we all know that you blame the "spitting guys" for losing 3-0 last year (in a game where the first have could have ended 5 or 6-0 and no one would have said anything about it). But why dont you actually concentrate on the game......rather than trying to justify your hate that you lost the last time.
you loved one the end result of "the spitting incident" was, and you'd love if it happened again
 

Rob

Mourinho’s Assistant
pasion1 said:
Well after reading all these arguments I've realized 1 thing.

1) PG, it's no secret that Rob is a moron. (How many posts did it take for him to finally understand your argument...like 6?). Just ignore him. He'll go to sleep under his own hate.

2) It's funny how some aussies come out here to mention about the "Spitting" incident (which was apologyzed for like 4 years ago and is old news) but then some come (after saying that they wont mention it anymore) to say "A nation that spits at another's doesn't deserve to go to the WC"

Funny thing is that Hiddink (who wasnt even aware of most of the FFA's insults towards Uruguay) said on the Argentina press 2 days ago "Well They're (Australia) not really used to this stuff in football. The rough stadiums, spitting.......it's normal all over the world for a few people to lose control *laughs* (actually laughs)....completely normal. As long as they have respect as we will do, everything will be fine. It's a football game, not a war"

And it's funny that Hiddink called us cheaters last week.......a man being investigated for Tax Fraud! (before taking it back this morning)

Good call on that one guys.

And Rob is so delusional its not even funny anymore.
This is what happened with the plane story.
1) Uruguay changed time to late
2) Aussies agree
3) Uruguay cant get flight as they thought and want to change back
4) Assies say "screw you" and laugh cause they think it's ironic or something.
5) Uruguay simply goes to FIFA who easily changes the time again
6) Australia bitch and cry about it saying it's not fair.
7) Australia say "How bout 7PM then?"

(Thing is 7PM suits Uruguay fine <they can still catch the plane which lifts like at night). Meaning Uruguay got what they wanted.

Listen we all know that you blame the "spitting guys" for losing 3-0 last year (in a game where the first have could have ended 5 or 6-0 and no one would have said anything about it). But why dont you actually concentrate on the game......rather than trying to justify your hate that you lost the last time.

You wanna know the difference between Uruguay and Australia? I'd still think Uruguay would win if the game was 1 deciding game held at Sydney. Even if something were to go wrong (a failed rebound shot that caused Aussies to score and defend 11 back for the win).......Id be calm that we still have a good chance of actually winning (let alone tieing) over there.

(And I hope Vicente Sanchez plays :p )

Rob please respond I want to see what you write (Ill bring pop corn....I cant wait) :D :)

italianstyle87 said:
if you're referring to his (ruben sosas's) argument, "we play at night" now the game might be played at 5pm, the exact time he was complaining about, saying it was not "night"
http://www2.sbs.com.au/home/index.php3?id=65194


there is not evidence to suggest hiddink is even linked to the investigation into the tax firm he uses, it's all speculation at the moment


YOU GUYS SUCK, read this article, then please stop believing that uruguay are the victims in all this
http://www4.sbs.com.au/home/index.php3?id=65199
i'll even pick out important sections for you

"After a week of political and logistical posturing by Uruguay featuring complaints over referees, battles over kick-off times and one-upmanship over charter flights"

Already the Uruguayans had shifted the kickoff time for the first leg in Montevideo from 4pm on Saturday local time to 9pm local time after booking a charter flight convinced the Socceroos would not be able to do so themselves.

That backfiredwhen the Socceroos organised a charter plane and Uruguay's fell through, with Uruguay then trying to shift the kickoff forward again to 5pm to service their own needs and football's world governing body FIFA being hauled in to arrange a compromise.



you loved one the end result of "the spitting incident" was, and you'd love if it happened again

:lui:
 

pasion1

Senior Squad
Rob said:

:funny: Now now Rob.......that doesnt count as a response. :p (probably took you minutes to try to put happiness into words so just came up with that: :rolleyes:


And for the guy up top......I stopped reading the second he put.

"Check THESE incredibly unbiased links out man...........
www.whogivesa****.com.AU"

No evidence linking to Hiddink huh? I guess all the international sport channels 2 weeks ago............and ESPN.com (which might have the 2-3 articles published on that) are just bull-sh!tting.

Cant wait to Read Australia's verson of it.

"Uruguay frame Gus Hiddink in ploy to eliminate the much deserved- not yet qualified- football world power, Australia."

Ill prob find it under the
"Uruguay president ordering fans to pack rocker launchers at game on saturday. Australian no name player, Crocky Mcvidmar, says "BrEng it on Mates! Weh Oint no shrinkin vOIlets!!!.....OI!"

nice...

PS- Rob.......loved that comeback man. You're the best buddy ;) :p
 

Rob

Mourinho’s Assistant
pasion1 said:
Well after reading all these arguments I've realized 1 thing.

