It was fucking cold....but good. I enjoyed it. Though I don't think it was the best game. It generally lived up to expectations though. Not sure I'd do it again though. It wasn't bad, just nothing really stood out to me as amazing. The game goes soooo long with so little action - I find it ironic now that quite a few Americans I know bag out cricket for this exact reason.
Beckham Jr was an absolute standout. I'd also have thought Washington were EASILY the better side for the first half. They generally made yards much easier, and seemed to get loads more first downs. Giants just seemed to do it when it mattered, and then ran away with it in the end.
I also like the fact that in our national football codes - Aussie Rules and Rugby League, players have to be much more rounded. Whilst they do still definitely have specific roles, they all have to do a bit of everything. NFL they learn one job, and that's it. I don't like that. Even NBA, the best centres can shoot from the outside, the best guards can grab rebounds or block etc. I think NFL is too specialised.
All of that said, Hayne's skillset is certainly up there. I think when you've said that Hayne rarely had to run through the high traffic the NFL players run through, that you're not really noticing some key differences. I) Hayne has no blockers, this is illegal in rugby, and it's purely about getting past them yourself.
II) NRL spread players wider, but have 13 on the field, not 11.
III) All of the defence in rugby league is worried about the guy with the ball. Unlike American Football where half of them aren't even watching the ball, just blocking guys from tackling etc.
Take those few things into account, and I think Hayne breaking the line in rugby league so often means much more. If he can learn the basics of American football positioning, and can catch a pigskin anywhere near how gee catches our big fat easter eggs, he could be an awesome wide receiver.