• This is a reminder of 3 IMPORTANT RULES:

    1- External self-promotion websites or apps are NOT allowed here, like Discord/Twitter/Patreon/etc.

    2- Do NOT post in other languages. English-only.

    3- Crack/Warez/Piracy talk is NOT allowed.

    Breaking any of the above rules will result in your messages being deleted and you will be banned upon repetition.

    Please, stop by this thread SoccerGaming Forum Rules And Guidelines and make sure you read and understand our policies.

    Thank you!

Most War Protesters...

INFESTA

Official
Originally posted by Elder
I actually do know what I am talking about... it's sad you need someone to explain it to you. Look it up! It makes you smarter!

Sometimes I like to start reading threads from the bottom and go all the way up. That was the case in this thread. When I read this comment from you, even without knowing what generated it, I felt immediately the urge to answer your arrogant manners with some irony: 'How come it didn't help you one bit?'

Instead of doing so promptly, I read the thread all the way up and got the answer myself. Not that I was expecting a serious answer from your part, since that question was meant to be one of the rethorical kind, but still...

Anyway, and getting to the point, how could you get any smarter if you were looking on the wrong places? By the way, where exactly did you get the information that the 90's healthy economy was 'built on the internet'? I'd really like to know what prestigious economy publication has issued such a profound intricate piece of garbage. And don't come with the ''I'm not your research assistant'' excuse; if you got that information, you don't need to research any longer, do you?
I am interested specifically on these points:

- The economic growth started in the first years of the last decade. The internet boom and subsequent false growth came way later. How could the 90's economy have been built on the internet? Wasn't it the other way around, with all that excitement - common in prosperous eras - leading to a unreal beliefs in an Eldorado?

- What about the gigantic boost other industries had, such as the automotive and electronic? Was it also based on the internet frenzy?

- Economy itself is ruled by cylces of prosperity and depression. Govs and economic institutions (such as the Deutch Bank) try to sooth the effects of this cycle by taking measures to heat or cold the economy, according to forecasts and present situation. In what phase of the economic cycle were we at in the 90's?

- What role played Europe on the internet economy boost of the 90's? As you know, my continent also experienced an overwhelming economic development from the early 90's to its very last days of the decade. Being european companies traditionally less prone to those cool new gadgets (such as the internet) and thus slower to respond to its American and Japanese competitors, would you say our development was also based on the 'bubble'? Or, as some american pundits love to say, our development was a reflex of the wave America was riding, neglecting the fact that your market is super protectionist towards us?


And please, don't answer with shallow facts for which you provide no cover whatsoever. If you got numbers, I want them justified. Show us how to get smarter.

Also, you'd better tone down your arrogant approach.
I've also read some insults from your part in this very same thread. I expect you to act with the dignity we all know you are capable of. More insults will not be tolerated.
 

Elder

Starting XI
Originally posted by INFESTA
Sometimes I like to start reading threads from the bottom and go all the way up. That was the case in this thread. When I read this comment from you, even without knowing what generated it, I felt immediately the urge to answer your arrogant manners with some irony: 'How come it didn't help you one bit?'

Instead of doing so promptly, I read the thread all the way up and got the answer myself. Not that I was expecting a serious answer from your part, since that question was meant to be one of the rethorical kind, but still...

Anyway, and getting to the point, how could you get any smarter if you were looking on the wrong places? By the way, where exactly did you get the information that the 90's healthy economy was 'built on the internet'? I'd really like to know what prestigious economy publication has issued such a profound intricate piece of garbage. And don't come with the ''I'm not your research assistant'' excuse; if you got that information, you don't need to research any longer, do you?
I am interested specifically on these points:

- The economic growth started in the first years of the last decade. The internet boom and subsequent false growth came way later. How could the 90's economy have been built on the internet? Wasn't it the other way around, with all that excitement - common in prosperous eras - leading to a unreal beliefs in an Eldorado?

- What about the gigantic boost other industries had, such as the automotive and electronic? Was it also based on the internet frenzy?

- Economy itself is ruled by cylces of prosperity and depression. Govs and economic institutions (such as the Deutch Bank) try to sooth the effects of this cycle by taking measures to heat or cold the economy, according to forecasts and present situation. In what phase of the economic cycle were we at in the 90's?

- What role played Europe on the internet economy boost of the 90's? As you know, my continent also experienced an overwhelming economic development from the early 90's to its very last days of the decade. Being european companies traditionally less prone to those cool new gadgets (such as the internet) and thus slower to respond to its American and Japanese competitors, would you say our development was also based on the 'bubble'? Or, as some american pundits love to say, our development was a reflex of the wave America was riding, neglecting the fact that your market is super protectionist towards us?


