• This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:

    1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.

    2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.

    3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.

    Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.

    Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.

    Thank you!

Last movie you watched

Internazionale

Elo Ratings
Click

This movie turns out to be a good family movie. I guess our life need to experience those sad days in our family live one day instead of just fast-forwarding/avoiding it.
 

Tom

That Nice Guy
Review of The Last Kiss

According to the proverb, too many chefs spoil the broth. I propose a new one: too many plots spoil the film - and in the case of The Last Kiss it draws its first usage. In his directorial debut, Tony Goldwyn paints an interesting, if ultimately quite predictable film about love, marriage and everything in between.

Anchored with a potentially fantastic cast including Zach Braff, Rachel Bilson and Jacinda Barrett, the plot is written with as much audience involvement as you can possibly get in 115 minutes. Michael (Braff) and Jenna (Barrett) are very much in love. With a baby on the way and wedding bells on the horizon, they appear to have the perfect relationship, but nothing is ever as it seems. Michael starts to worry that he is growing up too fast, and finds a younger version of himself inside when he starts to socialise with 21-year-old Kim (Bilson). What ensues is a story of love, lust and a large dose of heartbreak.

The film's main story and message is beautifully put together by Goldywn. It's accompanied by a modern soundtrack, which sounds as if it came straight from The O.C when Bilson (above) jumped on board. It's certainly of use, keeping the movie firmly in the mainstream. The support acting is impressive: Fully Monty star Tom Wilkinson and Blythe Danner of Meet the Parents fame provide a wealthy source of experience for the other younger members of the cast, while Casey Affleck and Eric Christian Olsen provide a fresher take on proceedings.

However, the sheer size of the cast contributes to my main problem with the film. At one end, we have the excellently constructed main story, beautifully acted out by Braff and Barrett. Yet at the other end, we have four smaller and less-explained plot strands that are both unnecessary and disappointingly derivative. The film has it all: life, death, honesty, dishonesty, growing-up, staying young. In short, anything anyone has ever been through in the world seems to have made its way into the other four plots, and it's wholly unwarranted.

Of course, for all my praise of Braff (above), he just can't get away from his comedic roots. Emotionally charged scenes involving Bilson and Barrett are often spoilt by punchy one-liners that, while funny, disrupt any genuine empathy that you might otherwise feel towards his character. Sadly, it's a trait too common within every other plot: Wilkinson is inappropriately dry in sombre scenes, and Olsen looks to have never acted seriously in his life.

Touching at times and generally realistic, Goldwyn creates a compelling lead story that will have you gripped to the screen. However, the film itself is tainted by four sub-plots that are boring, predictable and awkwardly comedic. The movie is good, but it could have been excellent if some of the more wayward scenes had been brought under control and the overall number of storylines cut down. The Last Kiss is more than watchable, but you just can't help thinking what could have been.

3/5
 
S

Sir Calumn

Guest
Good review Tom. Though I have never seen Jonathan Ross pan a movie as badly as he did The Last Kiss.

I watched The History Boys yesterday - quite an entertaining film but far from great, and I can tell you all, as a smartass state school oxbridge applicant myself, we are nothing like the kids in that film :p Richard Griffiths was awesome, kind of makes me wish I'd had a teacher who groped me, but all in all I think I would much rather have seen the stage version. SPOILERS And the fact that all the boys get in really sucks too, I wanted at least half of them to fail. And they all got ****ty jobs despite of it! Not a good ending. Actually, apart from the groping, there wasnt very much that was good at all. Alright, some of the witty comments are genuinely funny and the different presentations of teachers was good (you should check that out, Tom, could be interesting for the thing we discussed), and some of the kids, though not many, are interesting enough that you actually care about what happens to them, so there are enough good points to make it worth watching. Be warned, however, there is a LOT of homosexuality.
 

Deisler

Red Card [Being a douche] exp. 22/1/06
I saw some old movies this week, courtesy of Netflix :rockman:

Nosferatu the original 1927 version, without sound just picture. Well the movie is a legend and considering the timeline it was done makes it more fascinating.

Elephant Man another old timer. The movie just doesn't get old. Great performance by Sir Anthony Hopkins.

The Siege, not so old Denzel Washington and Bruce Willis movie. Meh 3 years before Sep 11 and this movie almost is an identical aproach. Coincidence? The movie is great btw. Denzel is unique.