1) PG, it's no secret that Rob is a moron. (How many posts did it take for him to finally understand your argument...like 6?). Just ignore him. He'll go to sleep under his own hate.
What argument mate?
  1. The argument over trying to justify a change in time? Despite the real motives of the AUF being known?
  2. Or the argument about trying to justify a change in the referee because you think some Belgium refs would advantage Australia?
  3. Or the argument trying to justify the events of 4 years ago all because spitting is common in a 3rd world nation? But was 4 years ago so it doesn&#8217;t matter now does it? WW2 was only a few decades ago, but you know its ok now, using that same thesis of an argument.

pasion1 said:
2) It's funny how some aussies come out here to mention about the "Spitting" incident (which was apologyzed for like 4 years ago and is old news) but then some come (after saying that they wont mention it anymore) to say "A nation that spits at another's doesn't deserve to go to the WC"
No, what is funny is that you and your posse try and justify the act of spitting, in other threads you said it is a regular occurrence and that we should get over it, but then here you say you are apologising as if the act is barbaric and that your nation does not agree with it?

So what is it
  1. You are sorry for it?
  2. Or your apologies are false because as you stated in previous threads on this forum, it is a regular occurrence in Uruguay and that we should get over it no matter how barbaric it is on your part?


pasion1 said:
Funny thing is that Hiddink (who wasnt even aware of most of the FFA's insults towards Uruguay) said on the Argentina press 2 days ago "Well They're (Australia) not really used to this stuff in football. The rough stadiums, spitting.......it's normal all over the world for a few people to lose control *laughs* (actually laughs)....completely normal. As long as they have respect as we will do, everything will be fine. It's a football game, not a war"
Please document these insults like the Australians on this forum have document their arguments as this is just hearsay and is flimsy evidence.

pasion1 said:
And it's funny that Hiddink called us cheaters last week.......a man being investigated for Tax Fraud! (before taking it back this morning)
Yes, cheaters because you know, The stadium you played Argentina in had its own microclimate and the pitch was so waterlogged to negate the Argentines since you couldn&#8217;t do it any other way.

Or you know? Changing the time of a kick off and then changing it back because your genius plan backfired?

pasion1 said:
Good call on that one guys.
Until you prove me wrong, it is a good call.

pasion1 said:
And Rob is so delusional its not even funny anymore.
Getting personal now are we?

pasion1 said:
This is what happened with the plane story.
1) Uruguay changed time to late
True, because it secured a chartered flight and believed Australia couldn&#8217;t, giving Uruguay a massive advantage in recovery should they arrive in Australia way before the Australians.
pasion1 said:
2) Aussies agree
Yes, without any fuss unlike your nation.
pasion1 said:
3) Uruguay cant get flight as they thought and want to change back
True, they cant get a flight and want to change it back because their plan to screw over Australia backfired.
pasion1 said:
4) Assies say "screw you" and laugh cause they think it's ironic or something.
The Australians never said screw you, they said no because they had already gone to great lengths to plan everything in this nation such as public gatherings, and then their own logistical arrangements moving the team. This was after they had already change everything once because you changed the kick off already.
pasion1 said:
5) Uruguay simply goes to FIFA who easily changes the time again
FIFA didn&#8217;t change the time, they get the FFA the right to change it or not
pasion1 said:
6) Australia bitch and cry about it saying it's not fair.
No, Australia contemplate changing the time to 5PM however decide not to due to its plans they had already made
pasion1 said:
7) Australia say "How bout 7PM then?"
However, in the interest of the game offered a 7PM kick off which would allow both teams to get out of your third world nation promptly.

pasion1 said:
(Thing is 7PM suits Uruguay fine <they can still catch the plane which lifts like at night). Meaning Uruguay got what they wanted.
No sh*t Sherlock, that&#8217;s the whole point behind a compromise. You are the winner! :rolleyes:

pasion1 said:
Listen we all know that you blame the "spitting guys" for losing 3-0 last year (in a game where the first have could have ended 5 or 6-0 and no one would have said anything about it). But why dont you actually concentrate on the game......rather than trying to justify your hate that you lost the last time.
Uhuh, some saliva ended our world cup dreams, yes it all makes sense now! Here we have one of your compatriots telling us off over stereotypes, and then you say "you" which has a conative meaning of all Australians, saying that they purely blame the spitting incident. You know what they call that? A generalisation or a stereotype.