And please, don't answer with shallow facts for which you provide no cover whatsoever. If you got numbers, I want them justified. Show us how to get smarter.

Also, you'd better tone down your arrogant approach.
I've also read some insults from your part in this very same thread. I expect you to act with the dignity we all know you are capable of. More insults will not be tolerated.

If you don't believe the internet had anything to do with the booming economy in the 90's, then you must have been living under a rock. Have you ever heard of the "dot com boom" and the subsequent "dot com bust"?

The internet was the impetus for people to run out and buy massive amounts of computers, software, printers, games, digi cams etc. etc. Maybe you've heard of Microsoft?

During the early part of the 90's the economy was beginning to rise under George Bush 1. Only for a small recession to hit for two quarters during the first Gulf War. This was part of the reason for Bush's downfall... raising taxes was the other.

Clinton came into office and rode the wave that was being created int he early 90's. YET, if you know anything about US politics, in 1994, the Republican Party took over the House of Representatives and forced Bill Clinton to sign "Welfare Reform." This was a massive boom to the economy as it forced many people to get their ass of the couch and go find a job.

I would say the internet boom was set into place around 1994 or 1995... During the next few years, the internet began to grow and grow and grow as companies began to set up online. I can't remember what year it was, but it was during the Superbowl and most of the commercials were for "dot com" companies. The next year, they were all out of business. Pets.com comes to mind....

To this day I don't even know if Amazon.com has made a profit. If I remember correctly, they are the largest etailer.. But during the entire boom, they never posted a profit.

The Nasdaq was booming during this time because of these dot coms and all the "money" they were going to make. These companies hired thousands upon thousands of employees, blew money like it was monopoly cash, and had no worries. Then comes the bust... Everyone gets fired, Nasdaq hits bottom, and the economy starts to sink.

Cue Election 2000. Bush warns the country during the campaign that we are in a recession.. 6 months before the November elections. Democrats call him all sorts of names and claim the economy is still great... It was all bull****.

Bush gets elected, and all of the companies who were trying to survive the end of the 90's end up in deep trouble.. Enron, Global Crossing, Tyco all get busted for accounting fraud.. More jobs lost..

About Europe... Your economy is tied directly to ours.. You go up and down depending on what the US is doing.

To answer another question.. The electronic boom was a result of computers.. internet.. etc.

The US auto industry has been in trouble for years...

The whole point and the beginning of this subject was about Bush and Clinton. Mr. Inter claimed that Bush was to blame for the economy being bad. Sorry, but it's much more complicated than that.. No president has the power to sink the economy or make it grow that much.
 

JTNY

Starting XI
Give me an A
Give me an R
Give me an R
Give me an O
Give men a G
Give me an A
Give me an N
Give me a C
Give me an E

What does it spell?

ELDER!


Sorry, but I just got that vibe from your recent posts, on the internet you cannot tell tone on and other communication mechanisms of the human on the internet.... I may be wrong, or right.
 

Elder

Starting XI
Originally posted by JTNY
Give me an A
Give me an R
Give me an R
Give me an O
Give men a G
Give me an A
Give me an N
Give me a C
Give me an E

What does it spell?

ELDER!


Sorry, but I just got that vibe from your recent posts, on the internet you cannot tell tone on and other communication mechanisms of the human on the internet.... I may be wrong, or right.

Actually, it spells arrogance. :hump:
 

Avalanche

Senior Squad
No, A-R-R-O-G-A-N-C-E spells Elder. Face it, you are fighting a losing battle, as the only conservative among liberals on this forum. The SG forums have no room for self-rightous far-right wingers like you. Go listen to Rush Limbaugh and watch Sean Hannity and the rest of the conservative losers on Unfair and Imbalanced News, and leave us the hell alone.

FORÇA O PARTIDO DEMOCRATO!
 

Elder

Starting XI
Originally posted by Avalanche1996
No, A-R-R-O-G-A-N-C-E spells Elder. Face it, you are fighting a losing battle, as the only conservative among liberals on this forum. The SG forums have no room for self-rightous far-right wingers like you. Go listen to Rush Limbaugh and watch Sean Hannity and the rest of the conservative losers on Unfair and Imbalanced News, and leave us the hell alone.

FORÇA O PARTIDO DEMOCRATO!

Wow, and whats does this spell?

I
G
N
O
R
A
N
C
E

Oh well, it's typical of left wingers like yourself to assume things about people and what they do or do not listen to on the radio.

And maybe you should point out what was so "arrogant" about my post. Obviously you have nothing to say in response... Maybe that's because you know squat about simple economics.

Join the revolution man, you are sorely needed... like 90 years ago.
 

xxxFLYERxxx

Starting XI
Elder, you're a good man.