I also have a request, from 1 to 5 what how would you rate THE LAST KING OF SCOTLAND? I am curious and want to go see it but sceptical nontheless.
 
S

Sir Calumn

Guest
I went to see A Good Year the other day, and I have to say that I totally dont understand why it has been getting such bad reviews, I absolutely loved it! Russell Crowe is just phenominal, exudes charm and quality and plays the loveable bastard character as well as any I've seen before. I've finally worked out why I like him in some films and not in others - I like him whenever he is putting on his British accent. The camerawork is just BEAUTIFUL, amazing lush shots of the provence, truly stunning. Ridley's direction is great, the moments of comedy are genuinely funny yet the actual story is emotional and dramatic. The supporting acting is good all round and the constant depictions of delicious looking wine, cheese, fruit and food make you ravenously hungry throughout the film. I think in order to enjoy it fully, your idea of a perfect life has to fit in with that of the film - ie relaxing in beautiful provence all day in a mansion, waited on by devoted servants, drinking great wine and eating great food and ******* incredibly beautiful woman. Luckily, I cant think of a more perfect life than that. Every review I have read has been bad, but **** them, see this movie anyway. I rate it ahead of Sideways even.

Hakeem said:
I need to see the last kiss :(

History Boys is supposed to be very good (Y)
It will be far more popular out of Britain than it is in - Americans will LOVE it.
 
S

Sir Calumn

Guest
Oh, I also finally saw Jarhead for the first time, on DVD. What a disappointment that turned out to be - it's not a terrible film, but nowhere near as good as all the hype before its cinematic release suggested. Large sections of it just seem ripped off from other war movies and, while the whole point of the film is to emphasis the boredom and inactivity of modern war, they didnt need to go as far as to bore the audience to prove their point. There are some good scenes and aspects of it do provide important new additions to the genre, but all in all it was a major let down, all seeming rather pointless.
 

Tom

That Nice Guy
see thats why i reckon it was clever Sir_Didier_Drogba, its utterly pointless.

Every review i saw said it was either great or pointless. It's both, its meant to be a nothing film, with no real end, no real character development. It's showing the nothingness, the pointlessness, the boringness of war.

I thought for that, it was clever, if not spectacular.
 
V

Virgo

Guest
I agree with Sir_Didier_Drogba, was very disappointed with Jarhead, apart from the cinematography and overall the image quality that give us some breathtaking shots, there's really nothing above average in that film, no story to tell, nothing.
 

Hakeem

Superman
I thought Jarhead was really great. the history was there, even if nothing really happened. its meant to show what happened to these guys internally, how fvcked up they ended up because of a war they had to wait to wait and wait for it to happen and it never did. But that wait for nothing destroyed them.
and yes, the cinematography was excellent, the soundtrack too, and the performances were top class IMO, even though I said that year that Sarsgaard could've been so much better in it. And Jake Gyllenhaal was excellent I think but Im a big fan of his always. I also loved Foxx's work in it (Y)
 
S

Sir Calumn

Guest
The acting is perfectly adequate, especially from Foxx, but the characters were poorly written in my opinion. I agree with all that's been said about the cinematography, it was visually very fine, but that was by far it's biggest perk. Many of the scenes and ideas seemed directly ripped from other films such as Full Metal Carlos*et, Platoon and Born on the Fourth of July, and I did not get any sense of originality or groundbreakingness when watching the film. Nor did I develop any sort of connection or liking for the characters and I feel that had the issues of this film not been so relevant to today, had it been released before the second Iraq war or had it been about a different war, that it would not have even recieved the moderate praise that it did. I suppose the one good thing it did do was reinforce and confirm my hatred of soldiers and the military, but otherwise, save the occasional well written scene and great cinematography, it just seemed like a big waste of time.
 

Shindig

Fan Favourite
One Hour Photo. Starts off a bit cliched but, despite Robin Williams' madness sticking out like a sore thumb, it's still a good film. Even has a couple of chuckles in it (The Christmas scene, for one).

Robin pulls off a proper role quite well. Ending's a bit weird and doesn't offer much in finality. In any other film, Will would've got the door slammed in his face and justice would prevail. I blame the kid. Baggage.
 


Top