Ruben Sosa, can you please tell off pasion1? Thanks mate.

pasion1 said:
You wanna know the difference between Uruguay and Australia?
We are a developed nation?

pasion1 said:
I'd still think Uruguay would win if the game was 1 deciding game held at Sydney.
Any of the teams can win anywhere, we are so much better then 2001 and it will prove to be a good spectacle.

pasion1 said:
Even if something were to go wrong (a failed rebound shot that caused Aussies to score and defend 11 back for the win).......Id be calm that we still have a good chance of actually winning (let alone tieing) over there.
In the words of R Kelly, COOL! :fool:

pasion1 said:
Rob please respond I want to see what you write (Ill bring pop corn....I cant wait) :D :)
I cant wait for your funeral.
 

Rob

Mourinho’s Assistant
pasion1 said:
:funny: Now now Rob.......that doesnt count as a response. :p (probably took you minutes to try to put happiness into words so just came up with that: :rolleyes:
K. Whatever Janitor Mach2


pasion1 said:
And for the guy up top......I stopped reading the second he put.

"Check THESE incredibly unbiased links out man...........
www.whogivesa****.com.AU"
Nah, cant post links from our own nation, but YOU can.

Hence this thread http://www.soccergaming.tv/showthread.php?t=127534 Where such links like .. http://www.tenfieldigital.com.uy/servlet/hntdide?0,0,5/,1,29662,1,1,0 or http://www.futbol.com.uy/HNoticia_10391.html or http://www.tenfieldigital.com.uy/servlet/hntdide?0,0,5/,1,29662,1,1,0. Yea?

Oh! but then later on, you used a link from the exact source you are now discrediting. http://www2.sbs.com.au/opinions/index.php3?id=64514

Does that mean we should just ... not listen to you?

pasion1 said:
No evidence linking to Hiddink huh? I guess all the international sport channels 2 weeks ago............and ESPN.com (which might have the 2-3 articles published on that) are just bull-sh!tting.
What? English? Hello? Anybody?

pasion1 said:
Cant wait to Read Australia's verson of it.
But no one gives a ****, remember?

pasion1 said:
"Check THESE incredibly unbiased links out man...........
www.whogivesa****.com.AU"

pasion1 said:
"Uruguay frame Gus Hiddink in ploy to eliminate the much deserved- not yet qualified- football world power, Australia."
By spitting on him and giving him bird flu? Oh man I should write for the papers! (ps. this is sarcasm in case you try and use it)

pasion1 said:
Ill prob find it under the
"Uruguay president ordering fans to pack rocker launchers at game on saturday. Australian no name player, Crocky Mcvidmar, says "BrEng it on Mates! Weh Oint no shrinkin vOIlets!!!.....OI!"
Maybe you can actually do the job, never mind :)

In your words,
pasion1 said:

pasion1 said:
PS- Rob.......loved that comeback man. You're the best buddy ;) :p
Glad you enjoyed it.
 

pasion1

Senior Squad
Rob said:
What argument mate?
  1. The argument over trying to justify a change in time? Despite the real motives of the AUF being known?
  2. Or the argument about trying to justify a change in the referee because you think some Belgium refs would advantage Australia?
  3. Or the argument trying to justify the events of 4 years ago all because spitting is common in a 3rd world nation? But was 4 years ago so it doesn’t matter now does it? WW2 was only a few decades ago, but you know its ok now, using that same thesis of an argument.

No, what is funny is that you and your posse try and justify the act of spitting, in other threads you said it is a regular occurrence and that we should get over it, but then here you say you are apologising as if the act is barbaric and that your nation does not agree with it?

So what is it
  1. You are sorry for it?
  2. Or your apologies are false because as you stated in previous threads on this forum, it is a regular occurrence in Uruguay and that we should get over it no matter how barbaric it is on your part?


Please document these insults like the Australians on this forum have document their arguments as this is just hearsay and is flimsy evidence.

Yes, cheaters because you know, The stadium you played Argentina in had its own microclimate and the pitch was so waterlogged to negate the Argentines since you couldn’t do it any other way.

Or you know? Changing the time of a kick off and then changing it back because your genius plan backfired?

Until you prove me wrong, it is a good call.

Getting personal now are we?

True, because it secured a chartered flight and believed Australia couldn’t, giving Uruguay a massive advantage in recovery should they arrive in Australia way before the Australians.
Yes, without any fuss unlike your nation.
True, they cant get a flight and want to change it back because their plan to screw over Australia backfired.
The Australians never said screw you, they said no because they had already gone to great lengths to plan everything in this nation such as public gatherings, and then their own logistical arrangements moving the team. This was after they had already change everything once because you changed the kick off already.
FIFA didn’t change the time, they get the FFA the right to change it or not
No, Australia contemplate changing the time to 5PM however decide not to due to its plans they had already made
However, in the interest of the game offered a 7PM kick off which would allow both teams to get out of your third world nation promptly.

No sh*t Sherlock, that’s the whole point behind a compromise. You are the winner! :rolleyes:

Uhuh, some saliva ended our world cup dreams, yes it all makes sense now! Here we have one of your compatriots telling us off over stereotypes, and then you say "you" which has a conative meaning of all Australians, saying that they purely blame the spitting incident. You know what they call that? A generalisation or a stereotype.