The extreme left is just as bad as the extreme right. Dont let these idiots call you names just because you're leaning to the right side of the spectrum.

Democrats think they're so above everybody else, it makes me sick. "Bush is an idiot!" - wow, thats so original. And these 6 clowns running for the democratic ticket are gonna do a much better job. :rolleyes:

I like staying in the middle, hating both political parties, and voting for whoever i dislike the least.
 

rhizome17

Fan Favourite
Originally posted by xxxFLYERxxx

just because you're leaning to the right side of the spectrum.

Leaning? I thought he had fallen off :p


Originally posted by xxxFLYERxxx
"Bush is an idiot!" - wow, thats so original.

About as original as 'Saddam has WMD!".

Bush is statistically more likely to be an idiot, than Saddam is to have WMD.
 

Elder

Starting XI
Originally posted by rhizome17
Leaning? I thought he had fallen off :p




About as original as 'Saddam has WMD!".

Bush is statistically more likely to be an idiot, than Saddam is to have WMD.

It's a long drop, can somebody catch me please?

:D
 

Elder

Starting XI
Originally posted by xxxFLYERxxx
Elder, you're a good man.

The extreme left is just as bad as the extreme right. Dont let these idiots call you names just because you're leaning to the right side of the spectrum.

Democrats think they're so above everybody else, it makes me sick. "Bush is an idiot!" - wow, thats so original. And these 6 clowns running for the democratic ticket are gonna do a much better job. :rolleyes:

I like staying in the middle, hating both political parties, and voting for whoever i dislike the least.

Most left wingers I have met in life always think their opinions rise above everyone else's in life. They also believe in "free speech" but only if it's the speech they agree with or want to hear.

Case in point, Howard Dean telling that voter to sit down and be quiet in Iowa. (part of the reason he lost Iowa was because of this stunt)

Second case in point, someone is shouting at Howard Dean at a rally that doesn't agree with him and Al Franken up and gang tackles him. Al Franken later states something like "I did what I did because I believe in free speech." ???? What?

Third case in point. "Hate Crime" laws... The act of punishing thoughts and speech more severely just because that person said something racist, homophobic, etc.. As if killing someone isn't bad enough, now it has become, "well, he didn't like him because he was black and killed him so we will give him two death sentences instead of one." Again, what?

If Kerry does win the nomination, he will be destroyed by his past record. Edwards can't win the south as a VP. Bush is already from Texas.... Gore couldn't win a SINGLE state in the south, even though he was from Tennessee.

The left wing is actually dead in this country. Look up the names "Howard Dean" and "Dennis Kucinich"
 

rhizome17

Fan Favourite
Originally posted by Elder
If Kerry does win the nomination, he will be destroyed by his past record. Edwards can't win the south as a VP. Bush is already from Texas....

I am saving this one for after the election, like I did with the WMD quotes people made earlier in the year in the Iraq thread. They are often useful reminders not to predict the future with certainty. :mrpimp:
 

Elder

Starting XI
Originally posted by rhizome17
I am saving this one for after the election, like I did with the WMD quotes people made earlier in the year in the Iraq thread. They are often useful reminders not to predict the future with certainty. :mrpimp:

That's cool. Kerry's record is actually pretty bad. Just about everything you hear him talking out against now, he was for at one point in time. It might work for the primaries, but not in a general election..


BUT, Bush could still lose. We will see.
 

xxxFLYERxxx

Starting XI
Originally posted by rhizome17




About as original as 'Saddam has WMD!".

Bush is statistically more likely to be an idiot, than Saddam is to have WMD.

Ok. You got me there.(H)

Does it really matter who the president is? Whoever it is will find a way to mess it up anyway.
 

rhizome17

Fan Favourite
Originally posted by xxxFLYERxxx


Does it really matter who the president is? Whoever it is will find a way to mess it up anyway.

Maybe, but Bush exports the mess to other parts of the world, so it would be better top have someone who can keep the mess at home (Y)
 

Moron

Fast Breeder
Life Ban
Originally posted by rhizome17
Maybe, but Bush exports the mess to other parts of the world, so it would be better top have someone who can keep the mess at home (Y)

(Y)

maybe we should ruin Bush's record with the Bush Money Fortunes documentary, allot of **** there (Y)
 

INFESTA

Official
Originally posted by Elder
If you don't believe the internet had anything to do with the booming economy in the 90's, then you must have been living under a rock. Have you ever heard of the "dot com boom" and the subsequent "dot com bust"?

The internet was the impetus for people to run out and buy massive amounts of computers, software, printers, games, digi cams etc. etc. Maybe you've heard of Microsoft?


Elder, when I told you back there to tone down your arrogance I was looking at your best interest. As in previous posts, this need to feel superior by looking and talking as if you were (superior) sort of blinds you, mate. Really, it does. Where in my text did you read that the internet had nothing to do with the economical boom of the 90's? What I have denied was that 'the 90's economy was built on the internet', which is obviously false.
The internet boom helped pushing the economy to some extent, but the frenzy (that lasted only a year and a half, really) came on by the mid 90's. Without this internet boom, we would still have had one of the most healthy economical periods ever!

Seriously, that was a dumb sentence that I didn't expect to come off from your mouth. And it has nothing to do with us, lefties, feeling more superior than anyone out there. I don't, at least, since it would contradict all I believe in.


Originally posted by Elder
During the early part of the 90's the economy was beginning to rise under George Bush 1. Only for a small recession to hit for two quarters during the first Gulf War. This was part of the reason for Bush's downfall... raising taxes was the other.

[...]

The whole point and the beginning of this subject was about Bush and Clinton. Mr. Inter claimed that Bush was to blame for the economy being bad. Sorry, but it's much more complicated than that.. No president has the power to sink the economy or make it grow that much.

I selected these two paragraphs because they sort of contradict one another. Speak for themselves, really.
It's scary how easy it is to burst the bubble, friend. We don't realize it, because we take it for granted. One 11/09 can blow away a giant industry like the aeronautic, which creats a domino effect, taking down with it all the companies directly or indirectly working for it, all the people who work at them, all their families, all the companies that fed on what those families bought, etc.
A sudden disease, a natural disaster, even the wrong sentence coming from the mouth of a president can have a serious and enduring effect on the economy and, consequently, our lives.




Originally posted by Elder
Clinton came into office and rode the wave that was being created int he early 90's. YET, if you know anything about US politics, in 1994, the Republican Party took over the House of Representatives and forced Bill Clinton to sign "Welfare Reform." This was a massive boom to the economy as it forced many people to get their ass of the couch and go find a job.

I would say the internet boom was set into place around 1994 or 1995... During the next few years, the internet began to grow and grow and grow as companies began to set up online. I can't remember what year it was, but it was during the Superbowl and most of the commercials were for "dot com" companies. The next year, they were all out of business. Pets.com comes to mind....

To this day I don't even know if Amazon.com has made a profit. If I remember correctly, they are the largest etailer.. But during the entire boom, they never posted a profit.

The Nasdaq was booming during this time because of these dot coms and all the "money" they were going to make. These companies hired thousands upon thousands of employees, blew money like it was monopoly cash, and had no worries. Then comes the bust... Everyone gets fired, Nasdaq hits bottom, and the economy starts to sink.

Cue Election 2000. Bush warns the country during the campaign that we are in a recession.. 6 months before the November elections. Democrats call him all sorts of names and claim the economy is still great... It was all bull****.

Bush gets elected, and all of the companies who were trying to survive the end of the 90's end up in deep trouble.. Enron, Global Crossing, Tyco all get busted for accounting fraud.. More jobs lost..

About Europe... Your economy is tied directly to ours.. You go up and down depending on what the US is doing.

To answer another question.. The electronic boom was a result of computers.. internet.. etc.

The US auto industry has been in trouble for years...

I don't know how well the american auto industry did in the 90's, I doubt they were in trouble (will check it out), but the fact is that, in general, automotive companies blossomed during that decade like they never had! And it had nothing to do with the internet. Absolutely nothing! You can apply this thought to virtually every single.

I set you up a little trap, hopefully you'll forgive me. I mentioned the electronic boom, which is obviously tied to the massification of the personal computer, thinking you'd link this with the internet. You fell for it, I'm afraid. The bill we all owe Bill Gates was his vision of every home with a PC. For that, he managed to lower the prices (while busting/buying out the competition at the same time), and making us believe we needed a computer in our dayly routine. By 1995, when I entered college, my country was one of the first in the world to have widespread internet access and free email accounts. I, like virtually everybody, had a PC; still, only a few of us had internet access in our private homes. It was only a good year and a half later that the number of internet surfers grew substancially OUTSIDE the university environment.
Besides, you don't need a good computer to access the internet.
Again, I'm not saying that the internet didn't help at all the economy. It did, alright, but wasn't the catalyst.

There is still much to be said, but you're still to show me the articles where it was written that statement about the economy beeing built on the internet. ;)
 

JTNY

Starting XI
People on the left are nice and like to help people. People on the right like to back wars and are happy what war brings. Seeing you reverted to stereotypes, I thought I would join in. :|

Face it, Iraq war was on false pretences. That is what every thread like this turns into, about 5 people disagreeing with you and your murdrerous views. Well I would like to withdraw from this tirade.:hump:
 


Top