Ruben Sosa, can you please tell off pasion1? Thanks mate.

We are a developed nation?

Any of the teams can win anywhere, we are so much better then 2001 and it will prove to be a good spectacle.

In the words of R Kelly, COOL! :fool:

I cant wait for your funeral.

:funny: ....look how mad he is!

Dude I stopped reading right about here
(here comes another classic "Dumbass Rob" quote)

"Or the argument trying to justify the events of 4 years ago all because spitting is common in a 3rd world nation? But was 4 years ago so it doesn’t matter now does it? WW2 was only a few decades ago, but you know its ok now, using that same thesis of an argument..............OI <sorry I added that :p"

........WW2 vs. some bums spitting at a few no name players. .....hmm..........i think WW2 is slightly more diff/serious than that.

You did it man.......I never gave you credit. But you just said the stupidest thing to ever come out of this board (or any other board)....ever.
Incredible. Comparing the spitting of 2 guys to WW2.

I completely under estimated you man. :D You are the king

and how bout this one?

"What argument mate?
The argument over trying to justify a change in time? Despite the real motives of the AUF being known?"

:o....no I just called a moron (only spoke about the argument to conclude this very observable fact). Do you ask for an argument and thesis for calling you a moron?

Oh man.....I can imagine how long it took you to quote all that stuff and copy/paste it.
Sorry I dont really have time to read it.

But dont get so mad man. It's ok to accept it....not everyone is perfect.

WW2 though...omg. that killed me .

and this one too "I cant wait for your funeral". Just keep em coming man.
You lovin it? :D :ewan:

EDIT - And you're right Rusi .....poor guy.
 

Rob

Mourinho’s Assistant
pasion1 said:
:funny: ....look how mad he is!

Dude I stopped reading right about here
(here comes another classic "Dumbass Rob" quote)

"Or the argument trying to justify the events of 4 years ago all because spitting is common in a 3rd world nation? But was 4 years ago so it doesn&#8217;t matter now does it? WW2 was only a few decades ago, but you know its ok now, using that same thesis of an argument..............OI <sorry I added that :p"
Ok, you are idiot. Your whole argument is that it is now completely irrelevant because it happened a few years ago.

All I demonstrated is how stupid that argument in fact is, and how stupid it would sound comparing it to other (and MUCH MUCH MUCH worse) events in history. "That doesn&#8217;t matter, it happened 4 years ago" That is known as a hyperbole, it was an overstatement.

Obviously that is too complex for you, so I have a picture for you.



pasion1 said:
........WW2 vs. some bums spitting at a few no name players. .....hmm..........i think WW2 is slightly more diff/serious than that.



pasion1 said:
You did it man.......I never gave you credit. But you just said the stupidest thing to ever come out of this board (or any other board)....ever.
Incredible. Comparing the spitting of 2 guys to WW2.

I completely under estimated you man. :D You are the king
That was the whole point of that argument? To highlight how STUPID yours is. God! I have seen more competent two year olds then yourself.

pasion1 said:
and how bout this one?

"What argument mate?
The argument over trying to justify a change in time? Despite the real motives of the AUF being known?"

:o....no I just called a moron (only spoke about the argument to conclude this very observable fact). Do you ask for an argument and thesis for calling you a moron?
Huh? Rephrase that please, you are a fool.

pasion1 said:
Oh man.....I can imagine how long it took you to quote all that stuff and copy/paste it.
Sorry I dont really have time to read it.
I am sure you read it, you only pointed out the outlandish stuff that was there for a purpose, everything else that was purposely logical and coherent you ignored because it made sense and was correct. Instead you focused on hyperboles that were purposely placed.

pasion1 said:
But dont get so mad man. It's ok to accept it....not everyone is perfect.

WW2 though...omg. that killed me .
It was a hyperbole you IDIOT.

pasion1 said:
and this one too "I cant wait for your funeral". Just keep em coming man.
You lovin it? :D :ewan:
What? What is wrong wishing death upon you?

pasion1 said:
EDIT - And you're right Rusi .....poor guy.
Heh.

Now a summary for you just in case you have trouble understanding

  • WW2 Comparison = Hyperbole, Drawing Notice To That Proves your inability to produce any rational arguments
  • The AUF Argument about the time changes = Proven. Try and discredit it as much as you want, but ... still nothing from you in response to that in any rational way.
  • Wishing death upon you = Common exercise on this forum and is nothing amazing. Again, you're an idiot
  • I highlighted the absence of any rational argument from you for points I made that were not HYPERBOLES, further backing up my stance that you are an idiot and can only discredit things that are discrediting themselves deliberately
 


Top